«All the claims made by M&M have been rebutted in detail by
many other climatologists and they insist that these folks are completely in error.»
Over all, the authors and
other climatologists told me, the link strongly implies that a warming world will be a more downpour - prone world.
And even if this mechanism was shown to occur in the atmosphere,
other climatologists say this wouldn't mean it caused our current state of global warming.
All the claims made by M&M have been rebutted in detail by
many other climatologists; M&M insist they are completely in error.
Nor the thousands
of other climatologists and their advocates who have been labouring mightily (but still unsuccessfully) to make a silk purse of alarmism out of a sow's ear of supposed science for thirty years.
Nevertheless,
other climatologists are relieved to see a possible solution to the ocean - cooling conundrum.
Other climatologists, especially those who study Earth's past, were much more positive about the paper, describing it as a necessary improvement to how we understand current climate models.
But
other climatologists are calling for consequences.
And the ones that do are called «climatologists» and are conducting their work right alongside all
the other climatologists and are talking about the actual weaknesses of the theories and data, which unfortunately for the «skeptics» turns out to be a lot less than they'd like to think.
That's not dramatic; it's a likely outcome, according to Rahman and many
other climatologists, who predict that at least 17 percent of Bangladesh will be submerged by 2100 (assuming a likely three - foot sea level rise).