In addition, the remarkable similarities between Christianity and
other Mystery Religions of the time suggest that Christanity was an evolutionary hybrid of Jewish Messianism with pagan Savior God mythology.
Not exact matches
The liturgical heritage of Judaism, the psychological and practical needs of the worshiping group, and the inexorable pressure of ideas and customs in the Mediterranean world, especially in the
mystery religions, presaged the development in Christianity, as in
other faiths, of ritual and sacrament.
On the
other hand, there is no God of a religious tradition cut off from critical reflection so that «it is wrong for
religion's advocate to confound the object of this affirmation with the modalities of the affirmation; it is wrong for him to believe that the transcendence of the divine
mystery is extended to the materiality of the expressions that it takes on in human consciousness; with greater reason it is wrong for him to consider that his problematic is canonized by this transcendence.
The mind is always looking to «solve» things and when you dissolve your life into Christianity or any
other religion, the main
mystery is «when Jesus is returning».
[50] Christian theology of
religions, on the
other hand, «studies the various traditions in the context of the history of salvation and in their relationship to the
mystery of Jesus Christ and the Christian Church.»
Polytheisms, essence
religions and
mystery cults, on the
other hand, invoke unalterable forces and eternal returns; they attribute events to inevitability, inscrutability and whim.
Hence, if we situate the call of Abraham, as well as
other special revelatory moments of the history of
religion, within the wider context of cosmic evolution, this may help soften the «scandal of particularity» associated with any unique or distinctive summoning by God of a particular people to bear witness in a novel way to the divine promise and
mystery that come to expression first in the very creation of the world.
In the
religion of the twice - born, on the
other hand, the world is a double - storied
mystery.
In our dialogue with
other traditions, the key to sustaining conversation (rather than cutting it short by claims that
others will interpret as arrogant) is to keep before ourselves the possibility that in some way or
other all
religions may be relative, culturally specific ways of looking toward an ineffable
mystery.
Each of the four ways must be critically connected with the
other three, or else it runs the risk of losing its religious character altogether (if by «
religion» we mean a receptivity to the reality of sacred
mystery).
And we articulated the second objection by insisting that a Christian theology of revelation must not be isolated from the revelation of
mystery as it occurs in the sacramental, mystical, silent, and active features of
other religions as well.
These four temptations of
religion, all of which in the extreme would frustrate any revelation of
mystery, can be thwarted only if each religious way allows itself to be nourished by the
other three.
Some of these have affinities with Jewish proselyte baptism,
others with the practice of circumcision, and still
others with certain aspects of the «
mystery religions `.
Others have argued for a «pluralist» approach, suggesting that no
religion can claim a preferential position, but that the Divine
Mystery, who is revealed in each religious tradition, is never fully apprehended and that each faith tradition witnesses to aspects of the divine glory.
He who has penetrated the
mystery of
religion will cease wanting simply to convert the believers among the
other high
religions; moreover, his desire is twofold, to give and to receive, to represent the purest form of Christianity to
others and in turn to learn about the most intimate character of the belief of
others.
The fact that
mystery bears the character of futurity, however, does not make prophetic
religions less mystical than any
others, if by mysticism we mean a longing for and experience of union with ultimate reality.
Others are convinced that for the most part people have at least some sense of a dimension of
mystery and that therefore
religion, understood broadly as a «sense of
mystery,» still lives on with almost the same degree of explicitness as it has in the past.
Jewish Christians understood their faith quite differently from Greek Christians, and among the Greeks
other differences emerged reflecting backgrounds, for example, in the
mystery religions on the one hand and classical philosophy on the
other.