Additionally, we may fear that
the original giver of the gift would be offended.
The results showed that regifters thought
the original giver of a gift should have some say in what was done with an unwanted gift, whereas original givers were less likely to feel this level of investment.
Not exact matches
This meets my question's
original criteria
of a
gift giver paying for stock without having any
of the recipient's personal information and thus maintaining the
gift's surprise.
In a later study, participants (again in the roles
of original giver and potential regifter) imagined that the
gift was either regifted or thrown away.
Using both hypothetical and actual scenarios, a group
of researchers explored the taboo
of regifting in a series
of five studies to see how
original givers (the ones who gave the
gift first) and regifters (the ones regifting a
gift) felt about regifting.1 In the first study, participants were asked to imagine that they were either (1) the
original giver (who gave a
gift to a friend that was subsequently regifted) or (2) the regifter (who received a
gift and decided to give it to a second recipient).
A third study had trios
of friends regift predetermined «bad
gifts» (e.g., a magazine for retired people, a weight - loss cookbook, a DVD about Mandy Moore's life) in a laboratory setting, with each friend rating how much input the
original giver should have in what the regifter did with the
gift.