Sentences with phrase «other court users»

So the plans are ill - thought through — not just for the impact on diversity but on all other court users.

In addition, they indicate a frustration which may be shared with other court users.

Judicial humour which demonstrates that the arguments of litigants, criminal defendants, lawyers or other court users have been «heard and considered» is likely to promote the feeling that procedural justice has been afforded to them.

The Court of Appeal made clear that although the loss of a half - day hearing might not be as serious as losing a trial date, it was still serious because it impacted upon other court users and was a significant factor which weighed against the granting of relief.

Carelessness can have grave consequences on other court users through loss of trial dates, cluttering of the judicial diary — NB every case is fact specific, in terms of the judicial perception of a party's conduct; weak excuses of the type «I didn't mean to become non-compliant» may be the subject of stringent criticism.

Other court users are likely to echo this.

Not exact matches

We reserve the right to provide information to law enforcement personnel and other third parties to answer inquiries; to respond to legal process; to respond to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction and those exercising the court's authority; and, to protect us and our users.

Other than to the extent ordered by a bankruptcy or other court, the use and disclosure of all transferred user information will be subject to this Privacy Policy, or to a new privacy policy if you are given notice of that new privacy policy and you affirmatively opt - in to accepOther than to the extent ordered by a bankruptcy or other court, the use and disclosure of all transferred user information will be subject to this Privacy Policy, or to a new privacy policy if you are given notice of that new privacy policy and you affirmatively opt - in to accepother court, the use and disclosure of all transferred user information will be subject to this Privacy Policy, or to a new privacy policy if you are given notice of that new privacy policy and you affirmatively opt - in to accept it.

To the extent permitted by law, we will disclose your information to government authorities or third parties if: (a) required to do so by law, or in response to a subpoena or court order; (b) we believe in our sole discretion that disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect against fraud, to protect the property or other rights of us or other users, third parties or the public at large; or (c) we believe that you have abused the Sites or the Applications by using them to attack other systems or to gain unauthorized access to any other system, to engage in spamming or otherwise to violate applicable laws.

- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.

«The se are the court users like, both of the Higher and Lower Benches, Lawyers, the Police, Prison Officers, UN-unconnected Donor agencies, Social Workers, Litigants, Legislators, Law Students and al other stakeholders in the justice sector.

We may disclose information about our users, including contact information, to respond to subpoenas, court orders, legal process, and other law enforcement measures, and to comply with other legal obligations, such as FCC requirements, in our sole judgment.

We may disclose your personal information with or without your knowledge or consent when we are permitted or required to do so by applicable law, government request or court order, or based on our good faith belief that it is necessary to do so in order to comply with such law, request or court order; to enforce or apply applicable terms and conditions and other agreements; or to protect the rights, property or safety of our organization, our supporters, other users, pets in the care of organizations that we work with, the public or others.

Court upholds the majority of vzbv's claims against Facebook: default privacy settings require users» informed consent, «real - name» clause and other -LSB-...]

Koch Media may also disclose personal data to law enforcement, or the appropriate civil authorities to enforce legal rights and comply with the law, or to comply with an order from a government entity or other competent authority, or when we have reason to believe that a disclosure is necessary to address potential or actual injury or interference with our rights, property, reputation, operations, users or others who may be harmed or may suffer loss or damage, or when we believe that disclosure is necessary to protect our rights, fraud protection and / or comply with a judicial proceeding, court order, or legal process served on Koch Media.

For example, Judges and their assistants could create and publish new «Court decisions», whereas other court staff could create other types of content — create content through an intuitive, friendly Graphical User Interface on the web site itCourt decisions», whereas other court staff could create other types of content — create content through an intuitive, friendly Graphical User Interface on the web site itcourt staff could create other types of content — create content through an intuitive, friendly Graphical User Interface on the web site itself.

While the Court acknowledged the difference between the tests, it found that official marks like any others serve an identification function, and it could not accept that the average Internet user would mistakenly think ICBCadvice.com referred to advice provided or endorsed by the Appellant.

Users simply select the specific federal court or other jurisdictions they wish to search by checking the appropriate box (see below).

It gives «extra credit» to sites that are geared toward the public, as opposed to attorneys or other regular users of court services.

The kiosk, which is 70 miles from the county courthouse and on the other side of the Grand Canyon, allows users to access the county's courtrooms to make remote court appearances, pay fines, get forms, and file documents.

If «the broad and general right to be secure from unreasonable search and seizure guaranteed by s. 8 is meant to keep pace with technological development», then courts must recognize that SMS technology, in which messages may be said to be «sent», «received», and «transmitted» between devices, is just one means of text messaging among many and is, from the point of view of the user, functionally identical to numerous others.

I suppose there could be interesting questions if the Twitter user was not in the jurisdiction of the court, depending on (among other things) whether the rules of practice permit service out of the jurisdiction without prior leave of the court.

This requirement can be satisfied either by adducing direct evidence or by asking the court to draw an inference based on, notably, whether the link was user - activated or automatic; whether it was a deep or a shallow link; whether the page contained more than one hyperlink and, if so, where the impugned link was located in relation to others; the context in which the link was presented to users; the number of hits on the page containing the hyperlink; the number of hits on the page containing the linked information (both before and after the page containing the link was posted); whether access to the Web sites in question was general or restricted; whether changes were made to the linked information and, if so, how they correlate with the number of hits on the page containing that information; and evidence concerning the behaviour of Internet users.

Some combination of more features (i.e.store PDFs of cases within Lexbox, annotate and create notes for yourself on cases, or automatically compile books of authorities based on saved items in a folder autoformated to your jurisdiction / court's prescribed format), more storage (i.e. save 20 items a month at the free level, but pay for unlimited), team / enterprise integration and features (i.e. share common folders and / or annotations and notes firm - wide based on # user licence), more productivity tool integration (Dropbox, Clio, Evernote, Hootsuite, etc.), and other database integration (WestlawNext, HeinOnline, Quicklaw, etc.) could be unlocked with a subscription.

In other words, at the time that the court is assessing the privacy interest on a Norwich application, it does not know whether the targeted individual is part of the class of innocent Internet users or the class of unlawful Internet users.

After applying the confusion criteria under Canadian law the Court considered factors such as the existence of other users of SCREAMING EAGLE clothing in the market but found «For all HARLEY - DAVIDSON riders and customers SCREAMIN» EAGLE is only associated with HARLEY - DAVIDSON and no other brand».

Law Genius allows individual users to upload court decisions and statutes, or any other type of text for that matter.

Other: Adrienne is a supervisor and works closely with our trainee solicitors during their training contracts.She is also a member of the user group at Highbury Corner Magistrates Court.

These evaluations are typically based on surveys of attorneys, other judges, court staff, and court users; courtroom observation for trial judges; written opinion review for appellate judges; and case - processing statistics.

Other tips caution companies not to ignore the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA, which can insulate them from liability down the line, or keeping data forever to avoid being compelled to give up user information when subpoenaed by the court.

An application that can capture discrete audio for translation or other purposes for victims and users of the court system.

In a number of other states, bar associations conduct polls of the most frequent court users — attorneys — about judges on the ballot (and in states with partisan and nonpartisan elections, their challengers) and share that and additional information with voters.

In partnership with experts from Stanford Law School's Legal Design Lab, Northeastern School of Law's NuLawLab, and the University of Maine School of Law, the Court Compass project is employing a number of human - centered design tools, including in - person design sprints and other focus groups to test new processes and solutions in real time and refine them based on user feedback.

The Electronic Court Filing Technical Committee will develop specifications for the use of XML to create legal documents and to transmit legal documents from an attorney, party or self - represented litigant to a court, from a court to an attorney, party or self - represented litigant or to another court, and from an attorney or other user to another attorney or other user of legal documCourt Filing Technical Committee will develop specifications for the use of XML to create legal documents and to transmit legal documents from an attorney, party or self - represented litigant to a court, from a court to an attorney, party or self - represented litigant or to another court, and from an attorney or other user to another attorney or other user of legal documcourt, from a court to an attorney, party or self - represented litigant or to another court, and from an attorney or other user to another attorney or other user of legal documcourt to an attorney, party or self - represented litigant or to another court, and from an attorney or other user to another attorney or other user of legal documcourt, and from an attorney or other user to another attorney or other user of legal documents.

I can certainly see the sense in the SCC relying only on their own resources, although other archiving organizations (and there are plenty of courts among them) must rather appreciate that Perma.cc is a free tool (for qualified users) that hosts and enables archives using not just PDF snapshots, but code - based captures (which preserve more of the dynamic content of a website) in addition to graphical screenshots (PNG images).

In addition to the other ADA accommodations that are available to all court users, in appropriate situations court clerks may assist a disabled self - represented litigant by completing court forms if the litigant's disability limits his / her ability to do this task on his / her own.

Therefore, in accordance with the terms of our privacy statement we will not disclose to any third party for any reason either the contents of or any facts relating to the contents of a user's email or any other communication a user sends to us; provided, however, such disclosure will be made when required to do so by law or by properly issued court order or when good - faith belief exists that such action is legally necessary to: (1) comply with the law or comply with legal process served on California Legal Research, Inc.; (2) protect and defend the legitimate business interests, rights or property of California Legal Research, Inc., its users, customers, or affiliates; or (3) act in an emergency to protect the personal safety of CALRI.com users or the public.

Developed by CALI, in association with Chicago - Kent College of Law, this freely available tool permits the creation by legal aid attorneys, courts other of «self - guided A2J interviews for use by unrepresented litigants and others in need -LSB-... that] walk users through a step - by - step question and answer process, which, in the end, creates an (often otherwise confusing) legal form.»

The UKSC / JCPC User Group, which represents professional users of the Court, has asked whether this option can be extended to advocates in other cases.

When you register to take GetDefensive.com's City of Houston Municipal Court # 5 Harris online defensive driving / driver safety / insurance reduction course, your credit card number and other personal information you provide is protected by SSL encryption to prevent access from any possible unauthorized users.

Access to and use of this website is subject to and governed by the laws of India and the Courts in Bangalore, India shall have exclusive jurisdiction in relation to any matter that may arise in relation thereto User's access of this website is at their own risk and the User shall be responsible for compliance with any other laws to which the User may be subject.

User information may be disclosed to government authorities or other third parties when required or permitted by law, including, but not limited to, in response to court orders and subpoenas.

«The Court notes also that, on devices other than Windows based PCs, competing operators of Microsoft have sufficiently large market shares to constitute communication networks whose level of use and attractiveness for users are at least comparable to those of Skype and Microsoft, taken together.»

Several days ago, the blogger Phil Wolff, on Skype Journal, went through a series of hypothetical remedies that the courts could have required of Microsoft, covering areas like interoperability but also other areas of consumer rights, such as the fact that Skype in its terms of service apparently doesn't allow users to file class action lawsuits against the company.

A non-binding legal opinion put out today by an influential advisor to Europe's top court has ruled that the social network can in fact be subject to privacy oversight in other European Union Member States — at least where it has some physical presence (such as a sales office), as well as users whose data it is gathering for targeted advertising.

Lauren Price of Maryland sued the companies in federal court in San Jose, where Facebook is based, on behalf of other U.S. Facebook users whose data Cambridge Analytica obtained.

Avenues for meaningful legal redress start with (1) clear, public, and unambiguous commitments that, if breached, would subject social media platforms to unfair advertising, competition, or other legal claims with real remedies; and (2) elimination of tricky terms - of - service provisions that make it impossible for a user to ever hold the service accountable in court.

Schrems started the legal proceeding against Facebook Ireland Ltd. in Austrian court and used so - called «Austrian style class action'to allow other users to join the claim on a pro bono basis.

The first of the two class actions launched against Coinbase came on Thursday courtesy of lead plaintiff Jeffrey Berk, who, in an eighteen - page complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleged that Coinbase staff (and possibly others) partook in insider trading with regards to its Bitcoin Cash (BCH) listing; forcing Coinbase users to forgo «any opportunity to buy at a fair price» across the three - day window spanning December 19 through December 21.

This means, for example, that Simply Hired may honor subpoenas, search warrants, law enforcement or court - mandated requests to reveal a user's electronic address and identity, or other properly requested information.