Sentences with phrase «other arguments regarding»

«There are other arguments regarding the value of biodiversity, but these are a good initial two to ponder.»

However, one service's official position does not prevent others from disagreeing and putting forth other arguments regarding the stock.

Not exact matches

Other issues with the page stem from reliable sources, arguments on how the fork was initiated, and debates regarding the Segregated Witness protocol.

Other issues with the page stem from reliable sources, arguments on how the fork was initiated, and debates regarding the

There simply can not be «scientific» evidence or argument that tells one way or the other in regard to God.»

Tomorrow and Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases regarding same - sex marriage... one concerning California's Proposition 8 and the other the Defense of Marriage Act.

However, in addition to his official position regarding the deficiency of Premise X (that it is meaningless), Griffin's arguments and remarks suggest at least two other ways of understanding the vagueries of this proposition.

Then the lucid addition of «So Satan may not tempt you with your lack of self control» I mean one can easily make the rational assumption or argument that masturbation is a good remedy in this regard as well to help relieve the desires of the flesh that might other wise lead a married person to adultery.

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

As to the99declarations Tenth Amendment argument, there have been some SCOTUS decisions on term limits, among others regarding federal officials, and they concluded:

Hugh McLachlan rightly points out some logical flaws in philosopher David Hume's arguments regarding miracles, but introduces some others in...

This point in particular may be picked up by NGOs with regards to CRISPR and other gene editing techniques, so it would be good to think about arguments or publications which could be used as a response.

There appear to be two differing schools of thought regarding Metacritic; one argues that its inconsequential and its flawed nature means that it should be disregarded in an objective assessment of any games in question and the other school relies on its results to prop up its arguments, even if it makes an admission to the flawed nature of its findings.

And any rebuttals on Nicholas Nassim Taleb's arguments regarding the fallibility and fundamental flaws in this and other models used in the markets?

Also, regarding Horizon Zero Dawn, there are no arguments that it was visually the greatest, however there were other titles that may have been better in regard to story, art direction or soundtrack.

Arguments have raged online about the method used on the PS4 Pro regarding checkerboard rendering, which many people equate to upscaling but others disagree.

The notion made for a good segue into her essay «The Islands of Evasion: Notes on International Art English» (2003), included in Social medium as a response to arguments — from Hito Steyerl, Martha Rosler, and others — regarding the obfuscating language used in e-flux press releases and other explanatory art texts.

There were a number of problems that kept a consensus from forming around Wegener's ideas: he wrote a broadly synthetic work which did, indeed, contain many errors; he also used other people's conclusions as part of his argument, which US geologists of the period regarded as invalid methodology.

When a group of people claiming superior scientific knowledge and understanding refuses to grasp the extremely simple point I've been making regarding the heating capacity of an absence of volcanic eruptions, then I am forced to take all their other arguments with a huge grain of salt.

And one last note regarding the eternal «corporate» argument that also surfaced in the article above: People who develop Golden Rice and other GMOs are people who studied biology or agronomy, people who support Golden Rice are pediatricians and nutritionists — are those the kind of people we distrust?

Arguments in opposition to action on climate change based upon the claim that the United States acting alone will not significantly reduce the threat of climate change fails any ethical test because all nations have a duty to act to reduce their emissions to their fair share without regard to what other nations do.

In the report (PDF), which recants many of the popular skeptical arguments regarding climate change, Schwartz claims that [Al] «Gore's brand of over-the-top climate hysteria has nothing to do with reality,» and that «Most of the greenhouse effect is natural and is due to water vapor naturally in the atmosphere, as well as natural levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, and a few other greenhouse gases.»

Regarding your blog entry on the V+S paper, one statement needs clarification: ``... hurricane intensity has increased in recent decades as SST has risen (at least in the North Atlantic for which trends are most reliable) and this prediction is based on fairly fundamental and robust thermodynamic arguments explored by Emanuel and others for decades now.»

We need to see this as a war in order to begin mass production of wind turbines and other alternatives (without much regard to invalid arguments about costs).

In other words: — you must tighten the rules regarding the use of non-peer-reviewed material, in order to avoid embarrassing mistakes — you must relax the rules regarding the use of non-peer-reviewed material, in order to give more attention to the contrarian arguments

The House saw «no reason in law or logic why, leaving aside... the extreme cases of outright dismissal or walk - out, a contract of employment should be on any different footing from any other contract as regards the principle that «an unaccepted repudiation is a thing writ in water...»» The argument that the employee impliedly accepted the repudiation by working on under protest was rejected.

The AG's arguments regarding the necessity of reviewing the OMT and the drastic consequence of declaring it inadmissible for review, are certainly convincing, as any other decision would resemble a blanket authorization for powerful European institutions to govern with new non-legal policy measures.

Other topics addressed were recent cases concerning disgorgement (Kokesh) and the constitutionality of Administrative Law Judges (Lucia); the nature of assistance required to receive credit for cooperation; and observations regarding arguments by defense counsel that, in the Staff's view, may be conflating elements of the antifraud provisions of the securities laws.

Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants.

«There is still a lot of uncertainty regarding what must be disclosed, and regarding some other issues in terms of franchise liability,» she says, noting that rulings have sometimes been contradictory, and the arguments from franchisees can «create too many difficulties and burdens» for franchisors.

Trump's Thursday morning criticism regarding Amazon's impact on the Postal Service and other retailers are arguments he has taken online before, often alongside criticism of The Washington Post, which shares an owner — Jeff Bezos — with Amazon.

Even though the husband could confer with his attorney outside of the mediation process, the mediation would be more productive, if he were to have the attorney present for the sessions regarding support, as well as distribution of assets, to provide legal advice, and for the other side's attorney to hear his attorney's argument.