Not exact matches
f The more original
Biblical reference to retaliation was from the mythical character Jesus (invented by Constantine at the first council at Nicaea in 325, and modeled after his own «
prophet» the Sun God, Mithra, and named Jesus Christos to combine the Celtic God Hesus and the Indian God Krishna, whose Latin name was Christos, into one God) who said «turn your
other cheek» (when struck in the face).
And to say that
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are
other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of
other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later
prophets like say Moses and
other later Old and New Testament
prophets and apostles.
Together with the opening line of the Letter to the Hebrews («In ancient times God spoke to man through
prophets and in varied ways, but now he speaks through Christ, His Son...»), as well as many
other biblical texts, this passage reveals to us a startling truth.
Hermann Gunkel, in a sense the unique father of us all in modern
biblical scholarship, despite his insistence on saga's supervision of the Elijah narratives as we receive them, nevertheless affirms on the one hand Elijah's kinship with the greatest of all ministers of ancient Israel, Moses, in their mutual contention with their own people; and, on the
other hand, Elijah's legitimate and immediate relationship to the great
prophets who follow him and who, essentially, continue the work he began.
with the exception of some small bits out of the books of the
prophets — virtually none of the
other biblical scribblings were contemporaneous with events described within them, and ALL of the texts were subject to revision for a really long time from people who came along after they were originally written.
Religious proponents of international law could draw on the
prophets for
biblical support: Amos, Hosea, Micah and
others discerned Yahweh's law as both impartial and international, striking against the arrogant pretensions of all people and nations who violate human rights in the belief that God is on their side.
The
biblical tradition itself constantly points beyond itself: Israel's
prophets acknowledging God's revealing activity in the lives of
other nations; Paul declaring himself to be debtor to both Jews and Greeks.
Yet the
biblical story repeatedly tells of the nation's turn away from God's rule to
other gods or to the misguided political judgments of the kings and rulers who did not heed God's true
prophets.