The groups that compose conservative Christendom are marked by distinctive theological stances and sociological dynamics as significant as those that distinguish
other church traditions or those that separate evangelical groups from mainline denominations.
Later as I studied the Bible more deeply and became aware of many
other church traditions, doctrines, and denominations, my Baptist convictions grew stronger.
I wandered through
other church traditions, traditional, contemporary, liturgical, meditative, mystic, seeker - sensitive, emerging, ancient - future, denominational, mega-church, old church, new church, basement church, no church for a while there: you name it, I found my way there and I found the people of God in each place, I did.
Not exact matches
Maybe you could bring in Christians from another
church tradition or from the
other side of the world to come and find fault with how your
church is accomplishing (or not accomplishing) your mission.
Any
other practice breaks the unity of the
church, and the lack of water baptism is actually a
tradition of omission, thus not showing a greater understanding of faith, but rather a lack of reverence for the will and intention of Jesus himself.
Alexander III, following the ancient
tradition of the
Church declared that «After a lawfully accorded consent affecting the present, it is allowed to one of the parties, even against the will of the
other, to choose a monastery (just as certain saints have been called from marriage), provided that carnal intercourse shall not have taken place between them; and it is allowed to the one who is left to proceed to a second marriage» (III Decretal., xxxii, 2).
Should we say, as some inclusivists do, that it is because of Christ's saving mystery, offered to all, that salvation is available to the Hindu, for example, in the sincere practice of his or her faith — that in Christ salvation is mediated to Christians through the
church and to non-Christians through
other traditions of faith?
the reminder that Orthodox theology continually refreshes its thinking by reference to the early
Church Fathers, who were much concerned with the question of God's activity in the
other sects and
traditions and in the wisdom of humankind.
What is needed, however, so as to reassure the Eastern Orthodox is some mechanism whereby a pope who departs from
Tradition by teaching error, or what may be construed as error, can be inhibited by a form of ecclesiastical enquiry or trial — as is the case with any
other bishop in the
Church.
At the most recent General Assembly of the World Council of
Churches, in Vancouver in 1983, the theological significance of
other religious
traditions still remained a controversial issue.
Questions also are raised about the identity of the
church that plays such a major role in the Radical Orthodox account of history, about whether there is a doctrine of providence implicit in it, about the dismissal or ignoring of Protestantism, about the role of Jesus in its Christianity, about the role of Socrates in its Platonism, about its failure to engage with the challenge of modern scientific and technological developments, about how
other faith
traditions are related to this version of faith, and about whether this is a habitable orthodoxy for ordinary life.
Upon the basis of Paul's teaching, taken alone, Christianity might possibly have foundered a century later in the rising sea of Gnosticism; possessing Mark's compilation of the historic
traditions, later amplified by the
other evangelists, the
church held true to its course, steering with firm, unslackened grip upon the historic origins of its faith.
Second, if the
church is attentive to the New Testament, Justin Martyr and Hippolytus, the Eastern
church, the Western catholic
tradition, the Anglican
tradition, the Lutheran
tradition, the Calvinist intent (and practice, if not in Geneva then in places like John Robinson's Leiden), the Wesleyan intent and that of the early Methodists, then its worship on every festival of the resurrection — that is, on every Sunday — will include both Word and Supper, not one or the
other.
I write from the standpoint of a
Church of England parish priest and many of my examples are from that tradition, but I recognize that the Church of England is one church amongst many churches, just as Christianity is one religion amongst many world religions which are slowly learning to share with each other their spiritual treasures and to work together for peace, the relief of human need and the preservation of the p
Church of England parish priest and many of my examples are from that
tradition, but I recognize that the
Church of England is one church amongst many churches, just as Christianity is one religion amongst many world religions which are slowly learning to share with each other their spiritual treasures and to work together for peace, the relief of human need and the preservation of the p
Church of England is one
church amongst many churches, just as Christianity is one religion amongst many world religions which are slowly learning to share with each other their spiritual treasures and to work together for peace, the relief of human need and the preservation of the p
church amongst many
churches, just as Christianity is one religion amongst many world religions which are slowly learning to share with each
other their spiritual treasures and to work together for peace, the relief of human need and the preservation of the planet.
The pope's words are at the service of the whole
Tradition of the
Church, and not the
other way around.
Many
other saintly authorities could be quoted, but one hopes that this helps to reassure those who, in the current climate of tension, have been made nervous and perhaps over cautious about what truly belongs to the orthodox
tradition of the
Church.
In two brief narratives belonging to the later stratum of the
tradition, the
church has shown vividly how this decisive Either - Or dominates the preaching of Jesus, how every
other interest disappears before the exclusiveness of the demand of God.
What is chosen therefore is one of those types of act which «in the
Church's moral
tradition have been termed «intrinsically evil» (intrinsice malum): they are such always and per se, in
other words on account of their very object, and quite apart from the ulterior intentions of the one acting and the circumstances.»
After a few years of wilderness wandering (you should expect that, by the way — look for the manna; look for the water from rock), I found myself in the Episcopal
Church, which is no less riddled with conflict and shortcomings than any
other Christian
tradition, but which introduced me to the sacraments that have managed to sustain my ever - complicated, ever - faltering faith.
In
other chapters, Wuthnow examines further significant questions, such as who goes to
church or not, why different religious
traditions are gaining and losing members, faith and the Internet, recent trends in religious beliefs and spirituality, the role of families in faith formation, and generational differences when it comes to religion and public life.
Through these further human relations Christ leaves
other principles which will endure in the
Church: Petrine (Office and Sacraments), Pauline (missionary character and charisms), Johannine (unity, contemplative love and the evangelical counsels) and Jacobine (continuity of old and new covenant —
Tradition, Canon Law).
In
other traditions the practice of doing theology authoritatively is institutionalized in the powers of constitutionally legitimated representative denominational assemblies elected to govern the
church.
It provides a totally new perspective from which black people can view themselves,
others, Scripture,
church,
tradition and reason.
To warrant this radical revision — one might almost say reversal — of the Catholic
tradition, Father Concetti and
others explain that the
Church from biblical times until our own day has failed to perceive the true significance of the image of God in man, which implies that even the terrestrial life of each individual person is sacred and inviolable.
It means that the
church must, among
other things, be backward - looking; it has a special mission to preserve the past, to carry on a
tradition.
Some of the sayings which he relates are ascribed to oral
tradition by the
Church Fathers;
others are to be found in Gnostic sources which the Fathers quote.
The
church is also being regarded as an important community of memory because the
other sources of a rich narrative
tradition — families, ethnic groups, residential communities — are also subject to the growing pressures of change, while more recent institutions, such as business firms and the mass media, are believed to have only shallow ties to the past.
I believe that this document is valuable if we can start to read it as if it speaks to ourselves, our own
church, our own
tradition than if it were addressed to «
others».
[50] Christian theology of religions, on the
other hand, «studies the various
traditions in the context of the history of salvation and in their relationship to the mystery of Jesus Christ and the Christian
Church.»
Such a defense seems to come down to this: the local
church is preserved from suffocating provincialism when it intentionally engages in dialogue with
other churches and when it remains steadfast in appropriating and witnessing to the «apostolic
tradition.»
In the modern context the just war teachings of the Catholic
Church lie alongside the contributions of these
other spheres to the developing
tradition.
One of the wonderful things about the Episcopal
Church and
other mainline
traditions is their affirmation of reason and their willingness to see both sides of an argument and be open to ambiguity.
While students of ecclesiology will recognize in these perspectives an unflagging congregationalism, Volf is sensitive to areas in which the free
church tradition is especially vulnerable: the unity within the Christian communities; the bonds that connect one congregation to
others; the accountability of congregations and clergy; and the ever - present threat to neglect or abandon the apostolic
tradition.
«Openness to all
other churches is a formal identifying feature of catholicity, and to this feature we must add loyalty to the apostolic
tradition.»
They do not expect to be just like every
other church or to appeal to every person, and they do not expect that their
tradition will survive without effort.
In our earlier sections, we have noted that F.C. Burkitt, Arthur Voobus and several
other historians have shown that the emphasis on celibacy and abstinence from marriage belonged to an authentic
tradition of the Syrian
church till the fourth century.
At a meeting of the National Council of
Churches he asked, not for any legal restriction but a «a voluntary agreement among religious leaders of all faiths that from now on they would not resort to conversions because the social logic of conversions is not valid now», that the promise of liberation from caste structure has not been fulfilled as proved by the fact that it persists in all religious communities; and any attempt to organize Hinduism as a religious community like
others of the prophetic
tradition has been a failure.
You recognize it in every Christian scholar, university,
church, or society that subjects its own religious
tradition to critical standards that it would never apply to
others.
This vagueness doubtless is partly due to the conflict of
traditions — a conflict in which exponents of the primacy of the «secret call» may take the position that it alone is adequate while
others who emphasize the first importance of
church call come to the indefensible position of renouncing the importance of command and obedience enacted in solitariness.
But it is important to note that there is no
other rival
tradition in the
church with regard to its origin and there is no
other country in the world that claims that St. Thomas died there.
With it has come a new sense of the special significance — long obvious enough to
others, but to me unsuspected — of the Bible, the creeds, theological
tradition and the Christian
Church.
The wording of the presbyter's remark leaves open the question of Mark's use of
other sources than Peter, whose «interpreter» he was: sources, or
traditions, in circulation among the Christians in Rome no doubt from the first founding of the
church in that community, long before Paul's arrival and perhaps some time before Peter's coming; and also, no doubt,
traditions that were added to the common stock by every believer who came to Rome from Palestine.
The intellectual
tradition of the Sophists (alike criticized by the loyal Erasmus and the exiled Luther), along with
other elements of
church tradition, had drifted so far that it no longer convincingly centered on that which was revealed.
While Biblical hermeneutics provided the key to an understanding of the role of women in the
church and family, dialogue between those whose
traditions have heard the Word of God differently in
other times and places held the key for the discussion of social ethics, and engagement with the full range of cultural activity (from psychotherapy to radical protest, from personal testimony to scientific statement) was the locus for theological evaluation concerning homosexuality.
It would surely continue the
Church's grand
tradition of contempt for the erotic, a
tradition that ensures a guilty hangover in any Roman Catholic who dares to indulge in love - making for any reason
other than the primary one of reproduction.
The
tradition of lectio divina — a contemplative reading of scripture — was lost to the Protestant
Church, which preferred
other ways of reading the scriptures.
Jeremy i agree with what you have written many of the
traditions in the
church have come from pagan beliefs.I thought some of the comments were judgemental of
others especially towards those who are pagan.There response was respectful we can learn alot about having a good attitude towards
others and responding to
others kindly.I think using scripture in a legalistic way is no different than what the pharisees did to Jesus in his day and he disarmed them by rebuking them saying you without sin cast the first stone.regards brentnz
The
church building is probably more essential in the Orthodox than in any
other Christian
tradition.
First, a little history: In the 16th century Protestant and Catholic positions on justification became polarized and soon escalated to include
other doctrines, including the authority of the
church; scripture and
tradition; good works; merit and indulgences; the mass; and sin and its effects in human life.
Especially with questions like «what is
Church» and a myraid of
other issues... It seems that our back grounds form a lot of our
traditions and beliefs.