Sentences with phrase «other animals so»

The dogs were selectively bred to be able to herd cattle and other animals so that farmers and ranchers could keep up and maintain larger herds.

He also needs enough exposure to other animals so that he is at least reasonably calm and controllable when passing them on the street.

Let your furry buddy meet a variety of people and other animals so that he can grow up to be calm and confident in various settings.

And if the dog couldn't eat the whole food all in one setting, then it could always be buried in hopes of keeping its scent away from other animals so it could be consumed later.

Immediately upon rescuing the cat (or dog), put him into a quiet room in your house, away from all other animals so that he can deal with the shock of change from either life on the street or being suddenly separated from his prior family and home.

«It was important that we work closely with Tobi on his aggression with other animals so that he could find his forever home,» said Tom Jacobs, Executive Director.

Shar - Poo puppies can grow into stubborn little dogs that don't play nice with kids and other animals so early socialization is crucial.

It also means working hard to socialize them to new people, places, vet offices and other animals so they feel safe in their world.

Nor are the other animals so non-rational and we so rational that the others are there only for our good.

There is nothing like that in the other animals so far as we can suppose.

Not exact matches

«This kind of deception is common in our society, but it is so difficult to prove that any other animal does it,» said lead researcher Aliza le Roux, a behavioral ecologist at the University of the Free State in South Africa.

The person who eats 400 pounds of animal meat every year is treading on the environment for others, and so a meat tax could be implemented as a matter of protecting personal liberty.

GFI reports that as their scientists investigate further, they have become more optimistic — because clean meat is so much more efficient than animal - based meat.102 One of their senior scientists, Dr. Liz Specht, has met with venture capital firms and other venture investors to present technology plans of specific clean meat companies and their pathways to commercialization.103 GFI further reports that, based partly on her analysis, many leading venture capital investors and firms have become much more interested in clean meat companies.

Additionally, GFI is focused on helping animals in the medium and long term, and we have not published estimates of the medium - term or long - term impacts of any other charities, so we worry including this in a cost - effectiveness calculation would be unfair to those other organizations.25 That being said, our lack of a cost - effectiveness estimate doesn't necessarily indicate that this charity has lower overall cost effectiveness than the charities for which we have completed a cost - effectiveness estimate.

Other fears like people marrying animals, the Eiffel Tower, and so on are not possible for the same reason.

So you believe that humans have something that sets them apart from other animals, what you call a * soul *?

There are even studies with pre-verbal children (haven't been socialized to religion yet) and other but non-human social animals that show that morality, if you accept that a sense of fairness and preferring «nice» over the opposite are proto - morals, then indeed it is evolution that makes it so.

Ecclesiastes 3:19 Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both: As one dies, so dies the other.

After the other animals Genesis 1:25 - 27 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and the cattle after their kind... And God said, Let us make man... So God created man in his own image.

That said: «But god did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good for the man to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evil.

Many, many other animals show love and many other emotions, so all animals are made in gods image?

He vetoed the consumption of prawns, those bizarre other - worldly creatures which no member of the faithful had ever seen, and required animals to be killed slowly, by bleeding, so that by experiencing their deaths to the full they might arrive at an understanding of the meaning of their lives, for it is only at the moment of death that living creatures understand that life has been real, and not a sort of dream.

The message is startlingly clear: we were given plants and fruits for food, and so were all the other animals who have «the breath of life» in them.

Others do no believe that killing animals is necessarily so bad that it should be given up altogether.

So I went back and repeated it, with the lamp intentionally switched off this time, and the animal would not react to the (absent) stimulus at all, which is exactly what you would expect, but is also showed that the animal was not using some other cue to figure out the «right» response.

scot, It's one thing to believe so deeply that you eschew evolution or the biological fact that humans are animals, it's entirely another to willfully misrepresent statements by others to support your position, and to deride and taunt people with other positions.

So we are to assume that the shepherd left the flock in the care of other shepherds who shared the fold with him and went off to look for the missing animal.

In the Summa Theologiae, Aquinas does not mean to say that natural law is shared by all animals including human beings» the natural law, as the «participation of the eternal law in the rational creature,» pertains only to human beings (I - II, 91.2)» but that natural law includes natural inclinations shared by other animals, «such as sexual intercourse, education of offspring, and so forth.»

The «pro-life» ideology might also include being a vegetarian, not so much to spare the lives of animals as for other health - and conservation - related reasons.

So now we know that man was not created by a God, nor was any other animal.

Just as we saw that in healthy - mindedness there are shallower and profounder levels, happiness like that of the mere animal, and more regenerate of happiness, so also are there different levels of the morbid mind, and the one is much more formidable than the other.

How about things like taking better care of the environment, advancing medicine, teaching children to be kind to other people and animals, and so forth?

In a work recently completed, but not yet published, I have explained how the adaptability of animal bodily systems, especially the brain, which Meredith and Stein have remarkably demonstrated in respect of the senses in their The Merging of the Senses and which is seen in infant language - learning in a way discussed by Meltzoff, Butterworth and others, reaches a peak in the case of the human use of language so that it is solely semantic and communicational constraints which determine grammar and nothing universal in grammar is determined by neurology.

One can reach a point in which it makes sense to remind one's grandma on Christmas Eve that «the fate of human beings is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both: As one dies, so dies the other.

Things are seriously mixed up in our country if Tebow is seen as someone who should be scorned, when so many other pro athletes abuse drugs, abuse their wives, abuse animals, and commit crimes on a regular basis yet the public seems to be just fine with overlooking that behavior.

His duty is to so direct his own affairs and so to have regard for all other creatures as to develop a future in which there is peace not only between man and man but between man and animal and between man and the whole delicate system of relations that makes the earth a cradle of life.

Some look back to Genesis and see that God gave Adam animals to name so they plan to be very busy in the garden others hang onto simply worshiping God all day long.

Often, the same - sex pairs help raise the offspring of other animals, so they are helpful to the herd or flock.

So, the flood was probably incredibly huge and localized such that it wiped humanity out other than Noah and family (along with the animals which humanity was in contact with).

The bottom includes the other species whose habitat is daily reduced and the domesticated animals who are brutally treated so that our meat will be cheap and tender.

As the devotees give themselves to their god, using some token for their oblation such as a human life, an animal, grain, a dance or other ceremonial, so the god responds to their action by relating himself afresh to them in a helpful and enriching fashion.

He has fore - thought, so that he can act purposively with a longer range of the future before him than any other animal that we know.

Human psychology differs greatly, to be sure, not only because we have much less access to the psyches of other animals, but also because their mentality is so much less developed, so that they — at least most of them — seem incapable of entertaining norms as such, The difference is, nevertheless, one of degree, not of kind.

It seems to me so obvious that some things are literally true about nature — for example, that there are all those other animals.

These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm, none of the sort, so they have no real answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from, as where did they first come from?

Consider, then, the sky and earth and the whole world as containing animals in the way in which worms are sometimes contained in the human intestines — worms or men, if you please, who ignore sense and feeling in other things because they consider it irrelevant with respect to their so called knowledge of entities.

Some believe that the 90 % of our brain which we do not use is not simply empty matter in our skulls, but may have originally been the parts of our brain that communicated with the spiritual realm of the angels so that through them we could communicate with each other, with God, with the animals, with the plants, and even with the forces of nature (For more on this theology of angels, see «The Powers Trilogy» by Walter Wink.)

The idea being if the problem is coyotes, WS should avoid killing so many other animals.

An all powerful, all wise god made it so animals had to die to feed other animals.

So, Adam and Eve eat of the fruit of knowledge and animals started eating other animals?