Sentences with phrase «original response to the post»

Again, the whole point of my original response to the post was that there is, indeed, SOME evidence, and not NO evidence.

Not exact matches

2) Will my response to their post generate more bad press than the original post?

The process for doing this is not as easy as it could be, but each response gets attached to the original, while still being a standalone post in its own right.

That was the gist of my original response to the OP, and to tallulah13 when she posted the link yesterday.

Some responses to your original post: (1) Calvinists, yourself included, believe and teach that Christ only came to redeem the elect.

To everyone writing in here: Most of my responses have been to resonate with David's original post..To everyone writing in here: Most of my responses have been to resonate with David's original post..to resonate with David's original post....

@Poltergeist — Not precisely sure of the intent of the original evolved ligase post or your response, but is it safe to say that this study, as with other in vitro evolution research, is proof of concept, i.e. random variation and selection can and does yield novel functionality?

I say that to tell you my original response to David's post was not written out of hatred or bitterness, but out of the firm conviction that what people know is church is not the ecclesia Christ is building.

I think the Gospel Coalition's response to this matter has spoken more loudly than the original post.

I never said there was an external agent, my original post was intended as a response to another post, but I forgot to hit the reply button.

For continuity, this was a response in reference to Deuteronomy 13:6 - 10, which theresa had a question about.The Original post seems to have gone missing.

The original post was instulting people who believe in a god, and my response was to insutl that person, saying they had no friends.

I posted pictures of a big M&M s - stuffed chocolate cake on my social media last week and y ’ all went crazy for it!I get it — chocolate cake + buttercream + M&M s inside + more M&M s on top = MAGIC.That original cake was for a friend and not intended for the blog, but given the response, I thought you might like to know how to make your own!First things first.

Sara I really enjoyed reading your response and comparing it to the original post.

So if you use the Contact tab and feel like you haven't gotten a response in a reasonable amount of time, just leave a comment on any recent blog post telling me so, and I'll be sure to track down your original email.

Thanks for the response, but have you read the original post that I was referring to?

I have already posted these updates at the original post, but since some people only read the initial post, I felt it was only fair to the candidates whose activities I learned more about as a result of responses to the prior post to put this up as a separate article.

The purpose of this post is not to provide a detailed overview of IF or ketosis, but rather to address the following common questions I often get asked in response to the original post on what I ate:

However, in none of the responses has a credible or logically supported counter been made to the original post.

As yesterday's news set in that The Shape in the original Halloween, Nick Castle will resume the iconic role of Michael Myers again in the new Halloween movie, executive produced by John Carpenter and arriving in theaters in 2018, many fans questioned if the 70 - year - old Castle would need a walker for the film, to which a humorous response was posted by Castle's friend and associate Sean Clark (Horror's Hallowed Grounds, Convention All Stars).

Note: This post has changed significantly from its original form to reflect that K12, Inc. will continue to provide curriculum to COVA, and to allow for a response from K12 about COVA's recent decision.

The suggestion to fold my responses into the original post has made it much, much longer.

Hi Allison, I'm posting my response again (what I can remember of it anyway) because your original comment (and my response) were accidentally deleted yesterday... and I want to be sure you got my reply.

In rebuttal to the above response, I, like the original persons post, am a BOA, long term customer with all primary accounts theirs, plus 2 boa visa's.

I know people are impatient and good at leaping to conclusions using simplistic black or white views of the world but I think the responses to this original paper, such as Gavin's post above, are part of the process.

I would find the original post much easier to understand if information from the Response to Comment 6 was included.

Although you can also see that the post explains that this as being a «short paraphrase», this explanation was NOT part of the original post and was only added after the fact as a response to my comment # 12.

However, after McIntyre clarified his post today in response to the debate and after further verification of the original source material, it's now clear that he referenced the TAR first, the WMO next, and then back to the TAR.

Re Steven's comments (comment # 257)[Ed Note: See comments 254 through 274 at the original post for additional context regarding responses to Burt's comment # 253].

-LSB-...][Update: My original post, Burt Rutan's comments, and my responses to his comments have been copied here.

Now, reading Kaustubh's response to you below, it seems that you may have misrepresented that too - that is, the issue of «salinity» (a factor that is in fact specifically mentioned in the original post above - did you actually read that carefully?)

I read your original post and all of your responses to comments so far and most of the commenters posts.

It's a couple of days since the original post, how long is a decent interval to expect the authors to formulate a response?

Eli - As I mentioned in response to your original p = t post, real estate titles have typically originated in occupation by humans of originally unoccupied (by humans) land.

If you want to continue commenting on the Skeptical Science site, you'll need to respond substantively to the original posts and to other commenters» responses to you.

Based on my reading, I'll try to be as factual as possible: • you were invited to help with the list of attendees • you accepted and made recommendations • you inadvertently received Dr. Schmit's email response to the invitation (inadvertently in the sense that it should not have been circulated or should have been considered confidential) • from your post: «The original summary (similar to that which Fred posted) was made by me at the Lisbon event in response to a question concerning the absence of prominent AGW proponents.»

In response to some of the comments above: the conclusion as stated by Oreskes is stronger than my paraphrasing of it, and I've edited my original post to make this clear.

Because my original post included the link to this blog I am posting the comments and my responses.

Upon seeing Martindale's response, I was originally going to just update my original post.

Ars Technica has already amended its original post with a response to Facebook's statement, saying it contradicts several of its findings, including the experience of users who shared their data with the publication.

My response to the original post was within general context of overall public sentiment and even acknowledged that there is a market that doesn't mind paying high commission — however the younger market ie.