there is only one Christian group that refuses to participate in war or
other atrocities against other humans.
Not exact matches
Priyath there are horrible
atrocities committed in the name of religion for centuries but they go
against the very meaning of religion and compassion for
others.
Also, while he is no doubt right to set himself
against «entertainment worship» and
other atrocities of the church - growth phenomenon, his suspicion of anything popular poses problems for evangelization and does not jibe with the enduring popularity through the centuries of the very liturgy that he champions.
Yam ATheists are good for the sake of being good, CHristians are only good because they'll burn in hell otherwise, but if allowed to, they would carry out
atrocities against others.
Instead of behaving in a professional manner, our military invaded Iraq with far too small a force; failed to respond adequately when parts of the Iraqi Army (and Baathist Party) went underground; tolerated an orgy of looting and lawlessness throughout the country; disobeyed orders and ignored international obligations (including the obligation of an occupying power to protect the facilities and treasures of the occupied country — especially, in this case, Baghdad's National Museum and
other archaeological sites of untold historic value); and incompetently fanned the flames of an insurgency
against our occupation, committing numerous
atrocities against unarmed Iraqi civilians.
Other Christians did not protest sufficiently
against these
atrocities.
They often engage in denial that their local collaborationist units participated in Holocaust and
other atrocities (it was all done by the Germans, you know, but we only fought for freedom
against Stalinism) and / or claim it was a mistake, excess, exaggerated (by the Soviets), or because of the general cruelty of the war.
To single out the Jews, diminishes the
atrocities committed
against other groups.
«Any such commission of inquiry should be given the mandate to establish the facts and circumstances surrounding the slave auction and
other atrocities being perpetrated in Libya
against Nigerians and
other African women, men and children, and to collect and preserve evidence as well as clarify responsibility, including the potential complicity of any governments and non-state actors.»
What are the scientific and social ramifications of working with human remains from crimes
against humanity, genocide, or
other mass
atrocities?
[8, 9] In many post-atrocity nations, as Rosenblatt states, religious leaders citing various beliefs have objected «to exhumation, autopsy, and
other forensic practices, even when the mass graves in question contained crucial evidence of
atrocities committed
against their own members.»
So my question is why and how do we expect to defend a faith with
others when we don't speak
against these
atrocities and protect those who are in suffering in the name of our faith?
Empire of the Summer Moon by S. C. Gwynne details the Comanche tribe violence and the violence committed
against them and captures the clashing of two different cultures and how both side committed horrible
atrocities against each
other in an attempt to obliterate the tribe and its life style.
You mean like «there was no Gulf of Tonkin incident» or «the Lusatania was carrying Arms & Ammunition» or «critical information was witheld from the commanders at Pearl Harbor» or «19 men armed with box - cutters hijacked 4 airplanes on 9/11/2001» or «the woman attesting to Iraqi
atrocities against Kuwait was the daughter of a Kuwati diplomat» or «some Germans tried to assassinate Hitler in 1944» or «insider climate scientists communicated with each
other to help obstruct the publication of papers skeptical of CAGW»