According to Stephen Scott, a constitutional law professor at McGill University,
the original point of the law was to ensure courts in colonial America had the same traditional powers as those in England.
Not exact matches
It is scarcely questionable, however, that this symbol originally
pointed to the final consummation
of a dynamic process
of the transcendent's becoming immanent:
of a distant, a majestic, and a sovereign Lord breaking into time and space in such a way as to transfigure and renew all things whatsoever, thereby abolishing the old cosmos
of the
original creation, and likewise bringing to an end all that
law and religion which had thus far been established in history.
But whether one affirms or questions the appropriateness
of separation as a metaphor; whether one looks to the
original intent
of our constitutional authors and their allies or views the
law as an evolving entity; whether one
points to establishment or free exercise as the key to American religious liberty, Hamburger's Separation
of Church and State is a book destined to ensure that the argument continues.
DreamWorks Animation's toon film Home and The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out
of Water, produced by Nickelodeon Movies and Paramount Animation, are outside players, while the unrelated Brazilian movie The Boy and the World, The Boy and the Beast from Mamoru Hosoda and Studio Chizu, The
Laws of the Universe Part 0 (based on the teachings
of a new Japanese religion called Happy Science), the Finnish film Moomins on the Riviera and Regular Show: The Movie, an animated film based on the Cartoon Network
original series — are unknown quantities at this
point.
Another
original sponsor
of the
law, Senator Scott Beason, stepped in at this
point and was able to work with Rep. Hammon,
law enforcement, and others and come to an agreement that made the necessary changes to strengthen the
original law without weakening its effect.
Most, on both sides
of the argument, agree that at this
point in time, for the ERA to be passed into
law it would require re-ratification by the states, as the
original 7 - year period has long expired.
If a loans meets the following tests, it is covered under the
law: 1) For a first - lien loan otherwise referred to as the
original mortgage on the property - the Annual Percentage Rate (APR) exceeds by more than 8 percentage
points compared against the rates on Treasury securities
of comparable maturity; 2) For a second - lien loan otherwise referred to as a 2nd mortgage - the APR (Annual Percentage Rate) exceeds by more than 10 percentage
points compared to the rates in Treasury securities
of comparable maturity; or the total
points and fees payable by the borrower at or before closing exceed the larger
of $ 561 or 8 %
of the total loan amount.
My
original statement did not talk about validity, my
point in that statement was until the presumably valid patent is upheld by a court
of law either through a challange defense or successful infringement litigation, the patent really is not worth the paper it is written on.
I recall reading a discussion a few years ago when some applied scientist was arguing this
point and saying that word wasn't in the
original statements
of the
law, he quoted from old physics text books he had learned from as well as current ones in use in his industry.
The dissent
pointed out that based on the limited number
of musical notes, there is a limited number
of original combination that are capable
of protection under copyright
law.
Section 204 stated, with emphasis added, that an applicant «may appeal to the county court on any
point of law arising from the decision or... the
original decision».