In most of the denominations there is still a considerable number of
biblical literalists (self - styled conservatives but called fundamentalists by
others) who refuse to accept the views of modern historical and textual scholarship as to the true meanings of the Bible.
It should be clear, however, that the
biblical literalist can find no comfort in these affirmations, for they rest on grounds quite
other than those of fundamentalism.
A problem could arise with
biblical literalists, but one could address that by suggesting that some fictional stories have great value in teaching some lesson or illuminating some aspect of the «human (or
other sentient being) condition», and also address actual historical events in the translation of the bible — or one could be more abbrassive and ask «do you believe deaf people can't be saved» (see one of Paul's letters, and the history of the Catholic Church)-- oh, you don't — so when you said you were a
literalist, you were speaking figuratively?»