Sentences with phrase «other claims back»

It's an A8, apparently, which opens many other claims back to discussion.

Not exact matches

The Chamber of Minerals and Energy has fired back at union claims that the resources sector does nothing to train the state's workforce, but relies on migrants and poaching workers from other industri

In other words, don't make claims you can't back up.

Reviewers go back and forth about the assembly process, with some saying it's on the easy side — one reviewer says it took about one to two hours — and others claiming it's more difficult, such as this buyer whose review is entitled «not fun to assemble.»

The Internet is already brimming with misinformation, so be prepared to back up any claims you make with hard data and opinions from other experts or face a backlash from editors.

You can start claiming the credit in the tax year before the tax year in which the plan becomes effective, and you may carry it back or forward to other tax years if you can't use it in the current year.

Investible, a fund that has relied on a group of «super angels» to back early stage start - ups is halfway through closing its first big fund, claiming it is outperforming other local VCs.

Finally, there's the question of whether this money truly did come from American Media Inc., as claimed — or whether it traces back to Trump himself, companies controlled by him, or some other wealthy figure.

While there is plenty of room to explore this topic in future studies, the data confirms the intuitive claim, backed up by countless anecdotes, that potential drunk drivers will choose other options, like rides with Uber, when they are convenient, affordable, and readily available.

In other words, most observers claim they DO NOT have the dollars to back up all those Tether coins.

[That claim itself, of course, is wildly at odds with the statistical record, as confirmed by Unifor's recent report. We compiled historical data on 16 conventional economic indicators going back to 1946, and found that Canada's economy performed worse under Harper's leadership than any other postwar Prime Minister — and lagged most OECD countries during Harper's tenure, as well.

Unlike other bloggers, Kaushik backs up all his claims with actual data (he's a self - professed «web analytics ninja,» after all!)

Whether that's through God's Word, through prayer or through the encouragements of others around you, staking your claim as a child of God not only pushes the enemy back, but takes you closer to God.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

Again, if you disagree with this, prove the only thing that makes gravity stick to a 9.8 constant is god keeping his finger on the button and back it up with evidence, or else you're just making baseless claims and still gettting angry at other people for backing up their claims with hard evidence when you can not.

If you can provide one credible source, other than your mind, backing up that bull sh!t claim of 78 %, I will send $ 10,000 to any reborn church you choose.

The invented people are the Jews who have been coming back in droves with European features and genes from Europe and many other countries, as far away as even India, China and Ethiopia who claim Israel as their natural country or birthright with no connection other than» Their Religion».

- how you can claim it's a «morally good choice» to elect a president who wants to bring back waterboarding and other forms of torture, who wants to target the families of terrorists because «that's what they do to us,» and who admires the tactics of Vladimir Putin and Saddam Hussein

After the visitors had dispersed, a talmid stayed behind and led me by the hand, like a convalescent taking his first unsteady steps, back into the world where other people had claims on me, and back into the world of Talmud Torah.

You will never find ANY answers if you don't start employing LOGIC, stop putting words in other peoples mouths, and back up YOUR claims.

I don't mind them using their freedom of speech to lobby others to adopt their view, but constantly proposing spurious legislation with absolutely nothing concrete to back it up should be view the same way frivolous lawsuits are and those who can not give any evidence to their claims should be penalized for wasting everyone else's time.

If you consider all those other gods to be mythical creatures that never actually existed, but you claim that your God was different, then it's up to you to back up that claim and, so far, you have done rather poorly.

Theology backs up that claim by presenting a comprehensive, systematic account of reality in which all other knowledge can find a home.

I also love the fact that Christians will pump up their chests and claim they are over two billion strong and then claim that those catholics aren't real Christians, or another sect claiming that creationists are not true Christians, So how many true Scotsman / Christians are there when they seem to get great pleasure in stabbing each other in the back.

@Truth and Facts In other words, you can not back up your claim, so you will ignore the question in favor of a smart - a $ $ remark in a feeble attempt to brush it off.

Just like all the other religions, none are backed up by anything except someone claiming it to be true.

Another major factor is the claim of Orthodoxy to be the Church founded by Christ, led by bishops who were appointed by other bishops who were appointed by others back to the apostles themselves, a concept known as Apostolic Succession.

Some pastors and teachers say that we should not read Jesus back into the Old Testament, and other pastors and teachers claim the opposite, that we can not properly read the Old Testament unless we read them in light of Jesus Christ.

Then, once the «reproductive rights» language is adopted, CRLP and others take that language back to the legal systems of the participating nations and claim (as the CRLP did in its own lawsuit) that such «agreements... favor protection of reproductive rights, including abortion, as internationally recognized human rights.»

Therefore, after our imaginative interpretations are made with vigor in dispute with others in the church, we must regularly, gracefully and with modesty fall back from our best extrapolations to the sure apostolic claims that lie behind our extremities of imagination, liberal or conservative.

Back then, religious freedom advocates warned that «many of the claims made about the Jehovah's Witnesses practices could also be made of other religious communities practices as well.»

But does this entitle anyone to say: «This is where I am», in other words to say I am back in the time of Abraham and I can ignore what Christ said for the moment, and at the same time claim redemption and presume communion in the Mass?

Back then, as with the vast majority of believers, probably you, probably Rhology, all that was needed to persuade me was the claims from other believers that — «you are a lost sinner, God loves you, Jesus died for you... see, it's all right here in the bible, Gods word.»

If our theology causes us to bind heavy burdens on people's backs, while creating rules, restrictions, and regulations for how to live life with God and others, and we stifle people's joy, censor their love, and chide them for their grace, it is no wonder that people reject us and our theology, and maybe the God we claim to follow as well.

The claim is set forth that the one «who keeps the divinely appointed decrees and statutes with humility and an unfailing consideration for others, and never looks back, will be enrolled in honour among the number of those who are saved through Jesus Christ,....»

Now that you've admitted that, look back at some of your other false claims.

On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.

Of course there is the other alternative also — to fight back with an arrogance and just pile on more claims to counterattack the assault.

Just across the river was our «twin» city, Minneapolis, which back then touted itself among other things as the capital of the Bible Belt and whose radio stations, in earnest of this claim, carried a more than modest number of fundamentalist preachers.

Atheist here, read the bible front to back when I was 17, then again at 20, then finished it again at 26, then started it again at 27 but only got to Psalms before I put it down and started reading other books that claim divine origin, the bhagavad gita, books on ayurveda and even the book of mormon.

And I have come to the realization that there is nothing that will ever change a believer's mind, or even make them admit that they have nothing, other than faith, to back up their claims of a god.

When you try to make your religion dominant and other folks push back, you are not the victim no matter how loudly you claim to be.

The believer, in actuality, gets much more defensive, because they can not substantiate their claims, and feels offended because he is backed by many other delusional beings, thus wants the non-believer to surrender.

Other prophecies that jesus didn't fulfill is bringing all the jews back to israel (literally transporting them), being a great warrior leader, his lineage is definitly a problem because some claim that he was born of kings through his fathers line (josephs) but since he was emaculately conceived, then he doesn't have any of joseph's blood of genes or lineage.

fred... yes fred, i have a better way — but you sir, i have no need to keep this conversation going, for you are terribly thick headed, and beyond brainwashed by religion... you claim to believe the bible and what is has to say yet allow for me to be a di - ck to god without fear of recourse or any form of punishment from god — back in the day, i would have been smoted, now you losers claim that he will just torture me forever in hell as my punishment — this implies that god has learned better ways to function as god — whoa, did anyone else just see what i said, god learned... thats rather un-godly, to learn, being he is all knowing - but your right, i am wrong... jesus christ where did i put my fuk you card, oh god - dam - nit... i must have thrown it away with all the other garbage i don't use... well too bad.

I always look back and wonder how God views two groups of people so opposed ideologically, but each claiming that the other is being deceived by Satan,

If credence is given to the claim that the Katthavattu or fifth book was actually written in connection with the Third Council, then the scholastic development of Buddhism must go well back into early Buddhist times, because this book makes reference to at least two other parts of the pitaka.

Many bettors believe that oddsmakers overvalue the significance of playing on consecutive nights, while others claim that back - to - back games are only detrimental to a team if they're playing on the road due to the impact of travel.

The right - back may well be able to stake a claim for a place in the Gunners first - team squad, due to the injury sustained by Hector Bellerin, with Carl Jenkinson the only other option for the role at present.

Vincent and McEachran have split up previously, following a series of arguments, but decided to get back together and we can't rule out the same thing happening again with both parties claiming they still have feelings for each other.