The argument that new spending was aimed primarily at minorities and disadvantaged students is similar to
other arguments in the RAND study: it bears some relationship to fact but lacks evidence and convincing analysis.
Labour MPs in traditional, working class seats, say the issue of immigration is drowning out
other arguments in the referendum campaign, including the remain campaign's central argument that leaving would hit jobs and economic growth.
Not exact matches
First, there were 125 men
in one large room... The men were very considerate of each
other, and I didn't hear a raised voice ever, much less an
argument.
The best advice I can give you is to try to make sure that you've got some board members and
other advisors (not investors) who've actually run businesses to help take your side
in some of the silliest of these
arguments.
But the
other «factual circumstances» here make the
argument less likely to hold up
in the same way it did for Edwards.
But it is the
argument that those who want bigger government, either through the CPP or
in other spheres, will ultimately have to make.
In other words, give your employees a pro-CSR argument that is grounded in their own values and belief
In other words, give your employees a pro-CSR
argument that is grounded
in their own values and belief
in their own values and beliefs.
Mr. Siegal's
other client successes include securing a 2016 trial victory
in federal court defending Marvel Entertainment against a claim that it stole a patent - holder's design for a Spiderman role play web - shooting toy, and numerous federal and state appellate
arguments in criminal and civil matters.
However, one of the
other signers of the declaration, Thomas McKean, denied the July 4th signing date and backed it up by illustrating a glaring flaw
in Jefferson's, Adams», and Franklin's
argument — namely, that most of the signers were not members of congress on July 4th and thus wouldn't have been there to sign it.
The suits are part of a group of at least four
other cases with similar
arguments in various courts around the country, and they make legal experts wary, particularly as the differences
in opinion seem to indicate their destiny to go before the Supreme Court.
That's the situation
in a courtroom -
arguments presented by one side will be directly (and mercilessly) attacked by the
other side.
On December 28, 25 - year - old Tyler Barriss called police
in Wichita, Kansas, falsely claiming he'd shot his father during an
argument and was holding two
other people hostage
in a home there.
However, on the
other hand, the
argument could be made that parodies
in the adult context would qualify for a fair use defense, as with
other parodies.
«Any
argument they make for keeping that
in would result
in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than
others?»»
In his book «The All - or - Nothing Marriage,» Eli Finkel, a psychologist at Northwestern University and a professor at the Kellogg School of Management, made a similar argument: Modern spouses look to each other for friendship, sexual fulfillment, intellectual growth — not just financial stability, like they did in years pas
In his book «The All - or - Nothing Marriage,» Eli Finkel, a psychologist at Northwestern University and a professor at the Kellogg School of Management, made a similar
argument: Modern spouses look to each
other for friendship, sexual fulfillment, intellectual growth — not just financial stability, like they did
in years pas
in years past.
In a fascinating post on The Conversation blog, Maynard makes an
argument that won't surprise anyone who has read any fictional account of human's interplanetary future — colonizing
other planets probably won't bring out the better angels of our nature, and any attempt to put people on Mars will require overcoming serious social and political problems, such as:
It is also a great strategy for dismissing an
argument or a speaker —
in other words, why should Trump have to answer Kelly's often very pointed questions when she is clearly unstable?
The billionaires fought about Herbalife and
other long - standing gripes
in an epic
argument that was televised by CNBC.
Shah's
argument about «an inferior competitive landscape» makes no sense, however, although it's of a piece with
other Tesla mega-bulls, such as Loup Ventures» Gene Munster, who seems to think that Tesla can basically sell 11 million cars
in the US alone.
While shouting over the opinions of
others may be a way to drive ratings, success
in business or
in life requires you to take a moment, consider why you might be wrong, and build your own
argument with the counterargument
in mind.
I'll leave it for
others to judge the merits of this
argument, but assuming it gains traction with regulators and policymakers — it was aired recently
in Congressional hearings over Keystone XL — it could actually be a good thing, long term, for Canada.
His
argument is basically that Canada's oil is ethically preferable to the oil produced
in other places, considering especially places with serious histories of human rights violations.
In other words, people for whom there is at least some social
argument that working less is a good thing.
All the while, these companies have made an overarching
argument that they should not have to follow the kinds of laws that every
other industry
in the country — very much including the ones that they are disrupting — follow.
It's intellectually honest to look at the
other side of any
argument but especially one
in which you have strong views.
The former workers» cases hinged on their
argument that the companies had violated clauses of the visa law requiring employers to show that hiring H - 1B workers «will not adversely affect the working conditions» of
other workers
in similar jobs.
Mulcair's
argument then becomes essentially that
in addition to costing taxpayers and the environment, oil and gas subsidies are also undermining
other export industries via the Dutch - Currency - Phenomenon - That - Shall - Not - Be-Named.
The plaintiffs» motion states that
in June 14 and 15 conference calls, counsel for the three sets of plaintiffs stated that they supported coordination or consolidation, «subject to the parties» agreement that these three cases will retain their separate identities, allowing each set of plaintiffs to file separate briefs, make separate oral
arguments, and independently make
other litigation decisions.»
You make the classic
argument that the benefits of a booming tradable sector such as oil and gas must, ipso facto, outweigh the decline
in other sectors — otherwise they wouldn't be generating enough demand to result
in an increase
in the country's currency.
Like
other loopholes
in gun laws, these have been
in large part buttressed by the typical pro-gun
argument that people should have these weapons to be able to defend themselves and their families.
The improved liquidity
argument also makes it important to avoid investing
in private placement real estate investment trusts (REITs) or
other similar vehicles because of the potential of «losing all their capital.»
For example, some time back HFT was blamed for higher volatility
in the cattle market, even though such trading represents a smaller fraction of cattle trading than it does for
other contracts, and especially since there is precious little
in the way of a theoretical
argument that would support such a connection.
The
arguments of Adair Turner and
others seem to me to depend on a notion that you are making some kind of permanent commitment with respect to future monetary policy by engaging
in money - financed fiscal policy.
The
argument from Gavin and
other who supported increasing the transaction capacity by this method are essentially there are economies of scale
in mining and that these economies have far bigger centralisation pressures than increased resource cost for a larger number of transactions (up to the new limit proposed).
This is why I don't believe
in bonds, ETFs, or any
other paper investment although you can make the
argument that stocks are paper investments.
For anyone interested, I summarized some of his
arguments in a September 16, 2012, blog entry,
in which among
other things I quoted the CEO of Fortescue as saying:
They consider a range of
arguments for owning gold, such as: (1) gold hedges inflation; (2) gold hedges currency decline; (3) gold is attractive when
other assets are not; (4) gold is a safe haven
in times of crisis; (5) gold is a de facto world currency; and, (6) central banks and investors
in aggregate are still underweighting gold.
On one hand, Norway's past eight years,
in which it had both a trade account surplus and a governmental fiscal surplus would seem to support his
argument; yet there are too many
other examples which do not confirm this theory.
And
in any case, it's not the
argument that Daines and Johnson and
other pass - through allies
in the Senate are making.
There's rarely enough nuance or context provided
in these
arguments because both sides of the aisle seem to portray the
other side as being the enemy
in the passive versus active debate.
In terms of other data, the overall tone for Europe was slightly negative, giving some weight to the argument that Europe was more exposed than the United States to the effects of weakness in emerging market
In terms of
other data, the overall tone for Europe was slightly negative, giving some weight to the
argument that Europe was more exposed than the United States to the effects of weakness
in emerging market
in emerging markets.
These and
other trends seem to make a good
argument for buying a home
in California earlier
in 2018, rather than later.
There's no question that investors have become nearly frantic
in their verbal
arguments about the permanence of elevated profit margins (which is something that Benjamin Graham observed at
other market peaks, and warned against decades ago).
Just as the
arguments for higher cost structures
in other industries have been washed away by the internet tsunami (go ask retailers or content providers), so too will the
arguments for premium pricing for institutional trades succumb to the inevitable erosion.
As I understand the
arguments, if I save a portion of my wage or
other income and keep it
in my mattress or
other «safe» place, I am accumulating «savings».
The class - struggle
argument, however, had much more resonance
in the days when stocks, bonds and
other wealth were held by a tiny minority while the masses struggled to buy food and pay rent.
In other words, your product's strategic value comprises the reasons and arguments buyers give to senior management and others in the company as to why the product should be purchase
In other words, your product's strategic value comprises the reasons and
arguments buyers give to senior management and
others in the company as to why the product should be purchase
in the company as to why the product should be purchased.
In the final analysis, Bertolini has one
argument that trumps all
others when he faces employee skepticism or even opposition to wellness programs.
On the
other hand, those family members have a significant financial and personal interest
in the long - term success of the company and certainly have an
argument for being at the table.
The
argument asking weather Islam is or can be a tolerant religion where people of this faith can live side by side with Christians, Jews, Hindu's and
other religions co-exist
in America is on the minds of most Americans.