As an account owner, you can also convert paper savings bonds purchased as gifts for someone else, or bonds you have obtained through inheritance or
other change in ownership.
In the unlikely event that Brain Balance Centers is involved in a merger, acquisition, sale or
other change in ownership, our customers» information may be among the transferred business assets.
Not exact matches
We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including volatility
in the economy and the credit markets, supply and demand
changes for vacation
ownership and residential products, competitive conditions; the availability of capital to finance growth, and
other matters referred to under the heading «Risk Factors» contained
in our Annual Report on 10 - K for the year ended December 30, 2011 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the «SEC») and
in subsequent SEC filings, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in or implied
in this presentation.
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating
in a highly competitive industry;
changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret
changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth
in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or
other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility
in commodity, energy and
other input costs;
changes in the Company's management team or
other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives;
changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law
changes or interpretations; legal claims or
other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions
in the United States and
in various
other nations
in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility
in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events
in the locations
in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's
ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock
in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend;
changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and
other factors.
Given that spreading
ownership of capital and increasing employees» share
in economic rewards has bipartisan appeal, 37 the only valid answer to the question by Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, or
other time travelers is that, after four decades of neglecting policies to stimulate broad - based profit sharing and employee share
ownership, we have
changed course and are now placing them
in the policy portfolio, if not at the center of economic policymaking that they occupied from the days of Washington to Lincoln.
In the event that it is determined that we have in the past experienced an ownership change, or if we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of this offering or future transactions in our stock, then we may be limited in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we ear
In the event that it is determined that we have
in the past experienced an ownership change, or if we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of this offering or future transactions in our stock, then we may be limited in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we ear
in the past experienced an
ownership change, or if we experience one or more
ownership changes as a result of this offering or future transactions
in our stock, then we may be limited in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we ear
in our stock, then we may be limited
in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we ear
in our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and
other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we earn.
In the George W. Bush administration, changes in accounting regulations and Federal policies made granting of broad - based stock options and restricted and other stock grants to employees in high technology and other companies less attractive, which led to a huge drop in employee share ownership among the middle class in those companies and industrie
In the George W. Bush administration,
changes in accounting regulations and Federal policies made granting of broad - based stock options and restricted and other stock grants to employees in high technology and other companies less attractive, which led to a huge drop in employee share ownership among the middle class in those companies and industrie
in accounting regulations and Federal policies made granting of broad - based stock options and restricted and
other stock grants to employees
in high technology and other companies less attractive, which led to a huge drop in employee share ownership among the middle class in those companies and industrie
in high technology and
other companies less attractive, which led to a huge drop
in employee share ownership among the middle class in those companies and industrie
in employee share
ownership among the middle class
in those companies and industrie
in those companies and industries.
We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including volatility
in the economy and the credit markets, supply and demand
changes for vacation
ownership and residential products, competitive conditions; the availability of capital to finance growth, and
other matters referred to under the heading «Risk Factors» contained
in the Information Statement filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended December 30, 2011 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the «SEC») and
in subsequent SEC filings, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in or implied
in this presentation.
The company cautions you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including volatility
in the economy and the credit markets, supply and demand
changes for vacation
ownership and residential products, competitive conditions; the availability of capital to finance growth, and
other matters referred to under the heading «Risk Factors» contained
in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K filed with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (the «SEC») and
in subsequent SEC filings, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in or implied
in this press release.
Other specific duties and responsibilities of the HR and Compensation Committee include reviewing senior management selection and overseeing succession planning, including reviewing the leadership development process; reviewing and approving objectives relevant to executive officer compensation and evaluating performance and determining the compensation of executive officers in accordance with those objectives; approving severance arrangements and other applicable agreements for executive officers; overseeing HP's equity and incentive compensation plans; overseeing non-equity-based benefit plans and approving any changes to such plans involving a material financial commitment by HP; monitoring workforce management programs; establishing compensation policies and practices for service on the Board and its committees, including annually reviewing the appropriate level of director compensation and recommending to the Board any changes to that compensation; developing stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers and monitoring compliance with such guidelines; and annually evaluating its performance and its cha
Other specific duties and responsibilities of the HR and Compensation Committee include reviewing senior management selection and overseeing succession planning, including reviewing the leadership development process; reviewing and approving objectives relevant to executive officer compensation and evaluating performance and determining the compensation of executive officers
in accordance with those objectives; approving severance arrangements and
other applicable agreements for executive officers; overseeing HP's equity and incentive compensation plans; overseeing non-equity-based benefit plans and approving any changes to such plans involving a material financial commitment by HP; monitoring workforce management programs; establishing compensation policies and practices for service on the Board and its committees, including annually reviewing the appropriate level of director compensation and recommending to the Board any changes to that compensation; developing stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers and monitoring compliance with such guidelines; and annually evaluating its performance and its cha
other applicable agreements for executive officers; overseeing HP's equity and incentive compensation plans; overseeing non-equity-based benefit plans and approving any
changes to such plans involving a material financial commitment by HP; monitoring workforce management programs; establishing compensation policies and practices for service on the Board and its committees, including annually reviewing the appropriate level of director compensation and recommending to the Board any
changes to that compensation; developing stock
ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers and monitoring compliance with such guidelines; and annually evaluating its performance and its charter.
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current
ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase
in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply
changing the formation or bringing
in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental
change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of
others to secure our place
in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed
in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
(Carnegie Learning spun out as an independent company
in 1998, and its
ownership has
changed hands several times between private equity groups and
other investors.)
Knowing when to get your oil
changed, how to check your tire pressure, or even why you should pay attention to your gauge cluster are all important, along with countless
other ins and outs to car
ownership and longevity.
But over the years many of the kibbutzim have modified themselves to include home
ownership, offering rental property to outsiders and ways to reach the larger community with the fruits of their labors,
in other words they
changed when they needed to.
If SOX compliance or some
other factor was causing companies to delay IPO, float
in another country or go private (or a different factor like «free» dotcom money drove up public
ownership), that would
change the size of the signal that TMC: GNP was sending.
From a fiscal standpoint, this transaction is deemed to have
changed ownership —
in other words, it is considered a disposition.
The IRS could challenge our calculation of the amount of our NOLs or our determinations as to when a prior
change in ownership occurred and
other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to carry forward our NOLs to offset taxable income
in future years.
And through conversations with
others in the growing climate justice movement, I began to see all kinds of ways that climate
change could become a catalyzing force for positive
change — how it could be the best argument progressives have ever had to demand the rebuilding and reviving of local economies; to reclaim our democracies from corrosive corporate influence; to block harmful new free trade deals and rewrite old ones; to invest
in starving public infrastructure like mass transit and affordable housing; to take back
ownership of essential services like energy and water; to remake our sick agricultural system into something much healthier; to open borders to migrants whose displacement is linked to climate impacts; to finally respect Indigenous land rights — all of which would help to end grotesque levels of inequality within our nations and between them.
However, I am not opposed to considering lesser
changes such as: (1) relaxing some of the fee - sharing restrictions currently imposed on multi-disciplinary partnerships, (2) permitting law firms to use
other types of corporations besides professional corporations, or (3) permitting long - time employees of a law firm to have a small
ownership interest
in a law firm, at least while they are employed by that firm.
In other words, the most significant change came with the use of force whether directly or indirectly: weapons, famine, starvation, killings, genocide, and, the transfer of ownership of property (gold, land, slaves, tobacco, sugar, coffee, etc.) with contractual consideration given in the form of a Bible, various baubles, and an annual per capita grant not indexed to CP
In other words, the most significant
change came with the use of force whether directly or indirectly: weapons, famine, starvation, killings, genocide, and, the transfer of
ownership of property (gold, land, slaves, tobacco, sugar, coffee, etc.) with contractual consideration given
in the form of a Bible, various baubles, and an annual per capita grant not indexed to CP
in the form of a Bible, various baubles, and an annual per capita grant not indexed to CPI.
The social attitudes towards issues like labour supply, gender, wealth, property
ownership, death, indigenous rights and so many
others have
changed substantially during the development of the common law and,
in many cases,
in the last 50 or 100 years.
However, setting up these plans so far
in advance comes with it's own downsides, as a lot can
change in the interim (like the funeral home
changing ownership) and you won't have that premium money to use for
other purposes (investment, for instance, which will net you a much greater return and can be used for funeral payments once you actually pass).
While many attended the vigils to mourn or offer words of encouragement,
others took a political approach, calling for a
change in legislation concerning gun
ownership and acquisition.
A thorough research and consultation process, including full information about what a proposal entails (including losses or detriment as well as benefits)
in a form that is understood by traditional owner groups, and the right to say no, is necessary to comply with the principle of free, prior and informed consent as well as to understand whether
changes will support intended outcomes.31 How
changing title from communal to individual
ownership through leasing will address
other identified impediments to economic development such as inadequate infrastructure
in remote areas, under - investment
in education and healthcare, high levels of welfare dependency, high levels of un-employment and limited job opportunities and limited commercial opportunities is unclear.
The
change in ownership from the U.S. Postal Service to the developer is expected to be transparent to postal customers, as the retail lobby and
other services will be retained
in the building.
A closer examination of the history of property rights shows that laws were
changed so that whites could improve their lot
in life through property
ownership; not so for African Americans, Indians, and
other people of color.
In some areas, the assessor's valuations are only updated every three to five years, in other areas only when the property changes ownershi
In some areas, the assessor's valuations are only updated every three to five years,
in other areas only when the property changes ownershi
in other areas only when the property
changes ownership.