Sentences with phrase «other arguments fail»

Not exact matches

Obviously, so the argument goes, if we want to cut teenage pregnancies and abortions we must have access to sexual health services — in other words, teenagers are less likely to get pregnant if they are using contraception; failing contraception, then we should give them access to the morning - after pill, which may be seen as preferable to a twelve - year - old getting pregnant.

You tried to claim otherwise the other day, but you never actually had any argument, every point you tried to make was shot down because there was no logic or reason behind it, so you failed.

If it fails to satisfy that requisite, if it has to make up for its weakness in argument by handling the sword, it needs no other argument for its falsification.

On the other hand, if we do not assume divine temporality, the argument fails.

But, failing that, I shall merely show your arguments are ludicrous to the other readers, and ask you to try another one.

Indeed, there is considerable merit to the argument that Dole's lukewarm approach to late - term abortions and other social issues failed to mobilize the full potential of the traditionalist vote.

thefinisher1 If babies are born atheist, and would remain atheist until they are taught to believe in a god who introduces various reasons to hate others, then your argument fails.

By failing to realize the difference between «equivalent» and «identical» in Whitehead's argument, by failing to see that Whitehead has already established the fact that the regions contained in other regions are not always topologically equivalent regions, he summarily lumps all abstractive sets into one set.

I will sometimes point out when I think one side misstates the other's position or ignores how an argument will fail given the assumptions of the other side.

He ignored my tuition and failed to see the non-sequitor of his argument; he stated that the object of playing football was to win games and that if a team won more games than any others, like Chelsea had, then clearly they were playing «gooder» football than anyone else!

If the only way you can argue is by making strawmen of other peoples arguments then you fail.

Indeed while it might fare well in a comparison with the unproductive House of Commons, the effectiveness over accountability argument is failing in other areas of public life which is why we now have elected Mayors and Police Commissioners.

Mr. Silver's central argument seems likely to be that the government failed to prove that a quid - pro-quo relationship existed between Mr. Silver and others who prosecutors said benefited from official actions he took on their behalf.

Such arguments have failed to convince the Community, which wants to help poverty - stricken fishermen and stop overfishing by giving fishermen other occupations.

As an argument, it fails to acknowledge that there are many other, and far more interesting, points of data that can be used by teachers, parents, and schools to keep far more compelling tabs on student progress throughout the year.

Other students fail to gather the resources for their research, while some of them are having issues with finding the solutions for the arguments that are raised in topic by the students.

I think I understand your argument, BUT you make two assumptions and fail to note a third: 1 - Paying a 25 % tax now if you think you will be in a higher bracket later, 2 - That tax rates will remain stagnant or go down, 3 - failing to account for the other advantages of Roth accounts particularly for estate purposes.

There are some arguments that flare up over people who fail to understand the etiquette of taking turns, but even these are polite as other gamers step in and explain that other people need to get some time as well.

That argument fails also, as long as we make assumption # 3 above, that UP temperatures are determined by CO2 and other moieties that will act in the same direction.

Spencer and Lindzen published several other papers making similar arguments in subsequent years, but these again failed to withstand scientific scrutiny (orange, black, and light blue in the first graphic).

It is a form of straw man argument you procure, and nothing that fails or damns anything, other than the waste of time of having had to read it.

By focusing on thermometer - based land observations only, and ignoring other evidence conflicting with their hypothesis, MM04 failed to address basic flaws in their arguments.

I agree, despite my posting links to half a dozen peer - reviewed papers on this topic so far, all documenting evidence to support my arguments, you have singularly failed to produce one piece of evidence, other than a link to a blog post.

There are much better arguments on other items where (C) AGW is on thin ice: climate models which fail on a lot of items like cloud cover, overestimate the influence of aerosols, can't cope with natural variability and therefore fail in their temperature forecasts.

These people do not know each other, which leads me to view them as inquisitors (or probably acolytes) of some religious Global Warming cult, armed with good sounding arguments to convince the unbelievers, and when that fails to use stronger methods.

Arguments in opposition to action on climate change based upon the claim that the United States acting alone will not significantly reduce the threat of climate change fails any ethical test because all nations have a duty to act to reduce their emissions to their fair share without regard to what other nations do.

Economic harm arguments made in opposition to Obama's climate plan, for instance, even if true, both fail to recognize the ethical obligations that the United States has to not harm others through our ghg emissions and to acknowledge the costs of not acting.

By your failed argument we can discount GRACE, and plenty of other satellite measurements — not to mention the wildly inaccurate ocean pH measurements that the lunatics are now trying to hang their collective hats on.

The skeptics, on the other hand, have little more than a political manifesto camouflaged as science (witness Crichton, Inhofe, Michaels, Tech Central Station, The Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Global Climate Coalition, etc.) In fact, as you suggest, the skeptic's arguments fail to rise to the level of a theory of climate at all.

Other arguments presented by the husband were found by the court of appeals to be based upon hearsay because he failed to provide the court of appeals with a transcript of the trial.

Or it may be when the RTDRS has failed to give either a landlord or a tenant «an opportunity to present evidence, submit arguments and question the other parties» (at para 53).

But while there are balanced practitioners textbook for every other field the main practitioners textbooks (Copinger & Skone James on Copyright ISBN: 9781847031280 and The Modern law of Copyright and Designs ISBN: 9781405717984) both fail to genuinely set out the law and the intellectual arguments in a comprehensive and sensible form.

Robert Andris, IP attorney and partner at Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley's Redwood City office, thinks Apple could fail with some arguments and succeed with others.

Four of the seven SCC judges reached the decision which was released July 31, while the other three declined to deal with the issue, ruling the constitutional argument shouldn't be considered because Julie Guindon, the lawyer who launched the appeal, failed to give proper notice to federal and provincial authorities.

It stacks up a heaving spec sheet just as specs begin to matter least, it introduces an all - glass design just as others start to move away from it, and, most importantly, it fails to provide a compelling argument for purchasing it ahead of HTC, Samsung, or even LG's alternatives.

If you fail to sit down and discuss finances, religion, sex, housing, your future, and other topics in great detail, you could end up with nothing but argument after argument for the rest of your days.

«Kitchen - sinking» occurs when you dump other issues to the conversational table — so a discussion about «failing to pick the kids up on time» leads to an argument about «not doing anything around the house» which jumps to «you never listen, even my friends commented about this» followed by «you'd rather be with your friends than me» which then leads to something else... you get the point.

[100] Among other arguments, the Collards had alleged that the Western Australian Government had breached equitable fiduciary duties by removing their children and failing to act in their best interests with respect to their custody, maintenance and education.

The court rejected Broker's argument, finding that Broker had waived its right to enforce its exit policy against Salesperson because it had consistently failed to enforce the policy with its other departing salespeople.