Sentences with phrase «other claims give»

Some maritime liens and other claims give the relevant creditor a «secured» claim, one that is paid out first before the ordinary creditors.

Not exact matches

He turned away inquiries from others looking to turn an insurance claim into a reno: «I can't in good conscience give you a new kitchen when I have friends with no kitchen,» he'd say.

Two other parents standing outside the Guayama prison also claimed that their sons were being given cold meals.

A classic on persuasion from Robert Cialdini, Parrish claims Munger has «given away more copies of this book than any other.»

Thompson and others, however, argue that given the amount of resources Facebook is throwing into video, it is bound to solve these problems eventually, and doing so will make the platform — as well as other strong contenders such as Snapchat, which claims 10 billion video views a day — far more competitive when it comes to bidding for traditional consumer ad spending.

Such a decision could «give more hope to the Philippines and other Asian countries that claim territory in the South China Sea,» according to Andrew Scobell, a political scientist at the Rand Corp..

Broad Listening, on the other hand, claims that it can identify why people do things, or at least give the insights into why, so that a human can figure it out completely.

For this and other reasons, we have written that Trump is wrong to claim that Clinton «gave away 20 percent of the uranium in the United States» to Russia.

I riffed on the first part of this phony claim by Rep Ryan the other day — «Our plan is to give seniors the power to deny business to inefficient providers» — promising to get to the second part — ``... their plan [Affordable Care Act] is to give government the power to deny care to seniors» — later.

The group claims the amendments would give suppliers of lumber, natural resources and other commodities a more equal playing field during disputes.

Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.

Other claims, like charging stations that will give those trucks 400 miles of charge in 30 minutes, appear completely impossible.

And is not Rutledge the one giving the other side an unearned advantage when he suggests that secularists can make a special claim to ownership of the First Amendment?

«Mormons, Christians, and other cultists, read this:» Atheists constantly ask: «What gives you the right to claim you have the whole truth?»

To all others that make the claim that Mormons are not Christians, I must ask: What gives you the right to determine who is Christian and who is not?

So Huebert, if I understand you correctly you are saying that given a reliable subject with a genuine experience, there is no subjective way to determine that his observation and experience are anything other that what he claims.

(A decision for same - sex marriage by a state could as in the case of Massachusetts, preempts the debate in that state, but it is less far - reaching because it leaves other states to arrive at a different conclusion — unless, as some same - sex - marriage proponents have claimed, other states are required to recognize such marriages under the Constitution's requirement of giving «full faith and credit» to other states» proceedings.)

Perhaps because women are often honest about our relational needs, we frequently send this false message to women, implying — or blatantly claiming — once they wholeheartedly give themselves to a relationship with Jesus, they will no longer need the friendship, love, or companionship of other people.

But, on the other hand, it is quite unjustified for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and verbal methods so remote from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving as justification the claim that the alternative position of atheism is even more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic explanation at all).

Not only do my own private experiences of the bible's truth claims give me good reason to believe it's assessment, but the success and consistency of biblical anthropology in other quarters (not least literature and philosophy) means that I have absolutely no reason to be ashamed.

Surely you are aware that many have claimed they figured out the day Christ will return, and convinced their families and friends and sometimes others to sell everything (and interestingly this often involves giving the proceeds to the «prophet» who claims to have figured out the date of Jesus» return).

I don't mind them using their freedom of speech to lobby others to adopt their view, but constantly proposing spurious legislation with absolutely nothing concrete to back it up should be view the same way frivolous lawsuits are and those who can not give any evidence to their claims should be penalized for wasting everyone else's time.

for there is no other name under heaven [than the name of Jesus] given among men by which we must be saved» (Acts 4:12) would inevitably evoke vigorous discussion and extensive controversy, especially coming as it did just when the theology of Karl Barth was emphasizing again the uniqueness of Jesus and the centrality of his claims.

The point I wanted to make is that God invites His people to study His Word in depth, to use the minds that He gave us and renewed, to gradually discover the deep levels of His progressive revelation, and to compare the internal consistency of His message to claims from other religions which invariably crumble upon thoughtful analysis.

«Families would not have the significance they do for us if they did not, in fact, give us a claim upon each other.

I would imagine both sides could claim defense of their way of life, both could say they only do what they do to defend themselves from the other and each will claim the other is the bad guy and the way the other fights is cowardly - they use bomber vests, we use unmanned drones - one willing to give their lives the other not.

Arrogant is claiming that a supernatural figure gives you prophetic dreams, and expecting others to believe you just because you say so, Austin.

and now — for the THIRD time — I point out to you that I gave multiple categories for atheistic belief (which I NEVER claimed were exhaustive, but you are rightly deducing that I am pressing out many other forms of atheism as illogical or a form of cognitive dissonance).

If we agree with Zaret's claim that popular ideology among the laity has been a neglected feature of Puritanism, then Wallington's memoirs take on added significance: they give us a glimpse beyond the reconstructed categories that Weber and others have applied to Puritanism.

While we hear other Jews say holy books mentioned it as being the forbidden land for the Jews and not being the God given promised land as those under the cloth claim?

Here, and in other egalitarian literature, principle is given priority over application; admonition is given preference over description.34 What is dangerous in such a procedure, though it admittedly works in many cases, is the implied epistemological claim that objective, impersonal statements are of a somehow higher order of trustworthiness than the more personal and relational aspects of Scripture.

The more credence the world gives Iran, the more it will resort to outrageous claims and other public stunts.

(1) self - renunciation — to work for others by giving up personal claims to happiness; (2) intercessory prayer; and (3) «the mutual granting of forgiveness of sins in God's name.

What gives you (and a «few» others) the right to claim a huge part of it (and everything that comes along with it)?

A former Communist and Socialist who became an unvarnished anti-Semite and Nazi sympathizer, Rassinier did not initially deny the existence of death camps and gas chambers, but he claimed that the number of Jewish victims was hugely exaggerated, and that most of these were in fact murdered by other Jewish inmates who had been given authority within the camps.

Many people of differing political identities decried the interview before seeing it because it purportedly gave a platform — and therefore, sense of credibility — to the radio show host, who has claimed and stands by unfounded theories that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax staged by the U.S. government and that Barack Obama wasn't born in the U.S., among many other alarming conspiracies claimed without real evidence.

Christians who claim that they were healed due to prayer can not prove that their healing was not due to some other factor, such as the medication that their doctor was giving them or pure coincidence.

It is claimed that Jesus said to turn the other cheek and love thy enemy — given that how can they justify any war or any military response to Sept 11, 2001?

But what if we chose to give to others in a way that called us to rearrange our life to accurately reflect the values we claim to live by.

Because of this belief, he will vote for Romney: «If you claim Christ as your king, how on earth can you justify the murder of God given life through abortion or any other means?»

Emil Brunner stresses the theme of responsibility.6 Man is the being who can respond to the claim of the other, and give himself to the other.

Could you give us any examples of instances in which Jesus actually did claim de facto authority, in other words, examples where Jesus actually claimed to be God?

As for your other point; if someone does claim to be a Christian, and is rich, they are indeed commanded to give of their own money.

Those who claim to be Christian strive to follow the model he gave (one of total non-violence) and his teachings which incude love for neighbor and, more importantly, help other to put their hope — not in man's various pitiful efforts to rule themselves, all which have fallen way too short (since man was not created to rule man)-- but rather in God's Kingdom... the only true panacea to ANY and ALL of today's worldwide problems.

They add their «Rock» or religion to everything and claim thats what helps the poor and feeds the hungry or houses the homeless, but it's really the other ingredients i.e. the kind hearted people reaching out to help that gives them the facade of helpfulness.

The claim of Dewey and others that all knowing involves aesthetic valuation is intimately associated with the idea that knowing is purposive, that it is guided and given form by some end in view, some active concern of the knower.

Poetry's unique ability to penetrate and portray the prevalence of the world4 without making assertive claims of truth or falsity gives poetry a power of expression unmatched certainly by any other linguistic mode of utterance.

We have so many people that do not even know scripture enough to claim what is written yet condemn others when they uphold the word that God gave each of his sheep to pass down to the down and out and lost that we meet.

In other words, religion can, for the purpose of these theories, in principle be either reconstructed or abolished and seen as pointing to a more comprehensive theoretical system.4 By locating religion in a larger explanatory context it gives «its public claim to validity a purely relative value».5

With so many attempts to recast the first - century Jew, how do we tell him apart from the other incarnations that lay claim to his name, and what lies behind the recent drive by certain scholars to give Jesus a new identity?