However, the Commission — and
other competition authorities in Europe — are far from being the pathfinders in encouraging private action to claim redress.
It seems likely that the CMA's final position may be referred to by
other competition authorities in their treatment of MFNs in the future.
Not exact matches
These risks and uncertainties include, among
others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and
other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to
competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory
authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
The acquisition, which is conditional upon approval from the
Competition and Markets
Authority, will see Kent Frozen Foods join Sysco's
other UK businesses, including Brakes, Fresh Direct and M&J -LSB-...]
The acquisition, which is conditional upon approval from the
Competition and Markets
Authority, will see Kent Frozen Foods join Sysco's
other UK businesses, including Brakes, Fresh Direct and M&J Seafood.
Recommendation 4 The Committee recommends that mandatory notification of retail grocery store acquisitions by publicly listed corporations be prescribed within the mandatory Code of Conduct (Recommendation 5), and approved by the Australian
Competition and Consumer Commission, with a requirement that the Australian
Competition and Consumer Commission consult with local
authorities and
other relevant parties in order to make an informed assessment of the likely impact on local businesses of such acquisitions.
After its inception in 2011, clubs that qualified for any UEFA
competition were required to prove that they did not have any overdue payables towards any
other clubs, players, or
authorities throughout the season.
We also need to get everything sorted for environmental agencies, financial watchdogs,
competition authorities and countless
other bodies most of us don't think about on a day - to - day basis.
«We are in
competition (with
other schools), but we also talk to each
other and support each
other through the local
authority, and I really think it's helped drive up standards in the whole of Hackney whether maintained schools or academies.»
Conducts ongoing cooperative programs with
other national
competition authorities that are responsible for airline
competition and economic regulation of commercial aviation (e.g., EU, Canada, Australia, Japan, India).
The analytical and advisory functions of the Division frequently involve interaction with Capitol Hill,
other U.S. Government agencies, including the Departments of Justice, State, and Commerce, and the transportation and
competition authorities of foreign governments.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward - looking statements include, without limitation, possible product defects and product liability, risks related to international sales and potential foreign currency exchange fluctuations, the initiation or outcome of litigation, acts or potential acts of terrorism, international conflicts, significant fluctuations of quarterly operating results, changes in Canadian and foreign laws and regulations, continued acceptance of RIM's products, increased levels of
competition, technological changes and the successful development of new products, dependence on third - party networks to provide services, dependence on intellectual property rights, and
other risks and factors detailed from time to time in RIM's periodic reports filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and
other regulatory
authorities.
Region: Cusco Date: All September Location: Cusco & The Sacred Valley of the Incas Details: Celebrated with cultural conferences, artistic exhibitions, adventure sports
competitions, tourism visits, encounter of
authorities, civic acts, artistic - cultural work presentation, among
others.
This post concerns a bit of a Dutch thing, namely the «position» of the Dutch National
Competition Authority ACM on an agreement by electricity producers active on the Dutch market, but it is interesting more generally for those who are interested in the relation between (EU) competition law and other issues like sust
Competition Authority ACM on an agreement by electricity producers active on the Dutch market, but it is interesting more generally for those who are interested in the relation between (EU)
competition law and other issues like sust
competition law and
other issues like sustainability.
He has also represented clients in federal grand jury investigations into alleged cartel activity and
other criminal offenses, in premerger reviews before federal and state antitrust
authorities, and in proceedings with
competition authorities outside the United States.
The firm advised Klaas Puul, the second - largest producer and wholesaler of seafood in northwest Europe, on its immunity application to the European Commission and
other national
competition authorities to avoid liability for anticompetitive behaviour between wholesalers.
This provision must be read in conjunction with Recital 6, which states that «administrative proceedings leading to sanctions such as
competition, trade, tax, financial services proceedings and
other investigations by administrative
authorities in relation to these proceedings, and also civil proceedings are not covered by this Directive.»
On the
other hand, the CJEU does leave the door open for the disapplication of EU
competition law if the undertakings have tried to address the situation with the
authorities and / or there is no restriction by object.
As
competition authorities in Asia have gained experience, they have become more confident in joining
competition authorities in
other regions to crack down on multijurisdictional infringements when there is a local connection.
On 29 September 2004 the Danish
competition authority decided that Post Danmark had abused its dominant position by (amongst
others) targeting the three customers of FK with very low prices (so - called predatory pricing).
We regularly appear before these and
other key
competition authorities, including state attorneys general.
EU legal professional privilege has developed in a particular field of EU law, namely EU
competition law, in the context of investigations carried out by the competent EU
competition law
authority, the European Commission (the Commission) into violations of the provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union prohibiting anticompetitive agreements and abuse of a dominant position (although, in principle, the privilege could protect communications relating to
other proceedings brought by the Commission in which the rights of defence arise).
Recent work includes the defence of a large financial institution in connection with the LIBOR and FX investigations conducted by the Criminal and Antitrust Divisions of the DOJ, the CFTC, the SEC, the FCA and a range of
other international criminal,
competition and regulatory
authorities across Europe.
Our lawyers have represented clients in both civil and criminal antitrust investigations initiated by the Department of Justice, the FTC, the CFTC in the U.S. and DG Comp in the EU,
Competition and Markets
Authority in the UK and its equivalent in
other countries.
The Damages Directive, which was implemented in the United Kingdom in March 2017, provides that final decisions of national
competition authorities (or review courts) in
other member states may be presented before national courts as at least prima facie evidence that an infringement of
competition law has occurred.
com GLOBAL CARTEL REPORT: ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT
AUTHORITIES REMAIN ACTIVE DESPITE NEARLY 50 % DROP IN FINES Produced by the firm's leading antitrust and competition team, the cartel report is a compre - hensive analysis exam - ining the following 2017 trends in antitrust compli - ance programmes and antitrust criminal liability: • A significant uptick in enforcement directed toward domestic cartels and individual criminal prosecutions • Continued scrutiny of the auto parts, financial services, and shipping in - dustries • A prioritization by more countries of anti-cartel enforcement, particular - ly in Asia • The expansion of glob - al authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcem
AUTHORITIES REMAIN ACTIVE DESPITE NEARLY 50 % DROP IN FINES Produced by the firm's leading antitrust and
competition team, the cartel report is a compre - hensive analysis exam - ining the following 2017 trends in antitrust compli - ance programmes and antitrust criminal liability: • A significant uptick in enforcement directed toward domestic cartels and individual criminal prosecutions • Continued scrutiny of the auto parts, financial services, and shipping in - dustries • A prioritization by more countries of anti-cartel enforcement, particular - ly in Asia • The expansion of glob - al
authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcem
authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment
authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcem
authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing
others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement Report.
The FCA furthermore has the power to refer a market to the
Competition and Markets
Authority (CMA) for a detailed «phase 2» market investigation, the outcome of which could include forced divestments or
other major interventions.
BINDING EFFECT OF DECISIONS BY
COMPETITION AUTHORITIES The new law introduces a binding effect of decisions made by courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringeme
COMPETITION AUTHORITIES The new law introduces a binding effect of decisions made by courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringeme
AUTHORITIES The new law introduces a binding effect of decisions made by courts and
competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringeme
competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringeme
authorities of
other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (fault).
Decisions rendered by
competition authorities in
other EU Member States will have evidential value in relation to proving an infringement, but could be rebutted by defendants.
This is important as you will face a lot of
competition from
other candidates who may not be better at their work but be more successful in getting through to the hiring
authority.