Sentences with phrase «original point of the post»

What equipment do I need for 80 Day Obsession: Ah yes, this brings me to my original point of the post.

The original point of that post was to show how British Airways Business Class...

The original point of that post was to show how British Airways Business Class flyers could earn a very healthy haul of AAdvantage Miles in the current promotion and to show how valuable those AAdvantage miles could be, compared to Avios, for long - haul reward flights.

Not exact matches

Actually, JD, your formula applies to almost every thread on any site; whatever the subject, the posts come in from all directions, with little to no concern for sticking to the point of the original article...

Some of the posters, encouraged by CNN in its skewed headline and interesting censorship in its quote from Ms. Rice's original blog posting (they omitted the phrase «I remain comitted to Christ»), seem to have missed the point.

The fact of the multiple interpretations, per my post and the original article, and the mere instance of your post, reinforces my point.

You missed the point of the original post.

Ty, you have actually just reinforced the point of my original post.

The point of this blog is just to save time looking for a great recipe because you will find it very quickly through different cupcake categories, but the instructions will be found on the original blog which you will visit by clicking the link under the photo of the cupcake on every post.

Original Post: The Ultimate List Of Weight Watchers Pizza Recipes With Points — 85 Healthy Pizza Recipes To Choose From

I concede that three games are a very small sample size to make definitive prognostications about our beloved Atsenal this season, however its very difficult from my vantage point to discredit the overall sentiments of the original post.

My issue is I just don't see any Ferrari's in the 2018 draft, which was the whole point of my original post.

Again, the whole point of my original response to the post was that there is, indeed, SOME evidence, and not NO evidence.

At that point, the site's main store of content was the original incarnation of Online Politics 101 (in individual chapters, not yet in PDF form), but the first really substantive blog post followed soon thereafter.

After finding a copy of the original script that included the initial structure online, Gelderblom loaded the film onto his computer, reassembled it along those lines (as he had no access to any previously deleted material, there is no additional footage in this version save for one repeated shot that was needed to help make a smoother transition between scenes at one point) and posted the results online.

These are abhorrent to many educators, but we must look reevaluate as a profession, and that was the point of the original post --(see article from Wall Street Journal).

It's true that the outcome of the rule may be that students become segregated based on parental involvement, BUT as I pointed out in my original post that is only true if the Charter Schools actually are better than the public schools.

I also would like to point out now (maybe it wasn't clear enough in the original post) that the N7 wouidn't be powered off of the same wire as the camera.

Since 2008 doing approx 1000 miles per year, I put it through an mot on the 10th January, it passed without advisories;; The underneath is very solid indeed and doesn't need any work, the current paint was done approx 7 years ago to a good standard but is not perfect, when it had a change from Albert Blue (traces of it around the battery boxes) to the current black;; It still has the US import sticker on the left side door post, the original chassis plate and the chassis stamp on the bulkhead are all there;; It drives very well, I've driven it for circa 40 miles with no problems;; It has 15» Fuchs alloys and the spare is a chrome steel wheel;; The rear end has been «modernised» at some point, I personally would remove the rear Porsche reflector and fit an original panel and bumper stops to get it back to the original pre impact bumper look, I could do this for you if required, cost circa GBP 800;; The seats have been changed to 80's leather recaros and the door cards to a later style, again I'd put some period seats in and back date the door cards if required at cost price;; The 80's recaros are worth good money so shouldn't be too much further expense if they were sold separately;; Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of money;;

This though was the point of my original post: i.e., that both print and digital readers have very good reasons for preferring to read in the formats they do, and to express the hope that each side will refrain from snarking about the other.

Also, (c), your original post did misrepresent the way eBooks are licensed in the process of making your point, which others have since corrected.

in this post is out of date now that you only get 50,000 UR points instead of the original 100,000 points that was offered when the card first came out.

But my original post estimated a cost of only 0.595 cents per point.

-LSB-...] my original post on this topic, «Fair Trading Prices for Points and Miles,» I explained these concepts, and I used some of the best points - earning credit cards available -LSPoints and Miles,» I explained these concepts, and I used some of the best points - earning credit cards available -LSpoints - earning credit cards available -LSB-...]

The number referred to is the number of data points; I interpret your original post as implying that you believe the value of the number is the small number in question — i.e., because 7 or 10 is a small number, the distinction is obscure.

I was responding to the original point which was the issue of whether there was a (maximum) level of CO2 that could be considered harmful (toxic was the word used in MacViolinist's post) irrespective of warming, and that therefore could be used as a guide for action.

These ideas aren't original to me; it seems sort of weird that I'm posting them (as an outsider) rather than someone who has a professional familiarity with them (as pointed out above, they're out there).

I've provided links throughout the original post and the comments following to sources that demonstrate each of the above points.

While our attention to WG3 has been attracted by conflict of interest, WG3's ability to function as a source of trustworthy information is arguably prejudiced even more greatly by its failure to comply with bias policies — a point neatly put by Morton as follows (see original post for more discussion)

In a post last week, Steve Goddard pointed out that in the original IPCC FAR in 1990, there was an interesting graph of satellite derived Arctic sea ice extent:

And an anonymous commenter to my original post pointed to this Portable Freeware discussion of whether Browzar is adware.

A fundamental problem we face (and several other interesting points of view are articulated in comments on my original post) is that several courts have taken the position that not every act of speeding 50 km / h over the limit is in fact racing; but in all cases I'm aware of, the court has held that on the facts of that particular case, racing was the appropriate charge, but they did not articulate what the criteria should be for deciding between racing and speeding.

Researchers at Check Point spotted a new variant of WannaCry that used a different kill switch domain (it pings it and if it finds it isn't registered, it activates the ransomware; for more details, check out the original post on this behavior).

It's not clear at this point which YouTube users have already received the dark mode option, though a number of commenters on the original Reddit posting chimed in to say that they've just received the new setting, too, along with the original poster.

A recent post on the Clearmatics website, titled «No, Bitcoin is not the future of securities settlement,» provides a point - by - point analysis of the original Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto from the point of view of the financial establishment, and a clear outline of the reasons why banks and mainstream financial institutions won't touch permissionless blockchain networks like Bitcoin.

While the original comment, made by XDA developer Arter97 in a PasteBin post, may have been taken a bit out of context, the developer further clarified his points on Twitter.

Comment after comment offers examples that prove the point of the original post; contributors quote self - serving data points to gain credibility points; some suggest solutions worth considering.

I encourage you though to reply about this post in my original post, (https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/12/topics/253794-how-do-i-just-start) as I would lie to keep this clean short, straight to the point, step by step recipe NOT from the perspective of an already successful investor like you all, but from the eyes of a newbie that is at ground 0!