I wasn't happy with my example of strategy games in
my original comment above, but it was late and Snake no function well sleep without.
Yes, I added the link you posted into
your original comment above.
That was
my original comment above - the world of bonds has changed.
Not exact matches
But Delsin's
original comment and the one civil response
above are worth considering.
=============== Summary: Other than your
comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1
above), the remainder of your
comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your
original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.
You said, «Summary: Other than your
comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1
above), the remainder of your
comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your
original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.»
-LSB-...] going back to the book — which characters said each of the
above quotes, give it a shot in the
comments [section beneath the
original post] and if you get them all right I'll have to figure out something really cool that I can give you.
-LSB-...] going back to the book — which characters said each of the
above quotes, give it a shot in the
comments [section beneath the
original post] and if you get them all right I'll have to figure out something really cool that I can give -LSB-...]
For instance --[Response: I don't usually resort to sarcasm in my
original response,
above, but Alastair McDonald's
comment must surely rank as one of the most impressive displays of know - it - all - ness I've seen yet on RealClimate.
But I severely rewrote my
original comment to produce the
above blog post, and to bring it back involves a quantum of work I'm not sure is worthwhile.
I've provided links throughout the
original post and the
comments following to sources that demonstrate each of the
above points.
I didn't write the belittling
original post, I didn't attack reputable scientists (except for a sarcastic tongue and cheek
comment about investigating all possible miscreants, when the
comments above alleged fraud), and I have tried to keep the focus on the data itself, and off attacks on scientists.
I echo Julie / FurryCatHerder's
comments at # 86
above about the arrogant stench of the
original «article» (which could be boiled down to «Why aren't stupid journalists as smart as us?
In response to some of the
comments above: the conclusion as stated by Oreskes is stronger than my paraphrasing of it, and I've edited my
original post to make this clear.
As the
comments on the
original post
above indicate, in the US and Europe we're seeing the rise of the specialist law firm which caters for large institutions and is denting BigLaw's revenues and client relationships.
I learned from other Insta - captions and
comments that Lauren found the bed frame for $ 50, the chandelier was
original to the house, the bedskirt and boxwood wreath from Target, the wooden chair is the only dining chair they were able to salvage from their first home, the vintage oars came from Brett's fire station, they found the door mounted
above the bed years ago on a date, Lauren won the (customized) Stillwater Farm sign from Charlie and Ella, and the buffalo check duvet is from Ikea.
Love what you said
above in the
comments about buying this from the
original owners.