Sentences with phrase «other anthropogenic emissions»

Not exact matches

Parties are encouraged, where possible, to reduce anthropogenic emissions and enhance removals from terrestrial, coastal, and marine ecosystems, ensuring synergies with other environmental objectives.

I reject the idea that it is somehow inappropriate to acknowledge that catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is not only possible but plausible if we continue with anything close to business as usual consumption of fossil fuels and the other activities that are contributing to ever - increasing GHG emissions.

WRT human contribution to observed warming circa 2014 Gavin Schmidt indicates the human contribution is likely 110 % of observed due to the cooling effect of anthropogenic SO2 emissions (and other).

Concerns over permanence are rooted in the idea that emission reductions are potentially reversible due to forests» vulnerability to fires, pest outbreaks, changes in management, and other natural and anthropogenic disturbances.

On the other hand, we know that there is a good deal of deforestation going on, which works in the opposite direction (and which is included in the estimates of anthropogenic CO2 emissions).

It doesn't include other anthropogenic forcings, such as deforestation or methane emissions.

But you assert: «as long as the increase in the atmosphere is only halve the emissions, there can't be any other (net) source, as nature as a whole acts as a sink «And it is important to note that in this assertion, when you say «the emissions» you mean «only the anthropogenic emissions».

The only thing I see is that the ocean temperature has had its oscillations but has generally increased at a constant rate since 1900 but other literature show anthropogenic emissions have increased exponentially from 1900 to 2006 I see no correlation between a straight line and an exponential curve.

Some of the budget estimates also make an allowance for the effects of anthropogenic emissions of warming gases other than CO2, such as methane.

there is no correlation between anthropogenic emissions of CO2 and global temperature but if one were directly causal of the other they would correlate, 6.

For the scenario representative of the years 2011 — 2013, the boundary conditions include anthropogenic sources of SO2 generated from Asia that are transported across the Pacific Ocean, emissions from ships in shipping lanes, along with sources from other states surrounding the SoCAB.

Karlsson claims that «human emissions of carbon dioxide and other anthropogenic greenhouse gases is [sic] a substantial influence on the current warming trend.»

Regarding all the other sources of CO2, it is very true that anthropogenic emission are very much smaller than natural emissions, but natural emissions are well balanced by natural sinks.

The devotees of both sides of the mainstream climate debate i.e. on the one hand those who warn against the dangers of global warming, which they attribute mainly to atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide, and on the other those who assert that the theory of anthropogenic global warming is a fraud, resort to hysteria when they sense that their ideas are under threat.

But it transpired before long that it will take a lot of time to decrease the anthropogenic pressure by reducing CO2 and other hothouse emissions in order to stabilize the atmospheric level, and that the industrialized countries were not likely to cope with this task on their own.

What is odd in climate science is a unique situation, never encountered in any other scientific field but in religious congregations: the scientific objective as well as the interpretation of research output has been put in the hands of a panel of experts, the IPCC, under an official mandate to take care of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.

Air capture for negative net CO2 emissions would follow the decarbonization of our electricity system and other large anthropogenic point sources and assumes abundant and inexpensive non-carbon energy sources.

Regarding text on CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in 2011, and anthropogenic net CO2 emissions from land - use change throughout the past decade, Saudi Arabia proposed also discussing other gases, sectors and sources, and addressing confidence levels and representative timeframes.

Some involve a poor understaning of climate dynamics, whereas others may involve a wish not toaccept the evidence for a strong role of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in determining the temperature of our climate system.

Among other things, for instance, the parties to the UNFCCC agreed that: (a) They would adopt policies and measures to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, (b) Developed countries should take the first steps to do this, and (c) Nations have common but differentiated responsibilities to prevent climate change, (d) Nations may not use scientific uncertainty as an excuse for not taking action, and (e) Nations should reduce their GHG emissions based upon «equity.»

First, the complicated models that develop emissions scenarios don't seem to be necessary for forcing the climate models; simply specifying a value of CO2 concentration (with the other greenhouse gases and anthropogenic aerosol) at 2100 along with a simple time trajectory is sufficient to force the climate model.

Assessment of fossil fuel carbon dioxide and other anthropogenic trace gas emissions from airborne measurements over Sacramento, California in spring 2009

Any warming observed prior to WWII is indicative of «global warming» (GW), but (since there were no significant human GHG emissions yet) is counterindicative of anthropogenic greenhouse warming (AGW), since something other than human GHGs caused it, raising the question: if non GH warming caused this warming, could it not also have caused the most recent extended warming period?

«since the mid 1980s a significant increase in visibility has been noted in western Europe (e.g. Doyle and Dorling, 2002), and there are strong indications that a reduction in aerosol load from anthropogenic emissions (in other words, air pollution) has been the dominant contributor to this effect, which is also referred to as «brightening».»

It's also the only plausible timing — the CO2 emissions (and other alleged anthropogenic effects) were simply insignificant before roughly the middle of the 20th century.

Certainly, CO2 and other anthropogenic GHG emissions are a potent driver of warming, with water serving in a feedback role due to its short atmospheric lifetime.

Therefore, we argue for inclusion of GHG fluxes from reservoir surfaces in future IPCC budgets and other inventories of anthropogenic GHG emissions.

The results in your publications and the ones presented in your blog give no reason to believe that anthropogenic CO2 or any other emissions are involved in global warming.

«(n) the promotion of sustainable settlement and transportation strategies in urban and rural areas including the promotion of measures to --(i) reduce energy demand in response to the likelihood of increases in energy and other costs due to long - term decline in non-renewable resources, (ii) reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, and (iii) address the necessity of adaptation to climate change; in particular, having regard to location, layout and design of new development.»

The loud divergence between sea - level reality and climate change theory — the climate models predict an accelerated sea - level rise driven by the anthropogenic CO2 emission — has been also evidenced in other works such as Boretti (2012a, b), Boretti and Watson (2012), Douglas (1992), Douglas and Peltier (2002), Fasullo et al. (2016), Jevrejeva et al. (2006), Holgate (2007), Houston and Dean (2011), Mörner 2010a, b, 2016), Mörner and Parker (2013), Scafetta (2014), Wenzel and Schröter (2010) and Wunsch et al. (2007) reporting on the recent lack of any detectable acceleration in the rate of sea - level rise.

• More than 100 % (i.e. GHG warming has been partly offset by aerosol cooling) • Between 76 % and 100 % • Between 51 % and 76 % • Between 26 % and 50 % • Between 0 and 25 % • Less than 0 % (i.e. anthropogenic GHG emissions have caused cooling) • There has been no warming • Unknown due to lack of knowledge • I do not know • Other (please specify)

But interpretation isn't easy, since internal variability and forcings (natural and anthropogenic) other than CO2 can move individual points up and down on the temperature axis without any movement left or right along the cumulative CO2 emissions axis.

We call on all people and nations to recognize the serious and potentially irreversible impacts of global warming caused by the anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants, and by changes in forests, wetlands, grasslands, and other land uses.

In order to better understand the causes of the Arctic's changing climate, the authors used observational data and nine CMIP5 global climate models to tease apart the effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, natural forcings and other anthropogenic forcings (aerosols, ozone and land use changes).

In other words, scientists are not providing support or confirmation for the narrative that says the post-1940s anthropogenic CO2 emissions increase has coincided with unusual, unprecedented, or alarming glacier retreat.

One of the dangers identified by the report is a reduction in calcification of coral and other marine organisms as a result of anthropogenic climate change and in particular increased CO2 emissions.

The rate of increase has recently slowed to nothing as temperature rise has stalled, the rise in anthropogenic emissions has stalled (as a result of economic recession), and many other changes may have happened..

That means when it comes to clouds anthropogenic forcing is not limited to GHG emissions, but also includes [other forms of] air pollution.

The scientific outcomes from this workshop will be used first and foremost to strengthen the case for greater action to reduce anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide related to climate change and ocean acidification while also reducing other stressors.

Longer historic warming trends indicate that carbon dioxide emissions and other anthropogenic greenhouse gases are rapidly warming the planet — so it's not just complex weather systems like El Niño.

So, other possible explanations the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration other than the anthropogenic emissions deserve investigation.

Net - zero emissions will require carbon capture and storage (CCS) for all fossil fuels and other technologies (e.g., biomass with CCS or direct air capture) for residual emissions from fossil fuel extraction and from other anthropogenic sources such as agriculture.

In other words, over the past third of a century — the period with the greatest amount of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions — the behavior of the real world (i.e., reality) falls far below the average expectation of climate models and, in fact, is clearly

Anthropogenic emissions Ea are what they are, no component of it can be «moved to the other side of the equation».

On the other hand, we know anthropogenic emissions are more than enough to explain all of the observed rise (and then some).

«n this and the other thread I have repeatedly pointed out that the observed dynamics of the seasonal variation indicate that the dynamics of the short - term sequestration processes can easilly sequester ALL of the anthropogenic and natural emission in each year.

The C2 rise ay be mostly caused by the anthropogenic emission, or the temperature rise, or several other factors.

Salby says that since anthropogenic emission does not correlate with temperature, the rise must be due to other emission that does correlate, and he goes on to quantify how much of the emission can be explained by this other emission based on that correlation.

In this and the other thread I have repeatedly pointed out that the observed dynamics of the seasonal variation indicate that the dynamics of the short - term sequestration processes can easilly sequester ALL of the anthropogenic and natural emission in each year.

Welcomes the agreement achieved by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol on its work pursuant to decisions 1 / CMP.1, 1 / CMP.5 and 1 / CMP.6 in the areas of land use, land - use change and forestry (decision - / CMP.7), emissions trading and the project - based mechanisms (decision - / CMP.7), greenhouse gases, sectors and source categories, common metrics to calculate the carbon dioxide equivalence of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks, and other methodological issues (decision - / CMP.7) and the consideration of information on potential environmental, economic and social consequences, including spillover effects, of tools, policies, measures and methodologies available to Annex I Parties (decision - / CMP.7);