The original headline of the article said we had 5 years but now it's less than 2 years to stop building any new stuff that uses fossil fuels.
Not exact matches
This could be because the
original article leaves the author enough wiggle room, including the use
of a question mark
headline, to say, «I didn't say we knew for sure.»
If you are an editor, producer, or webmaster
of a web site or blog that wishes to include ScienceDaily's
headlines and, optionally, summaries on your site, you may freely reproduce our
headlines and summaries from stories under «Today's Top Stories,» «Recent Stories,» or from our «News Sections» and archives (basically, from any stories with» / releases /» in the path
of their URLs)-- provided that you include the appropriate links to the corresponding
articles on ScienceDaily's web server and mention Science Daily as the source
of these links (and, optionally, the source
of the
original news release).
After we approve your submission, the
headline of your
articles and a short abstract
of your
articles (maximum
of 150 words) will be displayed at e-Learning Feeds along with the url (read full story) to the
original source
of the
articles — your Top e-Learning blog's
articles!
, and the same ones who think its OK to change the
headline in this way, say I'm the bad guy when I say shiii about sonykids, yeah I'm the bad guy, so what do I know, ha ha = JOY ha ha come on MK at least do nt play stupid, here I'll give you the direct quote from the posting guidelines section: «Always use the
original headline of the source
article for your N4G
headline when possible.
(I learned in marketing that a
headline should be 7 words or less — well this is 8) and The more photos
of the actual sites, the better, I remember your
original article had lots
of photos
of the sites.