Not exact matches
The
carbon sink idea of the Kyoto Protocol (Article 3.4) may therefore partly be accomplished efficiently by
organic agriculture.
Lead author PhD student Adam Hejnowicz said: «Seagrass meadows could play a vital role in combating climate change as they are regarded as a net global
sink for
carbon.They have the capacity to bury significant deposits of
organic carbon beneath the sediment, up to many metres thick in places and over millenary time scales.»
We have shown that hydrothermal vent fluids contain almost none of the
organic carbon which accumulates in the oceans, which means that vents are a
sink for this unreactive «stored»
carbon.»
Dr Jeff Hawkes, the lead author of this study, from the NOC said: «There has been a long outstanding question about whether hydrothermal vents are a source or
sink of
organic carbon to the oceans.
«It essentially means that, through multiple means, in a world with mixotrophs, more
organic carbon is
sinking into the deep ocean than in a world without mixotrophs,» Follows says.
That deep water is not only rich in nutrients, it also has relatively high concentrations of
carbon dioxide, both because it is cold (cold water can absorb and hold more
carbon dioxide than warm water) and because the decomposition of
organic matter that
sinks into the depths releases
carbon dioxide.
As these more substantial microbes die, the researchers found they increase the flux of
sinking organic carbon particles by as much as 35 percent.
The scientists focused on the ocean's biological pump, which exports
organic carbon from the euphotic zone — the well - lit, upper ocean — through
sinking particulate matter, largely from zooplankton feces and aggregates of algae.
Small, slow -
sinking organic particles may play a bigger role than previously thought in the transport of
carbon below the surface ocean.
«We are continuously asked, how much
organic carbon and CO2 do gelatinous plankton
sink worldwide, whether their export capacities are similar to phytoplankton and marine snow.
«And, what puzzles researchers working on the biological
carbon pump: it is higher than that of non-calcifying phytoplankton and marine snow, the main
sinking particles and
organic carbon sources to the ocean interior».
References: Lebrato, M., de Jesus Mendes, P., Steinberg, D. K., Cartes, J. E., Jones, B. M., Birsa, L. M., Benavides, R. und Oschlies, A. (2013) Jelly biomass
sinking speed reveals a fast
carbon export mechanism Limnology and Oceanography, 58 (3), http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.3.1113 Lebrato, M., Pahlow, M., Oschlies, A., Pitt, K. A., Jones, D. O. B., Molinero, J. C. und Condon, R. H. (2011) Depth attenuation of
organic matter export associated with jelly falls Limnology and Oceanography, 56, http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.5.1917 Lebrato, M., Pitt, K. A., Sweetman, A. K., Jones, D. O. B., Cartes, J. E., Oschlies, A., Condon, R. H., Molinero, J. C., Adler, L., Gaillard, C., Lloris, D. und Billett, D. S. M. (2012) Jelly - falls historic and recent observations: a review to drive future research directions Hydrobiologia, 690 (1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1046-8
Stuck to their calcium carbonate platelets,
organic matter
sinks to the ocean floor — allowing surface layers to take up a new
carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and process it.
A rapid depletion in 13C between about 17,500 and 14,000 years ago, simultaneous with a time when the CO2 concentration rose substantially, is consistent with release of CO2 from an isolated deep - ocean source that accumulated
carbon due to the
sinking of
organic material from the surface.
(Then from conclusion):» Finally, the increased exudation of dissolved
organic carbon might increase aggregation and potential for
sinking of particles.»
Not only are they one of the most important
carbon sinks, storing more
carbon than both the atmosphere and the world's oil reserves, they also constantly remove
carbon from the atmosphere through photosynthesis, which converts atmospheric
carbon to
organic matter.
As researchers concluded in a new study published in Geophysical Research Letters, ocean iron fertilization can only prove successful as a climate geoengineering approach if, in addition to phytoplankton bloom stimulation, «a proportion of the particulate
organic carbon (POC) produced must
sink down the water column and reach the main thermocline or deeper before being remineralized... and the third phase is long - term sequestration of the
carbon at depth out of contact with the atmosphere.»
The Earth has two tried and proven
carbon sinks, plants and
organic calcium carbonate.
But in contrast to those models, DIC is rapidly assimilated into particulate
organic carbon via photosynthesis, which raises pH. Particulate
organic carbon (alive or dead) is heavy, and if not consumed and recycled, it
sinks.
While 50 % of the sequestered
carbon formed during photosynthesis is respired before
sinking into the dark depths, a tremendous pool of dissolved
organic carbon has been created that may not be respired for decades, centuries or millennia and slowly contributes to the pool of DIC at various depths and locations (Giorgiou 2002).
A lower rate of respiration would allow more
organic carbon to
sink to deeper depths before being completely consumed.
The marine biota also redistribute
carbon: marine organisms grow
organic tissue and calcareous shells in surface waters, which, after their death,
sink to deeper waters, where they are returned to the dissolved inorganic
carbon reservoir by dissolution and microbial decomposition.
The efflux rate, or true
sink rate, is the rate of mineralization or inorganic and
organic, biotic,
carbon; mostly due aquatic organisms.
Photosynthesis in the sunlit upper ocean produces O2, which escapes to the atmosphere; it also produces particles of
organic carbon that
sink into deeper waters before they
Forest regrowth may account for a large part of the land
carbon sink in some regions (e.g., Pacala et al., 2001; Schimel et al., 2001; Hurtt et al., 2002; Sitch et al., 2005), while combustion of vegetation and soil
organic matter may be responsible for a significant fraction of the interannual variability in CO2 (Cochrane, 2003; Nepstad et al., 2004; Kasischke et al., 2005; Randerson et al., 2005).
If by dissolved
carbon you mean dissolved
organic matter, this is particulate
organic matter where the particles are so small that they don't
sink.
I think Peter Ward's theory probably has O2
sinking for other reasons, an imbalance of the burial and weathering of
organic carbon over geologic time for example.
Animals and bacteria in the twilight zone often consume and further decompose the
sinking marine snow, converting the
carbon into dissolved
organic and inorganic forms that can find their way back to the surface and then the atmosphere.