But as outlined in a report published this month based on newer data from ISO - NE, ISO - NE's
original study suffered from methodological and data - based flaws that render its results erroneous.
Not exact matches
Because three of the
original eleven identified subjects in this
study meeting the Pigeon2 screening criteria had sleep apnea rather than insomnia, being able to identify and eliminate subjects
suffering from sleep apnea was important for achieving accurate results.
Although I am pretty sure that Phil Jones's career as a scientist will
suffer permanent damage as a result of the hacked e-mail revelations, I am heartened by the fact that his own research reexamining the data came to a different conclusion 18 years after the
original study.
From what I understand, nearly all subsequent multiproxy - based
studies suffer from the same deficiencies as the
original hockeystick, because they all use the same problematic proxies.
I would suggest that looking at the
original «casual» logic construct here in regards to the Curry, Webster and Holland
study suffers a similar condition.