Sentences with phrase «other contexts take»

Many courts in this and other contexts take a position that until domestic violence is proven, it is not a domestic violence case.

Not exact matches

CFOs voiced strong opposition to metals tariffs, especially in the broader context: potential retaliatory moves taken by other countries.

The other three elements that matter are where the conversations take place (context), when the conversations take place (time), and, most important of all, who is speaking.

Now, Craig Lack and other leaders from around the world take those same principles and present them in modern context to help you learn to achieve your greatest desires.

If a Bible verse (or discovery) is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical or metaphorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is an ancient cultural anomaly; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.

it is only useful as a history of the hebrews, (old testament) when taken in context with the writings of the other early civilizations in the middle east some of which have only recently been deciphered.

If a Bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either; (i) taken out of context; (ii) symbolic, allegorical or otherwise means something other than it says; (iii) referring to another verse somewhere else that rectifies the error; (iv) a translation or copyist's error; (v) a mystery of God not discernible by we mere humans; or (vi) just plain magic.

Earlier (since you want to take my other writings into this context) I also said that I would be the last to claim that there were no moral non-Christians or that all Christians were highly moral.

No effort to understand others, and a lot of very superficial comments that take bits of information out of context, and sensationalize them.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernable by humans; or is just magic.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is an ancient cultural anomaly; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.)

But on the other hand, people have «cherry picked» to state that God hates one group over another and as a young believer someone once pointed out that Psalm 14:1 can be taken out of context to say «there is no God.»

At the other extreme are theologies that take the best of contemporary thought as normative and then explain what sense can be made of basic biblical ideas in this context.

If, for example, our reflection on other animals takes place in the context of the conviction that Christ is in them and they are in Christ, that we and they are members one of the other, and that together we build up the body of Christ, it would no longer be possible to turn our backs upon their suffering with indifference.

While it is of course true that those who belong to this school are perhaps most vocal in their assertion that in our Lord alone may God be seen at work, and while it is they who denounce the concept of «general» revelation as a vain fancy of sub-Christian speculation, a considerable number of other Christian thinkers take what in effect is the same position when they make central to their teaching a kind of uniqueness in the coming and the person of Christ which effectively removes him from the context of the total sell - expressive operation of the Eternal Word.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernable by humans; or is just plain magic.

And after my young friend leaves me and turns her back again on her family, once more to take refuge in the commands of her master, I rejoin that community of scholars and reflect on the religious context of what has gone on here, just as it has in a hundred other interviews.

Taken in this context, masturbation and whether or not it is a healthy expression of sexuality for a particular individual become questions of whether or not the acts of masturbation at a particular season of life are drawing you deeper into isolation from others and from God, or into deeper connection and intimacy.

A «natural grouping» is a small social unit made up of people whose fives are in some measure interlaced and who provide for each other a stable context in which the orderly transmission of values can take place from parents to children.

The Pentecostal teachings have been more easily translated into other contexts, as the rise of the charismatic movement indicates, and the most creative Pentecostal theology is taking place in that dialogue.

When Santorum couldn't admit he said he didn't want to improve black people's lives by giving them other people's money, even though the tape recording, taken together with the context of what he was saying, clearly shows that he said black, then that's dishonesty, that's lying, something that his christian faith should have informed him about.

Of course, the phrase is taken out of context, and others could be found (e.g., Exod.

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

In this regard, it is interesting to note the extent to which the media context is beginning to be taken seriously by other professional and educational organizations.

Taking these and other events out of context makes you sound like Obama.

For the rest of the world, the numerous other places where apostacy is punishable by death is taken literally — though even more important are the passages to «tolerate» those of other religions — but the Context is ALWAYS to subjugate them under the Muslims with an end goal to subjugate the world to Islamic rule.

I have said all this because I wish to emphasize in this chapter that the proper setting for preaching should be the Eucharist — although of course there will be other important occasions when the proclamation of the gospel will stand by itself or take place in other contexts.

How different would be our thinking about the Atonement in such a context — to take but one other example.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.»

Christian theologians have increasingly come to view their work in a global context that takes seriously the other great religious traditions or Ways of humankind.

«When the plain sense of scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense; therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context, studied in the light of related passages and axiomatic and fundamental truths indicate clearly otherwise» (Dr. David L. Cooper)

For you to suggest that there may be some other «valid» interpretation if one takes into consideration the «historical / cultural context of scripture», is to invoke a straw man logical fallacy.

When we do this, we see that it can have various applications in various contexts, but ultimately, it is about helping the values and goals of God take root in our personal lives so that we live and act in way toward others which helps them come to experience God's values and goals in their life as well.

It is true however that there are people of all religions who pick and choose, take things out of context, and use them to condone their own actions while condemming others.

This passage of Scripture (Mark 16:17 - 18) that this Pentecostal preacher and others are basing the practice of «Snake Handling» on is taken OUT OF CONTEXT and MISUNDERSTOOD by them.

Bruce Malina and other Context Group members take the position that the unprofitable servant is actually the hero of the parable, and that the Master is an exploitive patron, rather than God or Jesus.

Then we take a closer look at other stories involving Jesus and food or drink, we notice that He meets people in their cultural context — their comfort zone.

The statement that you make re «do unto others... etc.» is taken out of context, and that is why you think it is mundane.

When we take over Paul's theology of the cross without exegeting our context, this theology, originally conceived as a means of harnessing power for the sake of others, becomes a rationalization of our powerlessness, our spiritlessness — the jaded, enervated religious malaise of twilight Christendom.

In the process of humanization, on the other hand, the evolution takes place within the context of the historical, from an uncivilized, impersonal, inhuman historical situation, for example, to a civilized, interpersonal and more human one.

They take portions of verses and use them out of context so they can feel better about the horrible way they treat others.

This going theory does fit Occam's Razor quite nicely and in all honesty lines up with how we treat other books of the Bible — we take note of the writer, their context, etc. and see inspiration coming through that lens.

My case was one in which the author, editor and reader are all known entities (in fact, they all know each other personally); the reading takes place in the exact same cultural and social context as the writing and editing; and the reader is himself a really smart guy, Ivy - league Ph.D. and all, who had spent a decade training the editor to be a certain kind of editor, with specific tools unique to the specific publication's aims.

People who have achieved a high degree of cognitive sophistication in one domain may make use of relatively simple cognitive strategies in other areas or may resort to such strategies when taken out of contexts with which they are familiar.

In turn, Panikkar could criticize Boff for not taking seriously enough the religious diversity of the Brazilian context, and for promoting a rather superficial inclusion of other religions (like Candomblé) instead of a dialogue in the deep, thus remaining largely within Western moulds of thinking.64 From these contrasting positions could result, in the best case, a fruitful dialogue, in the worst case plain rejection.

Along with many other researchers in the field, Gould's works were sometimes deliberately taken out of context by creationists as «proof» that scientists no longer understood how organisms evolved.

With turning the other cheek, my take (again rightly or wrongly) is in the context of Roman occupation and it being an act of active resistance, using laws that exist against in this case a Roman that would slap a Jew in the face.

They often take scientific literature out of context or extrapolate information from studies that focus on other populations.

Hybridity, not only of those seeking conversion, but also of other people, also includes another element, which must be taken note of, especially in a pluralistic context where one is discussing conversion.

- If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.