Sentences with phrase «other climate blogs in»

I've only started reading this and other climate blogs in the last month and I am only just getting into the climate change literature in my own field.

Not exact matches

Let me amplify on # 37: here's the other RealClimate link (that James» blog point to) I should have put in my comment about climate sensitivity and how uncertainty in aerosols relates to future climate projection: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=115.

In summary, the problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated attacks against climate science are now being used against other climate researchers and the more technical blogs (e.g. Climateaudit, Lucia, etcIn summary, the problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated attacks against climate science are now being used against other climate researchers and the more technical blogs (e.g. Climateaudit, Lucia, etcin response to the politically motivated attacks against climate science are now being used against other climate researchers and the more technical blogs (e.g. Climateaudit, Lucia, etc).

A recent paper Internet Blogs, Polar Bears, and Climate - Change Denial by Proxy by JEFFREY A. HARVEY and 13 others has been creating somewhat of a stir in the blogosphere.

Yes, I know, not the best way to introduce how to wear satin but I thought I'd get that out of the way because some of you who read this blog live in tropical climates but for those of us who are now moving into Spring, it is nice, for a change, to wear satin elsewhere other than in bed (wink, wink).

Blog: The Quest to Save All Cats A field - wide plan to save more cats should take into account differences in climate, geography, community attitudes and many other issues.

As some here know, I and others have let it fly in blog magazines (google 14 most heinous climate villains), which reached a large youth and alternative press audience.

«I'll say this t the public Mr Interviewer, anyone who believes that the information on blogs like Judith Curry's and appearances by Lord Monckton is based on the scientific facts as contained in the IPCC reports and thousands of other Papers prodcued by 27,000 people in the climate field are fooling themselves.

Watch the first 1 to 2 minutes section of the UP Stream Pt 4 doco / research prject specifically being directed at all Climate Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the sClimate Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the sclimate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the sclimate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the science.

I have started a blog called the Climate Pioneer (theclimatepioneer.org) in which I aim, among other things, aiming to translate credible climate change science into common - speak for people like myself with a science background but who are at the same time not grounded in climate science Climate Pioneer (theclimatepioneer.org) in which I aim, among other things, aiming to translate credible climate change science into common - speak for people like myself with a science background but who are at the same time not grounded in climate science climate change science into common - speak for people like myself with a science background but who are at the same time not grounded in climate science climate science jargon.

But there has also been an «appraisal» of the paper by Nic Lewis that has appeared in no fewer than three other climate blogs (you can guess which).

Gavin Schmidt, the NASA climatologist and indefatigable curator of the Realclimate.org blog (photographed above by Keith Myers of The New York Times), has weighed in on the year of attacks, defense and reappraisal that he and dozens of other climate researchers experienced following the unauthorized release of folders containing hundreds of their e-mail exchanges and files last November.

Maybe I'm ignorant of the absence in coverage relating to our climate issues because I voluntarily seek out all articles pertaining to these multiple subjects covered here in Andy's blog, among other's.

The article and particularly the comments on «The Register» and myriad other loci of discussion (for instance, NY Times climate blog) tell us that until we can improve our collective understanding of science as a concept we can expect to encounter a lot of friction in any attempt to make progress in public and industry policy responses to GW.

A previous study by the same researchers questioning other climate research was rather harshly criticized by Realclimate.org and Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, writing in an online blog of the journal Nature.

The other would be to ramp up climate and space observations (instead of shredding budgets for relevant agencies), to boost the human capacity for resilience to climate extremes of all sorts, whatever the cause (a mantra on this blog), and to keep up a sustained energy quest to build a menu that works for the long haul — an imperative that is utterly sensible regardless of short - term ups and downs in temperature.

This shift away from CO2 - centric emissions debates is also evident in a group blog post by analysts at the Center for American Progress, who propose a «multiple multilateralism» approach on climate that, among other things, seeks quick steps on sources of warming other than carbon dioxide — particularly sooty Arctic pollution and gases already considered under the existing ozone - protection treaty.

Given the evidence that words may be relatively worthless in propelling change on energy and climate, other kinds of communication, from cartoons to folk songs to YouTube videos on geo - engineering, have as valid a place in the discourse as articles or, yes, blogs.

In relation to the above posts, and the drip drip drip effect of climate change, taking place so glacially - slow and yet very very real — and perhaps with huge ramifications for the future of humankind — I coined a new word the other day... and the inspiration for it came directly from this blog.

I am aware that there is a hugely varied readership of my blog; those who are very well informed about weather and climate, and others that have an interest in the subject but would struggle with some of the details contained in scientific papers.

Hundreds of comments and E-mail exchanges took place in 2011 between Andrew, members of John O'Sullivan's group of climate science «slayers» / Principia Scientific International (PSI) members and other parties and many have been posted on the Global Political Shenanigans blog since May.

Is it only me, or do others see that blogs like this show that climate science is in great shape!

On other blogs, one way to identify the climate skeptics is that they're the ones who talk in that dismissively pseudoscientific way.

If you've purchased offsets from terrapass within the last year (we're working on the honor code here), you're invited to put a terrapass badge on your blog or website to show others that you've taken action in the fight against climate change and global warming.

Today I offer this post as a «Summary for Policymakers» regarding my series of seven prior blog posts about a smear effort which took place back in 2007 that is a case study for examining other prior and current industry corruption accusations against skeptic climate scientists.

As alluded to in the blog post, three years earlier an article on the BBC about «climate porn» by none other than Richard Black, had interrogated, albeit sympathetically, the Independent's deputy editor on the noisy line the newspaper had taken with respect to climate change.

I hoped the blog post and my explanation would inspire other climate change alarmists to compose their own Explaining Climate Change in 200 words oclimate change alarmists to compose their own Explaining Climate Change in 200 words oClimate Change in 200 words or less.

A disconcerting feature of much commentary here and in other blogs is the relentless refrain claiming that the «climate system is chaotic.»

«One way or the other, Gleick's use of deception in pursuit of his cause after years of calling out climate deception has destroyed his credibility and harmed others,» wrote climate journalist Andy Revkin on his New York Times «Dot Earth» blog, adding, «The broader tragedy is that his decision to go to such extremes in his fight with Heartland has greatly set back any prospects of the country having the «rational public debate» that he wrote — correctly — is so desperately needed.»

A recent study involving visitors to climate blogs found that conspiracist ideation was associated with the rejection of climate science and the rejection of other scientific propositions such as the link between lung cancer and smoking, and between HIV and AIDS (Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, in press; LOG12 from here on).

In the United States, a critical role has been played by among others by environmental reporter Andrew Revkin, who at a critical point turned over his blog at the New York Times to largely serve as a forum for doubt and contrarianism about basic climate science.

While there are obvious prominent owners of right - leaning media, like Rupert Murdoch of Fox News and News Corporation who are climate change deniers or «doubters», the media in general in the United States and other key countries has suppressed or downplayed the story of global warming, delegating it to obscure web - only blogs or leaving it out entirely of their offerings.

From Paul Matthew's Climate Scepticism blog: In the blogosphere, the hoax paper by Lewandowsky, Oberauer and Gignac, NASA faked the moon landing — therefore, (climate) science is a hoax was exposed soon after it came out — see blog posts by Jo Nova, Steve McIntyre, Brandon Shollenberger, José Duarte and many Climate Scepticism blog: In the blogosphere, the hoax paper by Lewandowsky, Oberauer and Gignac, NASA faked the moon landing — therefore, (climate) science is a hoax was exposed soon after it came out — see blog posts by Jo Nova, Steve McIntyre, Brandon Shollenberger, José Duarte and many climate) science is a hoax was exposed soon after it came out — see blog posts by Jo Nova, Steve McIntyre, Brandon Shollenberger, José Duarte and many others.

For me, as with countless other skeptics, my engagement in the climate discussion started with me reading a blog written by a Canadian statistician with the temerity to challenge the orthodoxy and state, «YOU»RE DOING IT WRONG!!!

Chris Schoneveld: Aren't most of us on this blog interested in the science of «solar influence» on temperature / climate along with the science of other influences (e.g., trade winds «driving» the ENSO) and accurate gathering of data?

Back in the early spring of 2007, believers of catastrophic man - caused global warming were no doubt quite happy with Al Gore's «An Inconvenient Truth» movie, Ross Gelbspan's books, prominent pro-global warming blogs, mainstream media outlets, and others who gave essentially no fair play to the presentation of detailed climate assessments from skeptic climate scientists.

Expanded climate communications Heartland plays an important role in climate communications, especially through our in - house experts (e.g., Taylor) through his Forbes blog and related high profile outlets, our conferences, and through coordination with external networks (such as WUWT and other groups capable of rapidly mobilizing responses to new scientific findings, news stories, or unfavorable blog posts).

In that blog, I shared one example how I approached a successful author and organizer on climate change and other social justice issues.

A recent paper Internet Blogs, Polar Bears, and Climate - Change Denial by Proxy by JEFFREY A. HARVEY and 13 others has been creating somewhat of a stir in the blogosphere.

Well, I don't suppose anyone reads this far down the comments anyway — I usually don't — , so here goes: As much as I admire S. McIntyre and value his contribution in creating and maintaining this blog — and, for what it's worth, I see him as a veritable reincarnation of Richard Feynman in terms of scientific rigor and integrity and brilliance — , for me this post and some others similar to it are «Climate Audit Lite», which are ultimately not especially satisfying.

But, however one rationalizes it, this «lack of warming» has caused quite a bit of stir in climate circles (as witnessed by this and many other blog sites)

Meanwhile Gavin and the other members of the Team at the Real Climate (RC) blog have gone into overdrive in moderating any commenter who ask any reasonable questions about all of this.

*** Of course, Dr. Curry could handle such comments in the forthright, time - honored climate change blog manner of censoring comments, deleting them, or banning posters as we find at blogs like RealClimate, ClimateSight and others run by real scientists.

In this case, the diagram was taken from an article at Watts Up With That, entitled «Apparently, 4 degrees spells climate doom»; Google's «search by image» shows it has also appeared on a range of other blogs.

Theissen (2011) argued that many US undergraduate students are confused by a number of myths concerning climate change, propagated by blogs and media, and a similar «consensus gap» exists in other countries, for example Australia (Leviston et al. 2012; Lewandowsky et al. 2013).

Skeptical Science would be considered in direct antagonistic opposition to Watts Up With That, Climate Audit and all the other sceptic blogs.

In a series of blog posts published over ten days, McIntyre attacked climate scientist Professor Michael Mann in relation to a defamation suit the scientist brought against Canadian conservative commentator Mark Steyn and otherIn a series of blog posts published over ten days, McIntyre attacked climate scientist Professor Michael Mann in relation to a defamation suit the scientist brought against Canadian conservative commentator Mark Steyn and otherin relation to a defamation suit the scientist brought against Canadian conservative commentator Mark Steyn and others.

The debate is not about climate change, though it touches on the excess of the climate debate that have been observed on this blog, as well as in many other areas of public life.

(In other words, if you are a journalist, and you're unsure about where to go for a comment about climate change, you are doing the wrong job, and the discussions about mediocrity in the previous two posts on this blog apply to you absolutelyIn other words, if you are a journalist, and you're unsure about where to go for a comment about climate change, you are doing the wrong job, and the discussions about mediocrity in the previous two posts on this blog apply to you absolutelyin the previous two posts on this blog apply to you absolutely.)

Dear Judith Curry, I'm a retired public school teacher in Toronto who has been following your advice for a few years by somewhat reluctantly engaging various climate change sceptics and outright deniers in online media blogs and comment threads but when I encountered your Oct 1 piece entitled «Kill the IPCC:...» in Canada's Financial Post, I realized I had been following the advice of someone who has become something other than an impartial observer of the «climate change wars».