Sentences with phrase «original study paper»

The original study paper led to a proposed pronouncement.

Not exact matches

The original paper contains a wealth of links to studies conducted by businesses, universities, industry associations and the military that supported early - 20th - century leaders as they embraced the short week.
Studying the Bible, the original languages, the cultural context, what the writer was trying to say to his original audience and how they would have understood it, and other similar considerations may help us develop a better «paper theology».
C.D. had the original idea for the study and together with L.J.G. and S.B. was responsible for developing the research questions addressed in this paper, data analysis, and interpretation.
Although fraudulent research claimed a connection, repeated new studies ended in failure, and the original paper was dismissed.
Scientists from the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH) form part of the team which has just published a paper in the journal Scientific Reports, studying for the first time the original fossil remains conserved of «Peking Man.»
Then in 2011, Goddard engineer Donald Dichmann, who at the time worked for Applied Defense Solutions in Columbia, Md., and his co-authors began work on a paper reviewing the trade studies NASA made when it decided to move its Interstellar Boundary Explorer from its original orbit to a more stable position at another lunar - resonant orbit — P / 3 — where it's mapping the boundary between the solar system and interstellar space.
P - values are a notoriously difficult concept to grasp and are often misinterpreted, but the original paper's message was clear: A P - value, or α, below 0.05 is much weaker evidence that the results aren't wrong than people think; lowering it makes studies stronger.
This Replication Study has reproduced important parts of the original paper, but it also contains results that are not consistent with some parts of the original paper.
Editors» Summary: This Replication Study has reproduced some parts of the original paper but other parts could not be interpreted.
Therefore, JAMA Internal Medicine has published a lengthy notice of retraction and replacement, which explains the errors made in the original paper, and updated the first paper with a new version of the study.
That led to a 2016 study formally introducing the object, which is nicknamed for Tabetha Boyajian, now at Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, who was the lead author of the original paper and is a co-author of the new study.
Journalists know that the vast majority of their readers will never read the original paper, and don't care about what this study actually did and how it might compare to previous studies.
However, one of the panel's reservations was that ``... a statistical method used in the 1999 study was not the best and that some uncertainties in the work «have been underestimated,»...» The panel concluded «Based on the analyses presented in the original papers by Mann et al. and this newer supporting evidence, the committee finds it plausible that the Northern Hemisphere was warmer during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any comparable period over the preceding millennium.
Now the journal Nature Methods has finally responded to the controversy, publishing several critiques of the original study and officially retracting the paper after a review by four independent referees.
I don't know anything about that monkey study, but given your understanding of the rat study, I would need to see the original paper to be able to buy what you are saying.
With regard to this study the ADM document claims «no adverse effects were noted» but the authors of the original paper did not state this.
That paper, «Post-challenge blood glucose concentration and stroke mortality rates in non-diabetic men in London: 38 - year follow - up of the original Whitehall prospective cohort study,» Diabetologia, http://pmid.us/18438641, is a familiar one; it was cited in our book (p 36, fn 35).
In this paper, we reflect upon, revisit, and rethink the original guidelines for using digital technologies to prepare social studies teachers in an effort to facilitate theoretical and practical discussions that may, once again, serve as a foundation from which to approach the preparation and development of social studies teachers over the next few years.
In this paper, the authors reflect upon, revisit, and rethink the original guidelines for using digital technologies to prepare social studies teachers in an effort to facilitate theoretical and practical discussions that may, once again, serve as a foundation from which to approach the preparation and development of social studies teachers over the next few years.
This paper reports the results of an original study of district spending at the school level.
Like any other academic or high school paper, every case study is expected to be 100 % original and well structured.
When one of our customers needs a well - formatted custom thesis, we assign this task to the most reliable, responsible, and hard - working writers, who know that a high quality thesis paper should be based on the prior knowledge earned from studies, a literature review, and original insight.
This custom essay writing service is offered to students in an effort to reduce the function they have to do within a school semester or term to achieve a good grade and also this custom essay writing service also promise original function thereby avoiding plagiarism.The professional essay writers of this company has extensive experience in writing essays, research papers, case study etc and are...
Even on extremely short notice, we are able to provide creative and original university custom essays, research papers, case studies, article summaries, and other assignments.
Our writers are capable of writing original documents from scratch; they offer exclusive paper every time after thorough study.
The company «s write my case study for me services is aimed at meeting tight deadlines, providing superior quality and original papers to its clients.
Using admission essay help at our site, you receive original and interesting paper which is relevant to the chosen field of study and gains attention from the first words.
Assignmentcamp.com: This online web portal have employed a number of certified and highly qualified writers that help students in writing unique and original essays, dissertations, case study, coursework and term papers.
The purpose of composing this lengthy piece of paper is to showcase research and writing skills in your chosen field of study and present original work to the professor that will provide value to the academic community.
The study was conducted by the Cass Business School and the original research papers can be found here.
The 2014 policy paper builds on the original 2006 edition with additional studies, statistics and examples of effective policies to address the issue of injurious dog bites.
Despite the omission of pets from the original published papers, in other ways this study shows qualitative research at its best.
Approximately thirty original works on paper and eight oil - on - canvas compositions by Clyfford Still comprise the exhibition, along with sketch - oriented materials, related photographs, and examples of the artist's self - described «interpretive studies» executed in the middle and late 1930s in Pullman, Washington.
These artists have each produced a series of original artists» pages — an ongoing study in the freedom of the book form — and an astounding variety and diversity of paper - based artists» ideas have been published.
The sensitivity studies in the original paper didn't include that the no - dendro / no - Tiljander combination but that does not justify the claims made by Montford that such a combination was impossible or was not included because it undermined the results.
It is unfortunate that a followup paper even had to be published, as the flaws in the original study were so severe as to have rendered the study of essentially no scientific value.
The way I read the discussion here (sorry I have not read the original papers being discussed) is that the new work which showed a lower range of temperatures (Hegerl study noted in # 2) shows a 5 percent chance of the temperature going over 11 degrees F.
And, just as the original Mann et al «hockey stick» was followed by additional work leading to the «spaghetti diagram» of the IPCC in 2007 showing numerous similar reconstructions, with a robust common signal, we can expect that this new paper will for now serve as the standard, but will stimulate additional studies that motivate even stronger conclusions.
In other scientific fields, authors have been required to withdraw papers because they could not produce their original «lab notes» — > the daily handwritten diary of the procedures and results for their study.
If Forest, Stone and Sokolov wish to save face, in the instance that the original data can not be located and shared with the journal editor and study auditors, they could simply re-do the paper, with the same data sets extended to present time, and replicate their own results, publishing a new paper.
Both authors even admitted that their reconstructions aren't statistically valid (and that was kind of their point...) and McIntyre, at least, has stated that he regards many studies since then the same way he does the original 1998 paper because they basically use the same datasets and analysis (And I should add that he seems less opposed to the more recent studies, especially those that don't use data he finds suspicious...) They've stated their a priori reasons why they don't like the data they don't like.
Since the NOAA paper's publication, several studies as well as a reanalysis of the original NOAA work have affirmed the finding that there has been no hiatus in global warming.
Heads, you discover that the findings of an original study are largely correct, and no journal will publish your paper because there's no interest in learning that something is still true.
Every scientific paper that presents original research should concentrate on what new the authors have found out, but that must also be put in proper connection with other knowledge without spending too much space on speculations or discussing in length issues not studied in that particular work.
The choice of prior that I support for Forster & Gregory's 2006 study is that effectively used in the original paper, where the authors explained that it arose from their regression model and error assumptions.
Not only is the original study referencing Manns own work but in this rebuttal paper there are no less than 6 references to papers written by Mann and 4 by Gavin.
Jeffery Greenblatt, a Berkeley Lab author of the health benefits study, contributed to writing the original wedge paper and several follow - up papers.
SPPI co-publishes many of its «original papers» with the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change / C02 Science.
That listing is the original paper that the rebuttal paper is referring to, The rebuttal paper in this case is, Early Climate Change Consensus at the National Academy: The Origins and Making of Changing Climate (PDF)(Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, Volume 40, Number 3, pp. 318 — 349, 2010)- Nicolas Nierenberg, Walter R. Tschinkel, Victoria J. Tschinkel Technically I am not counting any of those listed under this section anyway.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z