Sentences with phrase «other conflicts do»
Word War I inspires developers to teach something about the futility of war in a way that other conflicts don't.
http://www.zam.com/ Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
This is a rebate, so it doesn't conflict with any of the other savings methods!
The Economic Policy Institute has constructed more comprehensive estimates and finds that the 60 - day delay would cost retirement savers» IRAs $ 181 million this year and $ 3.7 billion over the next 30 years — and this estimate is still an undercount because it does not include other subjects of potential conflicted advice, like 401 (k) s.
Even if you and I are having benign conflict, at some point we need to be doing other things,» she says.
Prodding your people to be less conflict adverse can lead to real benefits, according to Thompson who cites recent research that shows, «brainstorming groups that engage in open debate, challenging each other in benevolent ways, perform better than groups that don't have any debate at all.
While I did manage to get along with most and outlast others, some conflicts did end badly.
We don't get paid via commission, referrals or by any other conflicted means.
If it tried to do other potentially conflicting things, such as keeping unemployment artificially low or containing volatility in the financial markets, its credibility could erode, the virtuous circle could break down and inflation could go back to being unpredictable.
They do NOT accept commission on products sold or any other forms of compensation from third parties, eliminating conflicts of interest related to compensation and allowing for objective advice.
We offer you complete objectivity because we have no affiliations or financial arrangements with third parties that might distort our objectivity or present conflicts of interest, nor do we sell mutual funds, insurance or other products.
Beginning after World War II, the United States gradually reduced its import taxes and pushed other nations to do the same, seeking not only to promote increased trade but to prevent conflict.
[2] That the board has a conflict of interest thus does not necessarily mean that their conduct will be inconsistent with the best interests of any or all of the corporation's other constituents.
This discipline may be imperfect, but it doesn't work worse for corporate speech than for other types of decisions where managers» interests conflict even more directly with those of the corporation.
I am curious how do others deal with this conflict.
It can particularly put business partners into conflict with one another if one has a qualifying equity stake in a home and the other does not, since the home - owning partner will be required to assume this risk to proceed with the loan application.
You suggesting atheists do not sort out conflicting emotions on right wrong / good evil or use some other measuring stick.
First, people often kill other human beings because they believe that the creator of the universe wants them to do it... Second, far greater numbers of people fall into conflict with one another because they define their moral com.munity on the basis of their religious affiliation...»
One that is just, and merciful, and concerned with how we treat each other and our world (because yes, the Tanach has instructions on how we are to treat even our animals)... or one that just makes willy - nilly laws, fails to spell out what he wants in a single, comprehensive passage (since there are conflicting passages all through the bible), and then gets his rocks off on sending people to «hell» to suffer eternally when they don't figure it out right.
The controversy has been created by CNN so they can make more money throwing people against each other and creating conflicts that doesn't exist.
I suspect it has never crossed your mind to ever complain about the whining of other groups with views that happen to agree with yours or, at least don't conflict with them.
i; m not sure i follow your little brother thing, but sharing ideas and a conversation with two differing view points is a debate, and if both parties don't try to kill the other one this is a world of understanding thru conflict, for a differing point of view is in confliction with the others.
I also believe in God, and I respect the Bible as a work of inspiration, and a source of inspiration, but I don't believe it is necessarily historical, and I certainly don't believe its creation stories should be taken literally, since the various stories conflict with each other.
Our love of the past conflicts often with your plans for the future; our love of order does not show up on abstract statistics; our tendency to look to each other for affection and support stands against a minister's wish to obtain emotional support away from the small church.
Gambling your soul away on a guess based on ancient texts out of fear of torture doesn't sound logical at all, especially considering how many other versions of the scriptures have been found and conflict with today's bible.
The problem is that their «Jesus» doesn't ask them any hard questions; but is more like a child's «invisible friend» who is always on thier side whenever they find themselves in a conflict with others.
How do you solve this conflict and keep from swinging too far one way or the other (if you think we even need to try)?
The other side of this is whether Milbank can do justice to the particularities of history, such as the practice and teaching of Jesus in its Jewish context, and the complexity of crises, conflicts and points of tension.
Man's call to majesty on the one hand and to humility on the other, to take Ziegler's title example, do certainly conflict, and a religious personality loyal to both will experience considerable tension in his struggle to achieve balance between the two values.
One other comment... when I was a pastor doing pre-marital and marital counseling, I used to encourage couple in conflict to agree on how and when they want to resolve the conflict before they tried to resolve the conflict itself.
It is a conscious part of low - intensity - conflict strategy that other people do the dying in the U.S. war against the poor.
I can agree that there is validity in the revelation presented in other religions, philosophies, etc... and that admitting that there is truth somewhere in those revelations does not have to conflict with a belief that Christ was THE revelation.
Why does religion in America not produce or encourage lethal conflict, as it does in Northern Ireland, the Middle East, the subcontinent of Asia, and many other places?
Persons who are highly constricted by anxiety and inner conflicts, which do not improve substantially with therapy, should find fulfillment in directions other than group leadership.
But it does not fulfill the demand, because even free planning simultaneously creates more and more unforeseen factors, brings about situations with which the planner had not reckoned, simply because even the subtlest planning must always and will always have to reckon with an unplanned and not wholly intelligible material and because the planning itself even in the future will never originate from a single planner but will perpetually come into ever greater conflict with the plans of others which have not been taken into account.
It's only those that don't love themselves enough, that need the ego boost from others to feel good about who they are, that conflict can arise.
I hate those studies, it is conflicting people against each other... That's why i am Spiritual inside and don't need a church or gold chained priest teaching me, how to live MY life... Hallelujah!
The reference to nonviolence has been separated from the context where it was to be directed at «other life forms» and been scaled back to «practic [ing] nonviolence... to resolve conflict,» although there does remain a suggestively malleable remark about «awakening to a new reverence for life.»
So - called religious people who engage in conflict with others are actually doing the work of Satan.
If there is a god out there, he sure doesn't get involved in what's going on down here on Earth, so I'm pretty sure he's not going to hold me to some text written by different men conflicting each other's doctrines.
This scripture does nt conflict in these verses we see the truth exposed as God allows satan to have limited power over his people to test them as in the story of Job.So was it God who tested job by allowing satan to bring trails upon him.Or was it satan who was the one testing him.Both are involved but the motivations are completely different Gods purposes are to build up his people.Satan on the other hand wants to destroy there is this conflict at work all the time.brentnz
Your point is not well taken most of the atheist do not hate religions at all, if the devout would just stay out of trying to run other peoples lives there would be no conflict.
They are in conflict with each other, so that you are not to do whatever you want.
An enabler serves others» vision; a conflict manager does not complicate the scene with one more contending point of view.
For example, when Mark says that war / conflict is inevitable, I would agree with your argument that if it is absolutely wrong to ever go to war, then Christians should still refuse to do so even if other people are going to — except that I don't agree with your assumption that it is absolutely wrong to ever go to war.
Now let us have a cloose look at modern man or say Politics Today where you drop all that behind and do as Personal Interests with out any commitment verbal or written Just Buy and Sell at Sale they Trade with the Fate, Faith and destiny of World and New Worlds Nations and that is why no conflict ever settled among nations but getting even worse and Modern Prophets of Inspiration and Knowldge Remind and Warn of World Food and Waters about Famine in the world and the need for working agianst that otherwise nations would become as Live Zombies eating each other flesh.
Hence they do not conflict directly with each other — even though they can not be combined into one model because there is little overlap in the positive analogies.
Other than that, an Atheist could indeed go to Church or attend other religious ceremonies as these acts do not conflict with being an AthOther than that, an Atheist could indeed go to Church or attend other religious ceremonies as these acts do not conflict with being an Athother religious ceremonies as these acts do not conflict with being an Atheist.
What neither could see was that the very thing they were doing to deal with the conflict in the marriage was causing the other person to respond the way they were.
There is, on the one hand, a school of Christian thought that believes war could be eliminated if only Christians and other men of good will refused resolutely enough to have anything to do with conflict.