Sentences with phrase «other court rules»

They should be applied consistently with constitutional requirements, statutes, other court rules and decisional law, and in the context of all relevant circumstances.

The personal representative is responsible for all court dates, filing deadlines, and other court rules.

Not exact matches

At some point, I suspect the Supreme Court will need to rule on which right trumps the other — religious freedom or freedom to wed..

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.

In a court ruling authorizing the arrests, Brazilian federal judge André Duszczak said «Faria and other BRF officers sought to cover up claims of possible food contamination, as shown in certain laboratory tests, made by a former employee in a labor lawsuit.»

In so ruling, the court nonetheless recognized a significant distinction regarding the CFTC's regulatory authority over derivatives markets on the one hand and over cash or spot transactions on the other.

The market is set to expand, too, after the Supreme Court ruled earlier this month that medical marijuana can be consumed in forms other than the dried leaf variety, opening the door to cannabis oils, teas, brownies, juices, and just about anything else.

Nevada and a few others states are the only ones permitted to take sports bets, but a major Supreme Court ruling could upend that dynamic.

Mark Pincus, the founder of video game company Zynga Inc, must face a lawsuit alleging he unfairly benefited by selling $ 192 million of stock in 2012 when other early investors were under a lockup agreement, according to a court ruling.

At the very least, controversial emails or other communications from high - profile or powerful people that are disclosed publicly — no matter how they are obtained — are considered in the court of public opinion where no rules of admissibility apply.

Circuit Court Judge Pamela Campbell has ruled that only the jury may see it, and not others in the courtroom or watching online.

However, Laila Mintas of Sportradar — the official data partner of the NFL, NBA, and NHL among other leagues — also envisions that with a favorable Supreme Court ruling, golf organization will see the same benefits as the other North American sports leagues.

LEIPZIG, Germany, Feb 27 - German cities can ban the most heavily polluting diesel cars from their streets, a court ruled on Tuesday, a move likely to be mirrored in other parts of Europe and to force automakers to pay to improve exhaust systems or switch to cleaner vehicles.

One other possible wrinkle that could impact the rule's implementation, meanwhile, is a pending legal challenge in a federal court in Texas.

A U.S. district court judge ruled that Marvel Comics — purchased by Disney in 2009 — will retain rights to those heroes and Kirby's many other creations.

The rules, which were upheld by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals earlier in June, ensure that internet service providers treat data equally and can not give or sell access to so - called internet fast lanes that would prioritize certain internet services over others.

The football team's owner is still awaiting the appeal from an other appeals court, which is not bound by the Washington ruling.

Similar legislation, which has arisen in response to federal court rulings allowing same - sex marriage in the 36 states, is pending in about 16 other states.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a startup Internet company has to pay broadcasters when it takes television programs from the airwaves and allows subscribers to watch them on smartphones and other portable devices.

Asked if he agreed with this, Sessions said he was not familiar how other courts have interpreted the 9th Circuit's ruling or the congressional prohibition.

Florida officials made a similar ruling in May, while courts in five other states classified drivers as contract employees.

In December 2011, the Supreme Court ruled that oversight of stock exchanges and other financial markets falls under the jurisdictional control of the provinces.

In 2014, Europe's highest court ruled that people had the «right to be forgotten» online, meaning they could ask Google and other digital companies to delete search results about them.

The ruling, filed on Tuesday in state court in San Francisco, was the latest in a host of legal and regulatory challenges facing Uber and other highly valued startups in the United States and other countries.

Other «backstops,» Hauptman said, could be a court - granted preliminary injunction, as well as a string of bills offering «technical» fixes to the rule, «like what we've seen in the Dodd - Frank context... to chip away and open a loophole in the rule.»

Other «backstops,» Hauptman said, could be a court granting a preliminary injunction, as well as a string of bills offering «technical» fixes to the rule, «like what we've seen in the Dodd - Frank context... to chip away and open a loophole in the rule.»

In the event that we are not able to resolve a dispute, we each agree that any and all disputes, controversies, or claims arising under, arising out of, or relating in any way to this agreement, or the contractual relationship established by this agreement (whether in contract, tort, or under any statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other source of law) shall be resolved on an individual basis through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's rules for arbitration of consumer - related disputes (accessible at https://www.adr.org/aaa/faces/rules)(except that you may assert individual claims in small claims court, if your claims qualify).

«The Movants have had ample opportunity to intervene in the multiple cases challenging the so - called «Fiduciary Rule» in district courts around the country, in appeals in two other circuits courts, and in this appeal, which was decided by this Court more than a month ago,» the filing said.

The Court ruling was made clear following a complaint by a Swedish entrepreneur wanting to provide a service on a Bitcoin exchange which involved other traditional currencies.

Ever since the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other trade groups began filing lawsuits to overturn the Labor Department's fiduciary rule in 2016, legal experts have speculated the issue would ultimately find its way to the Supreme Court.

In addition to tossing the rule, court has two other options: affirm the rule, or send it back to lower court on a minor issue.

To comply with the rules and regulations of our courts, the SEC, the IRS, and other regulatory agencies, you need an experienced, independent valuation firm.

Some industry critics say it too closely mimics the Department of Labor fiduciary rule that was struck down by the courts last week, while others say it doesn't go far enough.

However, the yields are high because the share prices are often depressed over concerns of particular court rulings, taxes imposed on cigarettes and other factors.

On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and therefore subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) anti-fraud and anti-manipulation enforcement authority.1 Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that «[u] ntil Congress clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other state and federal administrative agencies and civil and criminal courts over transactions in virtual currency.2

Kagan, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and the court's other liberals appeared likely to rule in Hawaii's favor.

They can't get a court to rule in their favor for that reason, so the government ends up favoring some people over others.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling on Friday, saying the family had not persuaded the three - judge panel «that the individual prayers or other remarks to be given by students at graduation are, in fact, school - sponsored.»

Many who hated Scalia's rulings could not help but be entertained by his razor - sharp writing, which he used especially in his dissenting opinions to carve up the majority's reasoning (my favorite is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where among other things he referred to the majority's «Nietzschean vision of us unelected, life - tenured judges — leading a Volk who will be «tested by following»» the Court's rulings obediently).

On other controversial questions, the court's rulings had produced initial furor and outrage, but the nation rather quickly accommodated itself to those decisions.

«Among the rulings,» says the report, «we find some that advise illegal actions and others that transgress human rights standards as applied by British courts.»

Like other retail corporations, Hobby Lobby was not affected by the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the individual mandate policy in June.

It was that ruling Jackson and others had appealed to the Supreme Court.

The appalling rule of the Romanovs, the grotesque privileges of the aristocrats, the obscurantism of the church, the harshness of the courts, the systematic attempts to wipe out other languages and cultures — none of that seems very encouraging.

Nonetheless, the Justices gravely declared that «the character of a nation of people who aspire to live according to the rule of law» is ultimately to be measured by the people's willingness to put aside their deeply held moral and religious views and accept the Court's pronouncements on this and other divisive questions.

On the other hand, evangelicals who promote a warped view of American history in an effort to undo the court rulings on church - state affairs ignore a fundamental point made by Roger Williams more than 300 years ago: «No civil state or country can be truly called Christian, although the Christians be in it.»

In 2001, in a decision that side - stepped the religious liberties issue, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled that he did not need to perform the ceremony because there were other civil servants who would.

Plus: European court rules against mandatory religious education, abortion politics in Sweden, and other stories from online sources around the world.

Recently, the Conseil d'Etat, France's highest administrative court, issued a pair of rulings on the question, one in a case from Paris and the other in a case from Nantes.

The court does not have the power to force Italy to take down the representations of Jesus on the cross, but if its ruling stands and Italy does not comply, the door would be open for others to sue on the same grounds, court spokesman Stefano Piedimonte told CNN.