But
other archaeologists argue that the bones — with no obvious signs of injury or strenuous physical activity — are too pristine to have seen battle.
Not exact matches
He denies taking credit for
others» discoveries,
arguing that he was required to scrutinize all results before they were announced to the media, to prevent unscrupulous
archaeologists from making false claims.
Although some
archaeologists argued that the human capacity for symbolic expression developed over time in Africa,
others felt that the European creative explosion reflected a new leap in human abilities.
Others argue that archaeology doesn't need to be concerned only with the past;
archaeologists might be uniquely qualified to study how humans (even living humans) use their environment and material things, regardless of time.
Still, I don't like
arguing about evolution, because I understand that even professional
archaeologists and anthropologists are constantly contradicting each
other and can't come to a complete consensus.