The original jury verdict was for just over $ 1 billion.
Not exact matches
A judge ruled the
jury reached the
verdict against the preponderance of evidence in the case because prosecutors strayed from the legal theory presented in the
original indictment.
The crown argued that much of the material about Baghdadi's benefit claims may have been known by Dizaei at the time of the trial and thus did not count as new evidence, which is needed to overturn the
jury's
verdict in the
original trial.
«While we are pleased that the majority of
original claims were dismissed in this case, we regret that the
jury did not find for us completely on those that remained, and will vigorously pursue all options to overturn their
verdict.
«While we are pleased that the majority of the
original claims were dismissed in this case, we regret that the
jury did not find for us completely on those that remained and will vigorously pursue all options to overturn their
verdict.