Sentences with phrase «other commentary here»

As a fellow troll, it's hard to be wrong wrt other commentary here.

Not exact matches

While I post some of my informal studies here on this blog, most of my formal studies will be posted over at my other website: Grace Commentary.

The material has its origins in conferences given at Pluscarden and other religious houses and is primarily a commentary on Saint Benedict's writings for those who have placed themselves under his Rule, but the heading «quisquis» (literally «anyone») implies that here is wisdom for everyone who sincerely seeks to «prefer nothing to the love of Christ», a goal that ought to be shared by all the baptised.

Its a sad commentary that all of the posters here want to convince others to disavow their faith.

On this page we will have the goals video from the match as soon as they are scored while immediately after the final whistle match highlights will be placed here in english and other commentaries.

Given the extensive commentary by this columnist here and on various other media, I find it quite curious that anyone is surprised about a looming recession.

In our first commentary on the Abu Ramadan Cases published here on 30th June, 2016, we put forth the following three propositions in response to certain arguments advanced by others in the wake of the Supreme Court's 5th May, 2016, judgment and orders.

Some other commentaries have come to similar conclusions: James Annan (here and here), and there is an excellent interview with Nathan Urban here, which discusses the caveats clearly.

They give good commentary, chatting about this and that without leaving much in the way of dead air, and the fact that the conversation frequently ranges way beyond Chopping Mall to consider other films and pop - culture markers from the era (programmable robot toys, FANGORIA magazine, the long, slow demise of Radio Shack) is frankly a relief given the sheer quantity of content here.

Aside from the alternate version, here we have a running commentary track with Peter Bogdanovich (who contributes most of the insightful - if - already - well - acknowledged elements of the film and its place in the Hitchcock legacy), Joseph Stefano, and about two dozen other people.

While the scenes here are entertaining, it comes as a slight disappointment that other excisions mentioned in the commentary don't appear here.

The two commentaries here, one by Imogen Sara Smith and the other Alan Silver and James Ursini, are of good quality.

Badham's 2002 commentary here, knowing what's generally known about some of the background of the movie, at times seems disingenuous and, at others, ungracious.

If you've ever heard one of Marshall's commentaries, then you know how he can ramble and he does so here, although having other people in the room often keeps him in check.

Disappointingly, they reference other commentaries and a making - of documentary that aren't here (more on those later).

Sadly, the other extra that joined the commentary on Paramount's 2002 DVD — the film's original theatrical trailer — is not included here.

Please click HERE for reviews and commentary about other fine books produced in this way by UP since March of 2000.

Anyway, a few deaths happen here and there and I give a lot of commentary on the Xbox One not having USB storage support and some other things along the way.

The New England Journal of Medicine has published «Ebola and Quarantine,» an invaluable commentary by seven physicians * who warn how overreactions by American elected officials aiming to calm fears of Ebola here could make it more likely that the virus will spread in Africa and possibly other developing regions of the world.

Anonymous commentary is not banned here in part because some people, for professional or other reasons, can't weigh in freely under their real names.

Saving others the trouble, here the chart with that 38 period moving average, dubbed «Doing a Spencer» Maybe the good Dr. could give a creative writing commentary to this odd behavior, leading the eye, which is not really fixed time cycling, just another way to reveal that UAH has the same undertone as all other temp tracking products of trending up.

A disconcerting feature of much commentary here and in other blogs is the relentless refrain claiming that the «climate system is chaotic.»

I'm not attacking you, you clearly keep to that standards allowed here; I'm asking why Nice One has drawn a moderation comment for a very mild remark when commentary that in other circles could lead to blood shed is passed.

And at some point someone here is going to call anyone who is not convinced by this uncited, in - expert commentary (anyone, in other words, who accepts the mere possibility that the billions of humans on the planet and their massive technocracy might, just might have an effect on the environment) as a «true - believer.»

After reading Zeke's explanation of the data processing (an excellent job, by the way, along with his follow ups to other other commenters), Mosh's continuing efforts to educate us on BEST's work, and a host of other data related posts and commentary that have appeared here over the years, it is patently apparent that the historical data record is simply not able to support the conclusions that are being so heroically extracted from it.

Here's the portion of that commentary that reminds us of «The Charge»: «Beginning in the 1970s, regulators around the world followed Rachel Carson's suggestion that lawmakers ban the pesticide DDT, once used to control malaria, because they figured bed nets and other measures were enough.

There will be other commentaries, written by better writers than me (see links), on this Senate report so there is no point in me going into much detail here.