There are numerous Youtube video's of Dr. Judith Curry testifying before Congress (
other climate scientists too).
Not exact matches
Just days before the Guardian piece with Walker's statement was published, NASA
climate scientist Gavin Schmidt, who declined to be interviewed again for this story, told Business Insider that he thought NASA
climate research was safe from political tampering because it was
too intimately connected to the agency's
other critical earth science missions.
Climate scientists, however, are only
too aware of the problems (see
Climate myths: It was warmer during the Medieval period), and the uncertainties were both highlighted by Mann's original paper and by
others at the time it was published.
I
too feel it is important for
scientists to study
climate, and to express their views on
climate change to
others.
Other climate scientists, though, are wary of just how skillful such predictions can be and cautioned against drawing
too firm a conclusion from them.
«I'm aware of similar large changes in odds in
other studies of wintertime high temperature events over the U.S., and so this is not
too surprising,» Martin Hoerling, a
climate scientist at the Earth System Research Laboratory, said.
You yourself have now sent a Lindzen letter to the WSJ, you say, but
other well - known
climate scientists among your colleagues could submit op - ed queries, and for that matter you still could
too.
The arguments between
climate scientists on the one hand and the befogged archipelago of deniers, lukewarmers and «auditors» on the
other is getting
too arcane and convoluted for me.
Here in England our leading
climate scientists Proff Grubb at University College London and Prof Myers at Oxford have published that they now accept as Dr Curry has been saying for a long time that the ipcc and
other mainstream academic
climate models were not actually very good and were definitely projecting
too hot predictions for global temperature increases.
There are
other reasons,
too, why the public hears so little in detail from those
scientists who approach
climate change issues rationally, the so - called
climate sceptics.
In fact Andrew Dessler and
other climate scientists have made this point, that the «instrumental» method uncertainties are
too large to tightly constrain
climate sensitivity, because of the uncertain aerosol forcing, among othe reasons.
Records of the past were mostly
too fuzzy to show rapid changes, and where such a change did plainly appear,
scientists readily attributed it (usually correctly) to something
other than
climate.
Were
too many
climate scientists unaware of the CMIP5 and
other model (s) results?
While
scientists knew that volcanism caused
climate change, new research suggests it goes the
other way
too Read More
The bit in my A.T. piece was how Robert McClure (a Society of Environmental Journalists board member who had previously offered me the unsupported idea that Gelbspan's work was also documented by
others) quoted Dykstra's concern over skeptic
climate scientist Patrick Michaels getting
too much «false» media balance.