Sentences with phrase «other arguments we use»

We would oppose a patent application on any other onco - mouse on the other arguments we use against the Harvard mouse.»

Not exact matches

However, on the other hand, the argument could be made that parodies in the adult context would qualify for a fair use defense, as with other parodies.

DUBNER: So, to summarize your overall argument about our rise and fall of American growth: would it be an overstatement to say that there was a lot of low - hanging fruit — physical and labor, and all other kinds of fruit that we picked beautifully and ate hungrily, and we did really well with — and that those things, once used up, that kind of gain will never appear again as far as you can see?

The other side of this argument is that Trump is a master negotiator and is using this tactic to renegotiate trade deals.

Here, Hemel and Rozema's argument brings to mind earlier work by Lily Batchelder and others on the use of refundable credits versus non-refundable credits or deductions.

One of the things that may make Mr. Ham's arguments convincing for some is his use of other qualified scientists.

And please don't use Leviticus to support your argument unless you also keep Kosher, don't wear cotton polyester blends or each any veggies or grains that have been grown next other grains or veggies - all rules God sets out in Lev.

I used no circular argument... i noticed you did not critique anything i stated other than to call it circular.

Best of all, she suggests that people of faith do themselves and others a disservice when they use the bible selectively to bolster their arguments for specific political views and lifestyle prescriptions, using it «as a blunt weapon», as she puts it.

as with every other argument about christianity, if it really was only a belief it would be of no consequence, but unfortunately so many use their religious beliefs as an excuse to attempt to demand the rest of the population adhere to their beliefs by codifying them into civil law.

And if you want to use the argument that prayer has stopped other bad events happening then I say worship me because my will has stopped an extinction event meteor from striking the planet.

Using the most extreme analogy possible in an argument usually produces nothing productive — it only makes the other side of the debate get more defensive and inflammatory.

Obviously, so the argument goes, if we want to cut teenage pregnancies and abortions we must have access to sexual health services — in other words, teenagers are less likely to get pregnant if they are using contraception; failing contraception, then we should give them access to the morning - after pill, which may be seen as preferable to a twelve - year - old getting pregnant.

Think of the arguments you use, then apply them to the claim that Superman exists, or some other god.

To bolster the argument, in all of the other places in the Gospels where Jesus used the term «this generation,» he was referring to people living at that time.

@Scot That you found other scripture that contradicts the passages I cited just goes to show that the Bible is such a gargantuan collection of contradictions and adsurdities that it can be used to bolster just about any argument.

If two people are arguing about what qualifies as true «fruit» and one has apples in mind and the other has oranges, but they keep using the world «fruit» the argument quickly becomes quite messy.

As you see there is a christian c - o - c - k - s - u-c-k-e-r who likes to use other people's handle when they can't win arguments.

I'm ashamed to say that I used to sit in front of a House or Senate committee on Capitol Hill and say, «Every dollar you invest in Headstart will save $ 6.00 later on in higher productivity or in lower prison cost,» or some other obscene argument of that sort.

I only say that to say that if you are allowed your argument what prevents others from using the same argument about actions they don't want classified as sin.

So please, please, please do not promote religion by claiming that it maintains peace and stability - use other arguments.

i just know i use these same arguments A LOT — because a lot of atheists don't seem to want to read other atheists... which makes me wonder if they really know what they believe.

The former set, as well as many arguments made by Jerry and Jacob and others, are used in order to AVOID actual discussion or, in Jacob's case, try to make the person asking the questions (or offering counter-evidence) the bad guy.

They were oral traditions for centuries and not until it was put on paper did folks begin using one verse here and one verse there to create arguments that marginalize others that do not look and think just as the majority in power do.

Julie in Austin, (I actual used to go to school at the Jewish temple in downtown Austin) «In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach».

The symbolic nature of the struggle is stated succinctly in Roman's discussion of the 1917 constitutional congress: «Although other arguments were also used against the clergy, the issue returned time and again to the saving and the building of the nation and to destroying the ideological domination of the church» (italics added).55 Article 3.

But all of these texts are extremely difficult to interpret: crucial words remain obscure (e. g., authentein; exousia); the addressed situations are difficult to reconstruct; the «surface meaning» contradicts other Pauline material; and the methods of argument reflect cultural thought - forms no longer in use.

Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's posting much on this thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

He did not spend his time preaching what everybody already believed, but he used these common agreements in the formulation of arguments on other topics.

It's tempting to want to employ the same tactics and arguments or methods that have been used on us or others but that is a temptation we must resist.

And while I have learned quite a bit from my reading in these sources and still use quite a bit of those insights in my own teaching and writing, I have also read from various alternative perspectives on the Jewishness of Jesus, and have come to believe that these other perspectives have slightly better arguments and stronger positions.

I have just recently spoken to a prominient leader within the evangelical community in Scotland about such and his use of rhetoric, and misrepresentation of others and their views by straw man arguments.

bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: You can use dashes, spaces, or other characters to modify the «offending» letter combinations.

Too expensive, said others (an argument that politicians still use, apparently forgetting that we've managed to scrape together at least $ 150 billion to invade and occupy (Iraq).

Other commentaries brought out how the Pharisees probably had a bit of conundrum, because Jesus didn't actually grind any herbs or use any medicine and so the argument could have been made that he had not violated the Sabbath.

The alleged «silence» about the virgin birth from other New Testament authors can not be used as an argument against it since its factuality would have been revealed by Mary only after the resurrection and it did not constitute the centre of the Easter message; Redford even finds hints thatother New Testament authors framed their affirmations to allow for the virgin birth.

That is, what Frye calls «blatant literalism» and «vague transcendentalism» must be replaced by a new sense of the vitality of words and their use in other contexts than propositional arguments.

According to logician Trudy Govier, «The fallacy of equivocation is committed when a key word in an argument is used in two or more senses and the premises of the argument appear to support its conclusion only because these senses are not distinguished from each other.»

We may reconstruct the adjectives and phrases used to describe him both at the cocktail parties of the Corinthian elite (if the latter was aware of him at all) and in the pubs where his petit - bourgeois clientele would gather: «fundamentalist,» «simplistic,» «compulsive - neurotic,» «asking too much of sensible people,» «never listening to the other side of an argument,» «perhaps a little crazy» — in sum, some thing of a disagreeable fanatic.

And if we affirm that Jesus was true God and true man and believe that he rose bodily from the tomb, then logical consistency demands that we not use the Enlightenment's antisupernatural, deistic or naturalistic arguments against traditional views on the virgin birth, the miracle stories of the Bible, the presence of the Holy Spirit, the future return of Christ, prayer and others.

Yes, Chopra's argument is like saying that a computer gets it's computing power from somewhere mysteriously within the atoms of the silicone, iron, and plastic used to manufacture it, and not from the integrated circuits and other large components.

Its funny how the same arguments used against Scientology can invariably be applied to any other philosophy.

If one atheist somewhere on the internet said something, then, since all atheists agree with him / her, I can use that randomly selected example as an argument to address all other atheists.

Raison's Filter Fiber © (joking about the copyright)-- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

You can't prove difinitively using scientific method where life came from and yet you (not necessarily YOU, but others on this blog who support your argument) call me arrogant or moronic because I point to a creator, which I can not prove scientifically either.

Whitehead's argument against it depends on the assumption that Plato was no wiser in his use of this analogy than Plotinus and the other neo-platoni5ts.

Here, however, Job faces a contradiction between the friends» argument that a covenantal relationship is «defined by humility and passive acceptance of the misfortunes God may use to discipline him,» and God's approbation of Job for his other covenantal virtues, «including strong words and fierce resistance.»

And while there is always disagreement on the varieties of preparation, such as whether one should use a dry rub or a wet rub and various other culinary arguments, all of the many sauces used in America generally will fall into one of those four basic groups.»

JW not for the first time I applaud you with the article you have posted.For all you AKB, s you should note the objectiveness and argument of what JW has said and the rationale he uses to at least understand and consider other fans views, to which of course you are entitled.Me I honestly believe you are Deluded, Outdated and WRONG.Wenger would have had respect if he had gone when he KNEW it was all coming apart.This is not recent this is 7 - 8 seasons ago.But I do sympathise how difficult it must be dragging yourself through these tough tough times on # 9miilion f *** ing a year.All you AKB, s really do need to wake up to the reality of the position we are in and who is responsible for us being there.Who are you going to worship when he finally goes or are you going with him.Pathetic to even try to respond to opinion that is proved by where we are as a club.JW — WE SALUTE YOU

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.