Sentences with phrase «other birth outcomes»

An impact analysis to measure what difference home visiting programs make in maternal prenatal health, health care use, preterm births and other birth outcomes, and infant health and health care use.

Studies suggest an association between prenatal anemia and risk of premature (preterm) birth, but evidence on other birth outcomes is inconsistent.

Not exact matches

Without knowing other specifics of the birth, it would be unjust and presumptious to say or imply that a trained midwife or a hospital birth would have made any difference to the outcome.

On the other hand, even a small percentage of misclassified outcomes in the home birth category have a dramatic impact.

The hospital birth was «good, but not great» and the other couple feel that a good outcome at hospital the first time around guarantees that the mother and baby will be fine second time around, so they now have an attitude of «why bother» going to the hospital.

Helping adolescent males to delay fatherhood may also be important from a child health perspective: research that controlled for maternal age and other key factors found teenage fatherhood associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight and neonatal death (Chen et al, 2007).

Dr. Fisher believes that dispassionate, rigorous study of birth across all settings is more important than ever given disparities in women's access to trained and licensed care providers, current and future physician workforce issues, rising costs of health care, and unacceptably high rates of adverse outcomes for mothers and infants in the U.S. compared to other industrialized countries.

The workshop featured presentations from invited speakers and discussions to highlight research findings that advance our understanding of the effects of maternal care services in different types of institutional settings on maternal labor, clinical and other birth procedures, and birth outcomes.

Unplanned home births are likely emergencies involving precipitous labor or other complications that might result in poorer - than - average outcomes when occurring in a setting unprepared for this type of delivery.

N: It can be challenging to help others grasp a bigger picture of adoption outcomes; children who are adopted may have different perspectives and feelings than their birth and / or adoptive families.

For healthy nulliparous women with a low risk pregnancy, the risk of an adverse perinatal outcome seems to be higher for planned births at home, and the intrapartum transfer rate is high in all settings other than an obstetric unit

Parents experiencing unplanned - for surgical birth (nearly 30 % of Ventura County mothers have surgical births, many unplanned), or other unexpected outcomes encounter more challenges, which can be addressed with persistence and professional and peer support till babe is thriving on mamas breast.

There were no significant differences in outcome of home or hospital births attended by midwives for the other child health measures.

«The CDC report and other research shows that babies born to women cared for by Certified Professional Midwives are far less likely to be preterm or low birth weight, two of the primary contributing factors not only to infant mortality, but to racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes.»

Most studies of homebirth in other countries have found no statistically significant differences in perinatal outcomes between home and hospital births for women at low risk of complications.36, 37,39 However, a recent study in the United States showed poorer neonatal outcomes for births occurring at home or in birth centres.40 A meta - analysis in the same year demonstrated higher perinatal mortality associated with homebirth41 but has been strongly criticised on methodological grounds.5, 42 The Birthplace in England study, 43 the largest prospective cohort study on place of birth for women at low risk of complications, analysed a composite outcome, which included stillbirth and early neonatal death among other serious morbidity.

Don't forget about the 2005 study that compared outcomes of CPM attended births and hospital births, where the results showed similar IP and neonatal death rates for both, but CPM attended births fared better in other categories.

The goal of the Birth by the Numbers website is to present accurate, up - to - date information on childbirth practices and outcomes in the United States and other countries.

Studies have shown that trying to use ultrasounds or other imaging to guesstimate whether the baby (or babies) will fit through mom's pelvis doesn't help the birth outcome.

We restricted the denominator to live births for all other outcomes, since only live - born neonates were at risk for those outcomes (e.g., neonatal death).

For example, the fact that 27 transfer patients are listed as having a physician as their planned birth attendant is most likely due to errors in birth - certificate completion; data are currently lacking to inform the degree of misclassification related to this and others factors that affect the study outcomes.

Our hypothesis was that women with an elevated fear of birth would emerge as a distinct profile that had poorer pregnancy and birth outcomes than other women.

For all low risk women, bootstrapped estimates showed that planned birth in settings other than an obstetric unit was associated with cost savings and considerable stochastic uncertainty surrounding adverse perinatal outcomes.

The authors suggest that autonomy in the context of choosing place of birth is defined by three main attributes: information, capacity and freedom; given the antecedent of not harming others, and the consequences of accountability for the outcome.

The paucity of evidence for the longer term consequences of adverse events and other health outcomes after birth for both mother and baby remains and further research to generate combined QALY estimates for the linked mother - baby dyad should be a priority for research in this specialty.

A new article published in Clinical Lactation addresses potential negative outcomes of epidurals and other birth interventions.

A woman choosing place of birth is autonomous if she receives all relevant information on available choices, risks and benefits, is capable of understanding and processing the information and choosing place of birth in the absence of coercion, provided she intends no harm to others and is accountable for the outcome.

For the purposes of this economic evaluation, the forms were initially used in a related study funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) research for patient benefit programme «assessing the impact of a new birth centre on choice and outcome of maternity care in an inner city area,» which will be reported in full elsewhere, comparing the costs of care in a free standing midwifery unit with care in an obstetric unit in the same trust.16 The data collected included details of staffing levels, treatments, surgeries, diagnostic imaging tests, scans, drugs, and other resource inputs associated with each stage of the pathway through intrapartum and after birth care.

Since the early 1990s, government policy on maternity care in England has moved towards policies designed to give women with straightforward pregnancies a choice of settings for birth.1 2 In this context, freestanding midwifery units, midwifery units located in the same building or on the same site as an obstetric unit (hereafter referred to as alongside midwifery units), and home birth services have increasingly become relevant to the configuration of maternity services under consideration in England.3 The relative benefits and risks of birth in these alternative settings have been widely debated in recent years.4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Lower rates of obstetric interventions and other positive maternal outcomes have been consistently found in planned births at home and in midwifery units, but clear conclusions regarding perinatal outcome have been lacking.

Adverse neonatal outcomes including death were determined by place of birth and attendant type for in - hospital CNM, in - hospital «other» midwife, home certified nurse midwife, home «other» midwife, and free - standing birth center CNM deliveries.

Two articles will be published in the upcoming Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health: one describes the MANA Stats system and how it works, and the other describes the outcomes of planned home births with midwives between 2004 and 2009.

Assumed differences between caseload or team models of care versus other models of care could not explain the heterogeneity for these outcomes, and neither could potential differences between low - risk and mixed - risk groups of pregnant women (See analyses for regional analgesia Analysis 2.1 and Analysis 3.1 and for preterm birth Analysis 2.6 and Analysis 3.6).

The SMMIS database is extremely useful for the study of pregnancy outcomes by place of birth, because it overcomes many of the problems inherent within other data sources.

This is understandable; if planned home birth is associated with a greatly elevated risk of serious negative infant outcomes, then most women and clinicians would be reluctant to attach as much importance to other benefits it might offer.

Measures ofmaternal satisfaction were reported in one study of 15 women, but there were insufficient data to draw any conclusions; no other secondary outcomes were reported for women with multiple births in either study.

lion of zion, for the specific population of healthy normal woman with healthy normal pregnancies, they have found that home births actually have better outcomes for both baby and mother — i.e. better apgars, better weight gain after the birth, and other indicators of maternal and baby wellbeing.

By facilitating their involvement in parenting programs, these families will have the opportunity to change some of their parenting behaviours and beliefs, which may ultimately buffer children who are at risk of poor developmental outcomes because of genetic vulnerability, low birth weight, low socio - economic status, or cumulative environmental risks, among others.

Dr Tuteur's point was that women of African descent are at higher risk of obstetric problems compared to other ethnic groups, that 1 in 6 women giving birth in the US is of African descent, and that this may explain disparity of outcome to some extent.

Those who have actually read the Cheyney study can see that the authors compared their outcomes to many other studies on planned home birth and found no differences in intrapartum and neonatal death rates.

If you were truly interested in outcomes that may be attributed to place of birth, then you would want to compare cohorts that are as similar as possible in other ways.

We readily gather statistics and share our birth outcomes with other birth professionals and to help establish home birth midwifery in our western culture.

Regardless of outcomes, interventions used, or paths taken, will a woman who feels in control of her birth choices go on to take more control of other areas of her life than a women who choices a passive role?

This may be different in other countries, but it is not unexpected in the Netherlands, where home birth has been an approved option for a long time.1 5 12 After background variables were controlled for, the perinatal outcome for primiparous women with low risk pregnancies was similar for those who planned home births and those who planned hospital births.

In addition to birthweight, other perinatal outcomes examined in previous studies include the timing and quantity of prenatal care, health - care costs at and around birth, and infant and neonatal mortality.

Comparison 2 Midwife - led versus other models of care: variation in midwifery models of care (caseload / one - to - one or team), Outcome 3 Instrumental vaginal birth (forceps / vacuum).

Other investigators have reported a significant increase in adverse perinatal outcomes related to planned home births, especially where skilled birth attendants are not universally integrated into regional health systems, or in population - based studies that include at - risk pregnancies [20 — 22].

Comparison 2 Midwife - led versus other models of care: variation in midwifery models of care (caseload / one - to - one or team), Outcome 2 Caesarean birth.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 15 Attendance at birth by known midwife.

Other professional organisations have issued statements questioning the evidence basis for support of women's choice of birth place, and stating that hospital birth is the only setting that assures safe outcomes [27, 28].

Comparison 2 Midwife - led versus other models of care: variation in midwifery models of care (caseload / one - to - one or team), Outcome 6 Preterm birth (< 37 weeks).

Comparison 3 Midwife - led versus other models of care: variation in risk status (low versus mixed), Outcome 3 Instrumental vaginal birth (forceps / vacuum).