«Moreover, in the absence of information regarding levels of persistent
organic pollutants across participating cohorts, our hypothesis that fish - associated contaminant exposure may play a role in the observed associations remains speculative,» the authors write.
Maybe that's why there's such higher diabetes risk, since more than 90 % of the persistent
organic pollutants comes from animal foods — unless you work in a chemical factory, or stumble
across some toxic waste.
* The role of the US in global efforts to address
pollutants that are broadly dispersed
across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent
organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)