Sentences with phrase «other changes seem»

Other then that I am fine with this the other changes seem good especially that song of double time idea which will be great for side quests in my opinion.

Although some physiological brain changes are similar in new moms and dads, other changes seem different and could relate to the roles of each parent, says senior author James Swain, a psychiatrist at the University of Michigan (brain diagrams below).

Not exact matches

At that time, Dimon had noted that Trump seemed willing to listen to other opinions and change his mind.

For some users, the departure of Taylor seemed to sum up a lot of these changes: Poor communication from the site's management, a move that seemed to indicate a lack of respect for the work that moderators and other users do, and suggestions that her firing might have been triggered by her refusal to do certain things that would make the Ask Me Anything feature more commercial.

«We have no specific indication or information that Ottawa is seriously considering such a change... other than to note that [the Department of Finance] is casting about for revenues, they are taking a long look at all so - called tax expenditures, and this government seems to have few qualms about taxing the «rich».»

On the other hand, I think the most interesting point will be to see if and how the Topdanmark stock price will react to a change to a dividend stock next week, which seems to be quite likely.

Some objects seem to change rapidly, others not at all.

«churches like that», being predicated upon the fraudulent activity as they seem to be, could be «banned» but that would not really change much of anything... other than repackaging the criminal activity under a loosely - defined label... meh.

So feel free to toss aside this piece of evidence if you want... but it doesn't change the other 99 % that you seem to avoid like the plague.

As for the other canidates, it seems Newt changes his religion as often as he changes wives..

Money problems seem to be the first concern of seminary students followed by the gap between church and seminary, the lack of time in seminary to learn all that is needed to know, the shortage of «practical» learning, the need for seminary to change with the times and other items are discussed by seminary students.

I don't mean to sound jealous or envirous you certainly don't get rich counting the other guys change is an old Russian proverb my grandfather taught my father, but it seems the repubs just obsess and thrive over the lucky and the insanely fortunate, and it's epidemic all around me.

Changing meeting times — which seems to happen hourly here — is a breeze when you can count on others to be monitoring their computers.

Our religions are so different that it seems the only way to keep the peace is to admit the other folks may also be right and back away from our efforts to change their religions or governments.

When crotchety old grammarians complain about the debasement of language, often they are merely deploring change per se; other times they wax wroth over what seem to most of us relatively insignificant losses in precision, clarity, or beauty.

Like many others, Mead seems to assume that the changes that make a difference in American Christianity will happen among evangelicals, not among the aging Protestant mainstream or the scandal - plagued Roman Catholics.

And that means, or so it seems to me, that psychological intuitions and, perhaps, even explicitly psychological models and terminology can give us insight into what these changes are in ourselves and others.

It seems to be saying that, while not changing as a percentage of crime, «rates are lower today for blacks, as they also are for other race groupings.»

It seems that where Man is concerned the specific function of education is to ensure the continued development of this personality by transmitting it to the endlessly changing mass: in other words, to extend and ensure in collective mankind a consciousness which may already have reached its limit in the individual.

But other than that, the vast majority of humanity believes in a higher power, so it seems to me the burden of proof would be on the side that is the VAST minority... but once again, the side that is asking the other to change their mind have to prove their point within reason.

Though the implications of population change are profound — no less so because it involves the generation and termination of human life — it is a form of change that seems slow by comparison with many others.

As reason sets human beings apart from all other animals, it seems that our rational nature can not be explained by evolution alone, for we do not find stages of lesser reflective selfconsciousness before the human species but evolution requires only gradual changes at a time.

But at the same time, this cartoon seems to imply that at some point after I've «lived» enough the tides change and it's totally ok to label each other as sinners.

Reacting to the judgement, Dr Saunders said: «Conway has a terminal condition but that didn't seem to deter the judges in any way... it was pretty clear that they had put a huge amount of weight on the medical evidence and the evidence from disabled people about how any change couldn't be controlled and they'd also looked at what had happened in other jurisdictions».

Anyway, despite all the confusion about pre-millenialism, a-millenialism, post-millenialism, the recent invention of the rapture, Paul's confusing statement about «we who remain», the entire book of Revelation not appearing to be written by John because of the Greek used, and the odd way in which eschatological views seem to change in the New Testament Pauline letters, and the bizarrely easy way people like Thessalonians became convinced Christ had already returned in their time, and all the other confusing things about New Testament prophecy — the truth is that it is all trustworthy and you should not question this.

Others had God on speed - dial while God's number always seemed to be changing for me.

Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz

But things have changed dramatically in the past decade... perhaps because so many of my fellow ministers went through the same situation... so there is hope yet for other issues... It seems the way of the majority usually wins over time...

Or the question seems to be merely theoretical and immediately changes into a question of our freedom, whether we shall also challenge one an - other in future by saying «God», be it affirming, denying or doubting him.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

In a thought that seems especially appropriate to media audiences, Lifton states: «I became convinced that anxious immersion in death imagery is important for psychotherapy or any other important Personal change.

What was striking to the outside observer in these events was that the inevitable interdisciplinary conversations dealt primarily with the transformations of traditional patterns of life — transformations that seem to some so glacially slow that everything should be done to speed them up, and to others so incredibly rapid that people and morality were getting lost in the swirl of change.

More Than Faithful Presence Charles Colson Hunter and I Agree on Culture Making (He Just Doesn't Seem To Know It) Andy Crouch Faithful Presence Is Not Quietism James Davison Hunter Two other resources are worth considering: Ken Myers interview with James Davison Hunter Mars Hill Audio (Volume 101)» How Not to Change the World» Andy Crouch Books & Culture (May / June 2010)

When they prayed, the faces of some «drain [ed] of all color and seem [ed] enraptured, some swoon [ed], while others dance [d], change [d] their voice, or [shook] their heads.»

Present - day society is locked into four positive feedback loops which need to be broken: economic growth which feeds on itself, population growth which feeds on itself, technological change which feeds on itself, and a pattern of income inequality which seems to be self - sustaining and which tends to spur growth in the other three areas.

But then it speaks explicitly of ditching the form (or essence) approach of Aquinas and Aristotle and gives the example of «horseness» as something that can change — without seeming to realise that this leads logically to ditching the notion of «human being» and, as a consequence, our union with other humans, from Adam and Eve down the ages until the end of time.

I didn't change a single thing about the recipe other than cutting 12 slabs instead of 8 which I do recommend and omitting the oil from the dressing which didn't seem to affect it whatsoever.

He educated me on my underlying issues (leaky gut and candidasis) which were the reasons why I was having other health issues that would change often enough to make my health seem confusing.

The kids like them, as they seem to enjoy any sort of bean / legume, and they've been a nice change of pace from the other beans we eat more frequently.

using sweet rice flour seems interesting but I have not tried it yet, not sure what other changes would be needed.

However every recipe I've used seems to require soaking the almonds at least 4 hours, others saying 8 to 12... does not doing this change the consistency at all?

(3) formation flexibility — it took 20 years for Wenger to return to a back 3 and now he can't seem to choose anything but that formation... the teams in the premiership and those we could face in the Europa will present vastly different tactics and we need to have a manager who can prepare this squad for this eventuality and have the fortitude to make the necessary adjustments throughout the season... I have seen nothing in the past 6 - 7 years to suggest that he is the man to take on this challenge... I can't even remember when he changed formations when he would replace a small, pacy striker, like during the Walcott experiment, with the lumbering Giroud... of course this is exactly why there is no other manager in the world that plays more players out of their natural positions (square peg in a round hole)

I'm not getting carried away, but I always thought we had a good enough team to win the league, but there was clearly a major disagreement in the team after Christmas, as nobody was even looking each other in the face, on the field or on the bench, but things seem to have improved now, along with the formation change.

«I don't know if Arsene Wenger doesn't like change and doesn't like bringing in other players that he doesn't know but it seems to be he's more comfortable with the players he knows.

Also, the new formation of a back three does seem suited to Chambers, just like it is with the other young England international Rob Holding, who does seem to have the edge over Chambers in Wenger's plans but that could change and any injury could mean that Chambers is needed.

It's a shame really how people are so plastic over here.We seem to change our views so easily.Why can't people just make up their minds?It's like people don't have stance.As I've been saying and will keep saying we have many good players but as good as they are they're overrated.We've just compromised as a club.There are problems in every single role in the team, from defence to attack.Yet these problems will constantly be ignored.Some players are cleary not good enough but say it and the stats lovers will come out.The main problem wrong with the team is the centre.The other problem is Wenger and his misuse of players.I for one don't really rate Ramsey - Xhaka partnership in a sense that it's defensively weak with Xhaka not good enough defensively and Ramsey very inconsistent.The only player excellent defensively in the centre in Arsenal's team is Coquelin and I think he should be playing though many won'tsee why.Look how easily the balls went through the midfield.Coquelin should be partnered with another CM in our current team.People shouldn't deceive themselves Xhaka that Xhaka isn't a DM.He's just not good defensively admit it.We need a DM more than a CM in my opinion or a hybrid like Sanches or Jankto.

Come on mate everyone knows our club has gone threw a transactional period that we will probably never see in our life time again football has changed since the billionaires have come in we had to make the changes no other manager could of kept us in the top four while we had to change our whole structure I'm not saying wenger is perfect he does fustrate us all sometimes but were in safe hands and were going in the right direction not that I know a lot about the ffp but something is happening and every year we seem to becoming in a stronger position to what wenger is trying to achieve for our club we all know this is wenger last contract and even if he win the cl or the epl he won't sign another contract it just fustrates me that the way people act sometimes our time is coming even wen wenger leaves we will still have hope that we can compete for honours lets just enjoy beign arsenal fans and what will be will be cause wen in a very stable position and that is all the hope I need that our time will come in the future COYG

If the Sounders spend even $ 3 million on a DP this summer (which seems very likely), that will put them into the top three spending teams on player wages (assuming no other significant changes, which is a tough assumption).

Of course there is also the small matter of Arsene Wenger's contract to be resolved, but if Le Prof does re-sign for another two years he will have to make massive changes to the squad one way or the other, and this would seem to go against his usual philosophy of continuity, stability and cohesion, which has seen him keeping his team together and extending contracts of players that have come through the Arsenal youth system.

Many Chelsea players have gone out on loan in the past and never returned, but there seems to be a slight change of stance under Conte, who has found a place for Christensen this season and for Victor Moses last term, even if other youngsters such as Nathaniel Chalobah and Nathan Ake were sold a little prematurely.