Sentences with phrase «other crash ratings»
The other crash ratings for all those vehicles are five - star.
http://www.automobilemag.com/ Not exact matches
Tesla also went on to cite stats from the government showing Autopilot reduced crash rates by 40 percent, and suffered far fewer fatalities per mile than other cars.
«This is a concerning rate,» Dedrone CEO Jorg Lamprecht told CNBC, «especially in light of international incidents where drones have crashed into other aircraft, and been used by terrorists, and used in other illicit activities.»
And trucks have a crash rate 28 percent lower than that of any other vehicles.
What's more, he says, other studies have linked these behaviors to an increased rate of crashes.
Your mileage will vary depending on how you drive and maintain your vehicle, driving conditions and other factors.Reviews: * Diverse four - engine lineup includes two powerful and efficient turbocharged V6 choices; significant aluminum body weight savings enables higher payload and tow ratings; highly focused Raptor off - road model; long list of available comfort, convenience and safety technologies; best - in - class crash - test scores.
The seven - passenger Volvo XC90 features excellent crash safety ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the NHTSA, but it doesn't offer the same level of active safety gear that you might find on other Volvo models (although there is a blind spot warning system that was available with the SUV).
The GT350 hasn't been crash tested, but other coupe Mustangs have, and scored 5/5 stars from the NHTSA and predominantly best - available ratings of Good from the IIHS.
Safety on the other hand is no problem, and the cabriolet boasts a five - star Euro NCAP crash test rating.
«Other minivans have earned good front and side ratings, but they haven't achieved a satisfactory level of rear crash protection.
The new Ford F - 150 SuperCab truck has won the prominent Top Safety Award from the IIHS above all other reviewed trucks earning the highest rating in front crash test!
HLDI studies of insurance losses have shown that rearview cameras and rear parking sensors reduce claim rates for damage to other vehicles (see «Rearview cameras reduce police - reported backing crashes,» Nov. 17, 2016).
Kia Motors Australia COO, Damien Meredith, said: «At no stage was there any suggestion that the physical crash safety of any Stinger model was less than any other grade, however the absence of some technology on the entry - level cars led to a split rating.
A 2008 Institute analysis of insurance claims found that, all other factors being the same, drivers of vehicles with seat / head restraint combinations rated good in Institute evaluations were 15 percent less likely to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashes than drivers of vehicles with poor head restraints (see «Neck injury risk is lower if seats and head restraints are rated good,» March 15, 2008).
The other 8 models are rated marginal or poor for rear crash protection.
Combined with reinforced metal within side panels and other key parts, the 2016 F - 150 proudly earned the 5 - Star overall crash test rating from the NHTSA.
The other two mid-sized crossovers rate well for reliability and crash performance.
The sixth large sedan tested is the Ford Taurus, which like the Impala, earns good ratings in the other crashworthiness tests but an acceptable rating in the small overlap front crash test.
Rollovers have a higher fatality rate than other kinds of crashes.
The Mercedes - Benz E-Class was completely redesigned for 2017 and offers two different front crash prevention systems — one standard and the other optional — with both earning superior ratings.
The Toyota Prius earned a «good» rating in four other crash tests.
Spokesman Eric Maybe said the Fiat 500 meets all government safety requirements and, like the Fit, gets «good» ratings in all four of the institute's other crash tests.
The award is given to vehicles with a good or acceptable small overlap rating, good ratings in four other occupant protection tests, and a rating of basic or higher for front crash prevention.
A 2008 Institute analysis of insurance claims found that, all other factors being the same, drivers of vehicles with seat / head restraint combinations rated good in Institute evaluations were 15 percent less likely to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashes than drivers of vehicles with poor head restraints.
Two other studies that attempted to determine if Google's vehicles had lower crash rates than conventional vehicles found mixed results.
On the one hand, it's very safe and carries a full five - star Euro NCAP crash - test rating, but on the other hand, our Driver Power customer satisfaction rating for the car is — possibly — quite poor.
Camry and Accord with side airbags rated good, Malibu acceptable; 10 other midsize cars rated poor in tests simulating crash with SUV
The Escape has earned the highest 5 - star overall NCAP ratings in the U.S., Europe, China and Australia and a «good» rating in all other IIHS crash test modes.
The analysis controlled for driver age, gender, insurance risk level and other factors that could affect the rates of crashes per insured vehicle year.
Controlling for other factors that can affect crash risk, blind spot detection lowers the rate of all lane - change crashes by 14 percent and the rate of lane - change crashes with injuries by 23 percent.
Among other types of crash avoidance systems, use rates were 90 percent or higher.
Controlling for differences in vehicle weight, driver age and gender, and other factors, the researchers found that drivers of vehicles with good ratings were about 46 percent less likely to die in frontal crashes than drivers of the poor - rated vehicles they crashed into.
A five star rating doesn't make a car invincible, it just signifies that it passes rigorous crash tests better than most other cars.
Diminutive as it is, the CX - 3 does just as well as every other SUV on this list, with a five - star overall NHTSA rating and best - possible scores in all of the IIHS» crash tests, plus it gets a Top Safety Pick Plus rating when equipped with the optional collision - mitigation system and upgraded headlights.
-- Chevrolet Sail gets 0 stars in Latin NCAP crash testing — The Sail sedan lacked airbags and 3 - point seat belts in all positions — GM may phase out cars without airbags and other safety features by 2019 — Other car manufacturers like Nissan, Renault and Fiat also have 0 star safety ratings for few car mother safety features by 2019 — Other car manufacturers like Nissan, Renault and Fiat also have 0 star safety ratings for few car mOther car manufacturers like Nissan, Renault and Fiat also have 0 star safety ratings for few car models
The award is given to vehicles with a good or acceptable small overlap rating, good ratings in four other occupant protection tests, and a rating of basic or higher for front crash prevention -
Several GM models have achieved zero or one star ratings in Latin NCAP crash testing, with many more from other key manufacturers receiving similarly dismal results.
If deployed, these airbags are capable of being inflated at different rates depending on crash severity, seatbelt usage and other factors.
Like the other two entries already mentioned, the Bolt doesn't have any official crash test ratings from the NHTSA or IIHS posted online.
The Sonata earns an acceptable rating in the small overlap front crash test, earns good ratings in each of the Institute's other four tests and offers an optional forward collision warning system.
The headlights that come standard on other Q70s are rated acceptable, but consumers can't get these headlights with the superior - rated front crash prevention system.
The i3 earns good ratings in the other crashworthiness tests and is available with an optional front crash prevention system that earns an advanced rating.
The Institute introduced the Plus award in 2012 to recognize models that achieve «good» or «acceptable» performance in the small - overlap test as well as «good» ratings in each of four other criteria — moderate overlap front crash, side impact and rollover tests, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
«The side structure of the Fusion held up reasonably well in the crash test, and this car's structural rating of acceptable is better than some other midsize models we've tested,» Lund points out.
The Ford Fusion / Mercury Milan is among only two current midsize car designs (the other is the Dodge Stratus / Chrysler Sebring) that don't earn the highest rating of good in the Institute's frontal offset crash test.
Seat / head restraint designs in 22 current car models are rated good for rear crash protection, but those in 53 other cars are rated marginal or poor.
Other new features include auto door - locking and an electric park brake, and all models now feature Smart City Brake Support autonomous emergency braking in forward and reverse gears (SCBS F / R) as standard, and Mazda expects a five - star ANCAP crash rating.
This van has a lot of nice features - a lot of features that will keep you coming in for service of intermittent problems Also, the van w swivel seats is not crash test rated, but others are 5 star.
Top winners must earn an acceptable or good rating in the challenging, small, overlap front crash test, and «good» ratings in all other categories.
Previous installments have focused on other IIHS tests, crash test dummies, the propulsion system used to power crash tests and the Institute's booster seat rating program.