But while plenty of
other climate scientists hold firm to the idea that the full range of possible outcomes, including a disruptively dangerous warming of more than 4.5 degrees C. (8 degrees F.), remain in play, it's getting harder to see why the high - end projections are given much weight.
Not exact matches
The repercussions of the findings, which were published Thursday in Science, could make it harder to
hold warming to limits set during recent United Nations
climate negotiations — but they're being received cautiously by
other climate scientists, with questions raised over the results of the analysis.
But with Trump's inauguration it will be the beginning of the end for the Green Blob — that sinister cabal of corrupt politicians, UN - and EU - technocrats, bent
scientists, shrill activists, rent - seeking corporatists, blood - sucking lawyers and gullible journalists which has
held the world to ransom these last four decades by promoting the man - made
climate change scare story and
other, related environmental scams.
On what specific basis do you disregard the conclusions of the United States Academy of Sciences, and numerous
other Academies of Sciences around the World including the Royal Academy of the UK, over a hundred of the most prestigious scientific organizations whose membership includes those with expertise relevant to the science of
climate change, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and according to the American Academy of Sciences, 97 percent of
scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on
climate change whose conclusions
hold that the Earth is warming, that the warming is mostly human caused, that harsh impacts from warming are already being experienced in parts of the world, and that the international community is running out of time to prevent catastrophic warming.
On what specific basis do you disregard the conclusions of the United States Academy of Sciences, and numerous
other Academies of Sciences Around the World including the Royal Academy of the UK, over a hundred of the most prestigious scientific organizations whose membership includes those with expertise relevant to the science of
climate change, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and according to the American Academy of Sciences 97 percent of
scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on
climate change which conclusions
hold that the Earth is warming, that the warming is mostly human caused, and that harsh impacts from warming are already being experienced in parts of the world, and that the international community is running out of time to prevent catastrophic warming.
For years, Hansen's group at GISS, as well as
other leading
climate scientists such as Mann and Briffa (creators of historical temperature reconstructions) have flaunted the rules of science by
holding the details of their methodologies and algorithm's secret, making full scrutiny impossible.
This is certainly the scientific tenant I
hold to, I just wish more
others did as well - perhaps the
climate scientists and the IPCC will remember this in time for AR5...
Climate scientists hold no unknown treasure of knowledge that
others can't see.
On the
other hand, being aware of journalists» preferences, the
climate scientists may be the more encouraged talking to journalists the more certain and convinced they are of the publicly
held assumptions about
climate change.