Sentences with phrase «other climate change deniers»

His story was picked up by hundreds of other climate change deniers, some of whom went so far as to claim that it destroyed global warming theory.

Its got me wondering how much of this strange anthropocentrism underpins other climate change deniers.

Not exact matches

«Greens have already come out against the referendum, lining up with Matthew Elliott of the Taxpayers» Alliance, and other right - wing climate change - denying loons.»

The ads, airing Tuesday through Oct. 23 on Syracuse broadcast and cable television stations, will inform voters of Buerkle's environmental record, according to the group.The League said it will spend $ 2 million on its «Flat Earth Five» campaign against Buerkle and four other House members who deny the existence of climate change.

Cuomo took issue with anyone who might deny climate change — saying Sandy and other major storms serve as proof.

Secondly, linked to that, I guess, is we're very, very concerned that the rhetoric of George Osborne and others threatens to undo all of David Cameron's nice words a couple of years ago about the environment, and climate change is happening, and there's no point in denying it.

To counter this effort, Maibach and others are using the same strategies employed by climate change deniers.

Among other changes, it is likely that climate change denier James Inhofe (R - OK) will take over Environment and Public Works.

Climate - change foes, on the other hand, are successfully changing people's minds — Republicans and Democrats alike — with messages denying the existence of global warming.

The acknowledged role of sunspots and cosmic rays in forming clouds has been fertile ground for climate deniers, who have cast doubt on whether anthropogenic climate change (in other words, change caused by humans) is occurring at all.

Although some correspondents seemed eager to jump to the exact global warming — denying conclusions Keppler and Röckmann had cautioned against, others expressed a more thoughtful attitude as to how this discovery might affect our understanding of global climate change.

Read all about climate denial scientist Willie Soon's dirty money from petrochemical billionaire Charles Koch, coal utility Southern Company, oil giant ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel companies to deny the science of climate change!

While Donald Trump denies the climate change, for the others climate change is happening and it can be seen.

The Golf's modular chassis architecture, which will spread to other VW models, permits the consecutive assembly of climate - change - denying Golfs fitted with combustion engines and eco-models riding along the line on yoga mats while using an app to chart the melting of glaciers.

Nothing that you list there is anything other than points that are repeatedly recycled by climate change deniers.

Already, deep fissures are emerging between, on one side, a base of ideological voters and lawmakers with strong ties to powerful tea - party groups and super PACs funded by the fossil - fuel industry who see climate change as a false threat concocted by liberals to justify greater government control; and on the other side, a quiet group of moderates, younger voters, and leading conservative intellectuals who fear that if Republicans continue to dismiss or deny climate change, the party will become irrelevant.

Sometimes it's easy to get the impression that public opinion on climate change is split down the middle, with concerned advocates for climate action on one side and science - denying conspiracy theorists on the other.

The video was hosted by PragerU, which also offers a presentation by Alex Epstein on why fossil fuels are «the greenest Energy,» and a variety of other videos from prominent climate change deniers including Bjorn Lomborg and Patrick Moore.

ALEC has issued «model legislation» or resolutions denying climate change, promoting climate change denial in schools, and supporting offshore drilling, among other bills.

His technical approach to making the case for climate change sets him apart from other «deniers» who are more politically motivated — though he does lament that Al Gore's once calming voice has become more shrill and made him popular with international media.

Away from the debate that only exists in Mann et al's heads — of one side representing the proposition «climate change is real», and the other side denying it — it seems that there is a widespread view that planet has warmed, slightly.

Your assertion that others are asserting that «the reality of «human - induced climate change» is of the same historical and evidence - based reality as the Holocaust» is incorrect, as is your confabulation of the meaning of the word «denier».

And in addition, think about all the wasted energy the «climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiClimate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capitalism.

For Dr. Trenberth, other null hypotheses have been reversed to include that the Climategate emails were «hacked», climate change skeptics are «deniers» and are not to be debated, and the media is «complicit in the disinformation campaign of the deniers».

The truth is that ALEC has crafted model legislation that misrepresents the science of climate change and hosted prominent climate science deniers at its conferences, and ALEC officials — including CEO Lisa Nelson — have refused to acknowledge or outright denied the scientific consensus that burning fossil fuels and other human activities are causing climate change.

But Modi has denied he is under pressure from other countries, after China and the United States announced a pact in November in the build - up to a UN climate change conference in Paris late this year.

None other than Monty Python legend Eric Idle asked where deniers like Roberts come from and how they get elected, adding that their denial of climate change is a danger to us all.

In addition to calling out the most prominent current climate change denier of them all — Donald Trump, we profiled eight other leading climate change deniers in the world of politics, individuals whom — as the commentary notes — have been responsible for «clouding the climate change debate» and stalling action by participating in «a campaign of deliberate misinformation.»

Such ironic attempts by climate change deniers, anti-vaxxers and other science critics to usurp the mantle of legitimate scientific skepticism is so commonplace it has a name — the Galileo Gambit.

In other words, advocates of climate change action, respond to claims of opponents to climate change programs by denying the factual claims of the opponents.

None of the funds made available to the Environmental Protection Agency by this division or any other Act may be expended for purposes of enforcing or promulgating any regulation (other than with respect to section 202 of the Clean Air Act) or order, taking action relating to, or denying approval of state implementation plans or permits because of the emissions of greenhouse gases due to concerns regarding possible climate change.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported, «In the high - stakes conflict over U.S. climate - change policy, groups that deny or cast doubt on global warming brought in $ 7.2 million from 2003 to 2010... «Powerful funders are supporting the campaign to deny scientific findings about global warming,» reported Robert J. Brulle...» In the eighth paragraph, the Inquirer noted the response by James Taylor of the Heartland Institute, who observed that many of the groups «support other causes as well» and, in some cases, spend «less than 10 percent of their funding... on climate - related efforts.»

The activist Lord Christopher Monckton is Rinehart's other favourite denier of the risks of human - caused climate change.

4 Aug: Crikey: Ellen Sandell: Abbott's European holiday might make him hot and bothered Abbott seems to still be confused about the science of climate change, moving between «climate change is absolute crap» and aligning himself with the climate deniers, and at other times accepting that climate change is a problem, but just not one worth acting efficiently on... All of this will be news to most Europeans, who have long accepted the science of climate change and have been measuring their CO2 emissions in tonnes through the trading scheme, and are benefiting from climate change solutions... Studies predict an increase of up to 6.1 million jobs in 2050, and the EU - wide emissions trading scheme is expected to generate between $ 143 billion and $ 296 billion over the next six years... Maybe on the plane on the way home to Australia, Abbott could use the time to catch up on some reading.

(Though some other Republicans are slightly embarrassed by him, so you never know — it might end up being some other person in the pocket of the oil and gas industry who denies the existence of climate change.)

This dataset, which was an unnecessarily redundant reproduction of several other similar studies, was constructed by a scientist who at the time was a climate change denier.

In reality, those who deny climate change and demand a halt to emissions reduction and mitigation work, want us to take a huge gamble with the future of every human being on the planet, every future human being, our children and grand children, and every other living species.

[Note: Other prominent deniers of natural factors being principal agents in climate change are also starting to see the light.]

While some of the defenders of the fossil fuel industries deny climate change, there are others like President Obama and those who support his energy policy, who simultaneously admit that climate change is a problem and continue encouraging the expansion of fossil fuel extraction and therefore its ongoing use.

Do you deny that all high ghg emitting developed nations under the UNFCCC has a duty to adopt policies that prevent harms from climate change to human health and ecological systems on which life depends which the nation is causing in other nations?

R Gates Yeah I do trust my own evaluation»cause apparently I'm an «individualist» not a «communitarian» Also I read Tonyb, Judith Curry, the Pielkes and many others who aren't part of the «consensus» but really, reading damn near everything on Sks and Real Climate turned me into a «denier» plus, my weak mind was warped by the Koch bros. and fossil fuel industry propaganda... and don't forget Limbaugh perhaps if I audit John Cook's class on the «science of climate change denialism» I can rehabilitateClimate turned me into a «denier» plus, my weak mind was warped by the Koch bros. and fossil fuel industry propaganda... and don't forget Limbaugh perhaps if I audit John Cook's class on the «science of climate change denialism» I can rehabilitateclimate change denialism» I can rehabilitate myself

Do you deny that all high ghg emitting developed nations under the UNFCCC has a duty to adopt policies that prevent harms from climate change to human health and ecological systems on which life depends in other nations?

You might want to address the Tunguska Event more carefully, in light of a new paper coming out, and possible additional attention it may attract: http://www.alphagalileo.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=readrelease&releaseid=510955 The paper does not deny the other factors involved in climate change, but points to the Tunguska Event as the kick off point.

While there are obvious prominent owners of right - leaning media, like Rupert Murdoch of Fox News and News Corporation who are climate change deniers or «doubters», the media in general in the United States and other key countries has suppressed or downplayed the story of global warming, delegating it to obscure web - only blogs or leaving it out entirely of their offerings.

Andrew Marr: No I was thinking of the climate change argument more, the climate change deniers, so called, um, their motive may be to, as it were, remove scare, you said they were going to make things scarier but actually it might be the other way, it might be...

Adam and the other Toastmasters, many of whom deny the science of climate change, still voted for me as the Best Speaker of our club that evening.

Along with many other economists, my view on global warming - associated climate change is that the world is most unlikely to be able to agree and coordinate globally, and then sustain for the centuries required, the growth - denying policies that would be needed if we were to limit human - induced global warming to any material effect beyond the [continue reading...]

There are at least three other reasons the oil companies» PR campaign has had success for climate change deniers.

I think the other point — you mentioned that not all the reserves are controlled by private corporations from which we can divest — that is really the other issue that Ben alluded to, which is that for a lot of these companies (you mentioned Exxon specifically), we have data to prove that as little as about 2 years ago, Exxon was actively funding climate change deniers about a mile and a half from where I am sitting here at MIT.

Google is the most prominent technology company that on one hand embraces the science of climate change, while on the other supports institutions dedicated to denying climate science, but it unfortunately is not the only one.