The original study paper led to a proposed pronouncement.
Not exact matches
The
original paper contains a wealth of links to
studies conducted by businesses, universities, industry associations and the military that supported early - 20th - century leaders as they embraced the short week.
Studying the Bible, the
original languages, the cultural context, what the writer was trying to say to his
original audience and how they would have understood it, and other similar considerations may help us develop a better «
paper theology».
C.D. had the
original idea for the
study and together with L.J.G. and S.B. was responsible for developing the research questions addressed in this
paper, data analysis, and interpretation.
Although fraudulent research claimed a connection, repeated new
studies ended in failure, and the
original paper was dismissed.
Scientists from the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH) form part of the team which has just published a
paper in the journal Scientific Reports,
studying for the first time the
original fossil remains conserved of «Peking Man.»
Then in 2011, Goddard engineer Donald Dichmann, who at the time worked for Applied Defense Solutions in Columbia, Md., and his co-authors began work on a
paper reviewing the trade
studies NASA made when it decided to move its Interstellar Boundary Explorer from its
original orbit to a more stable position at another lunar - resonant orbit — P / 3 — where it's mapping the boundary between the solar system and interstellar space.
P - values are a notoriously difficult concept to grasp and are often misinterpreted, but the
original paper's message was clear: A P - value, or α, below 0.05 is much weaker evidence that the results aren't wrong than people think; lowering it makes
studies stronger.
This Replication
Study has reproduced important parts of the
original paper, but it also contains results that are not consistent with some parts of the
original paper.
Editors» Summary: This Replication
Study has reproduced some parts of the
original paper but other parts could not be interpreted.
Therefore, JAMA Internal Medicine has published a lengthy notice of retraction and replacement, which explains the errors made in the
original paper, and updated the first
paper with a new version of the
study.
That led to a 2016
study formally introducing the object, which is nicknamed for Tabetha Boyajian, now at Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, who was the lead author of the
original paper and is a co-author of the new
study.
Journalists know that the vast majority of their readers will never read the
original paper, and don't care about what this
study actually did and how it might compare to previous
studies.
However, one of the panel's reservations was that ``... a statistical method used in the 1999
study was not the best and that some uncertainties in the work «have been underestimated,»...» The panel concluded «Based on the analyses presented in the
original papers by Mann et al. and this newer supporting evidence, the committee finds it plausible that the Northern Hemisphere was warmer during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any comparable period over the preceding millennium.
Now the journal Nature Methods has finally responded to the controversy, publishing several critiques of the
original study and officially retracting the
paper after a review by four independent referees.
I don't know anything about that monkey
study, but given your understanding of the rat
study, I would need to see the
original paper to be able to buy what you are saying.
With regard to this
study the ADM document claims «no adverse effects were noted» but the authors of the
original paper did not state this.
That
paper, «Post-challenge blood glucose concentration and stroke mortality rates in non-diabetic men in London: 38 - year follow - up of the
original Whitehall prospective cohort
study,» Diabetologia, http://pmid.us/18438641, is a familiar one; it was cited in our book (p 36, fn 35).
In this
paper, we reflect upon, revisit, and rethink the
original guidelines for using digital technologies to prepare social
studies teachers in an effort to facilitate theoretical and practical discussions that may, once again, serve as a foundation from which to approach the preparation and development of social
studies teachers over the next few years.
In this
paper, the authors reflect upon, revisit, and rethink the
original guidelines for using digital technologies to prepare social
studies teachers in an effort to facilitate theoretical and practical discussions that may, once again, serve as a foundation from which to approach the preparation and development of social
studies teachers over the next few years.
This
paper reports the results of an
original study of district spending at the school level.
Like any other academic or high school
paper, every case
study is expected to be 100 %
original and well structured.
When one of our customers needs a well - formatted custom thesis, we assign this task to the most reliable, responsible, and hard - working writers, who know that a high quality thesis
paper should be based on the prior knowledge earned from
studies, a literature review, and
original insight.
This custom essay writing service is offered to students in an effort to reduce the function they have to do within a school semester or term to achieve a good grade and also this custom essay writing service also promise
original function thereby avoiding plagiarism.The professional essay writers of this company has extensive experience in writing essays, research
papers, case
study etc and are...
Even on extremely short notice, we are able to provide creative and
original university custom essays, research
papers, case
studies, article summaries, and other assignments.
Our writers are capable of writing
original documents from scratch; they offer exclusive
paper every time after thorough
study.
The company «s write my case
study for me services is aimed at meeting tight deadlines, providing superior quality and
original papers to its clients.
Using admission essay help at our site, you receive
original and interesting
paper which is relevant to the chosen field of
study and gains attention from the first words.
Assignmentcamp.com: This online web portal have employed a number of certified and highly qualified writers that help students in writing unique and
original essays, dissertations, case
study, coursework and term
papers.
The purpose of composing this lengthy piece of
paper is to showcase research and writing skills in your chosen field of
study and present
original work to the professor that will provide value to the academic community.
The
study was conducted by the Cass Business School and the
original research
papers can be found here.
The 2014 policy
paper builds on the
original 2006 edition with additional
studies, statistics and examples of effective policies to address the issue of injurious dog bites.
Despite the omission of pets from the
original published
papers, in other ways this
study shows qualitative research at its best.
Approximately thirty
original works on
paper and eight oil - on - canvas compositions by Clyfford Still comprise the exhibition, along with sketch - oriented materials, related photographs, and examples of the artist's self - described «interpretive
studies» executed in the middle and late 1930s in Pullman, Washington.
These artists have each produced a series of
original artists» pages — an ongoing
study in the freedom of the book form — and an astounding variety and diversity of
paper - based artists» ideas have been published.
The sensitivity
studies in the
original paper didn't include that the no - dendro / no - Tiljander combination but that does not justify the claims made by Montford that such a combination was impossible or was not included because it undermined the results.
It is unfortunate that a followup
paper even had to be published, as the flaws in the
original study were so severe as to have rendered the
study of essentially no scientific value.
The way I read the discussion here (sorry I have not read the
original papers being discussed) is that the new work which showed a lower range of temperatures (Hegerl
study noted in # 2) shows a 5 percent chance of the temperature going over 11 degrees F.
And, just as the
original Mann et al «hockey stick» was followed by additional work leading to the «spaghetti diagram» of the IPCC in 2007 showing numerous similar reconstructions, with a robust common signal, we can expect that this new
paper will for now serve as the standard, but will stimulate additional
studies that motivate even stronger conclusions.
In other scientific fields, authors have been required to withdraw
papers because they could not produce their
original «lab notes» — > the daily handwritten diary of the procedures and results for their
study.
If Forest, Stone and Sokolov wish to save face, in the instance that the
original data can not be located and shared with the journal editor and
study auditors, they could simply re-do the
paper, with the same data sets extended to present time, and replicate their own results, publishing a new
paper.
Both authors even admitted that their reconstructions aren't statistically valid (and that was kind of their point...) and McIntyre, at least, has stated that he regards many
studies since then the same way he does the
original 1998
paper because they basically use the same datasets and analysis (And I should add that he seems less opposed to the more recent
studies, especially those that don't use data he finds suspicious...) They've stated their a priori reasons why they don't like the data they don't like.
Since the NOAA
paper's publication, several
studies as well as a reanalysis of the
original NOAA work have affirmed the finding that there has been no hiatus in global warming.
Heads, you discover that the findings of an
original study are largely correct, and no journal will publish your
paper because there's no interest in learning that something is still true.
Every scientific
paper that presents
original research should concentrate on what new the authors have found out, but that must also be put in proper connection with other knowledge without spending too much space on speculations or discussing in length issues not
studied in that particular work.
The choice of prior that I support for Forster & Gregory's 2006
study is that effectively used in the
original paper, where the authors explained that it arose from their regression model and error assumptions.
Not only is the
original study referencing Manns own work but in this rebuttal
paper there are no less than 6 references to
papers written by Mann and 4 by Gavin.
Jeffery Greenblatt, a Berkeley Lab author of the health benefits
study, contributed to writing the
original wedge
paper and several follow - up
papers.
SPPI co-publishes many of its «
original papers» with the Center for the
Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change / C02 Science.
That listing is the
original paper that the rebuttal
paper is referring to, The rebuttal
paper in this case is, Early Climate Change Consensus at the National Academy: The Origins and Making of Changing Climate (PDF)(Historical
Studies in the Natural Sciences, Volume 40, Number 3, pp. 318 — 349, 2010)- Nicolas Nierenberg, Walter R. Tschinkel, Victoria J. Tschinkel Technically I am not counting any of those listed under this section anyway.