Sentences with phrase «other climate scientists refusing»

Despite the IPCC and many other climate scientists refusing to link «extreme weather» to climate change, the Climate Council and the ABC are quite happy to do so as part of a co-ordinated scare campaign:

Not exact matches

Others have become more sceptical after reading the work of scientists who refuse to accept the broad consensus in their community about climate change.

I'd like to ask you, as a climate insider, whether climate scientists privately recognise the shortcomings of their subject — such as the hockey stick, or the poor quality temperature data — or whether they simply refuse to look at what Anthony Watts, Steve McIntyre, and others have unearthed.

Now you're saying there's some other «they» you meant... that your point was that if any climate scientist, anywhere refuses to give code and data to anyone who asks for it then the whole field is tainted.

PDA: «Now you're saying there's some other «they» you meant... that your point was that if any climate scientist, anywhere refuses to give code and data to anyone who asks for it then the whole field is tainted.»

This question is designed to expose that those politicians who refuse to reduce their government's ghg on the basis that they are not scientists can not ethically justify non-action on climate change on this basis because once they are put on notice by respected scientific organizations that ghg from their government jurisdiction are harming others, they have a duty to prevent dangerous behavior or establish credible scientific evidence that the alleged dangerous behavior is safe.

This sent a message not recognize any sort of «debate» about global warming, which was evidenced by mainstream climate scientists and other advocates refusing to debate skeptics.

As have the CRU team and many of the other leading climate scientists - the minute you refuse to accept you may be wrong and seek to shut off all dissent / questions, is the minute you stop being a scientist.

But of course, despite 25 + years to top shelf «high end» climate research, no, this is still not enough for Richard and so many others who have refused to listen to the scientists for decades and continue to not look at scientific evidence nor the conclusions.