Sentences with phrase «other critics seem»

Other critics seem to contradict themselves by pointing out a lot of good points about Aliens vs Predator, only to give it a really low score based on a couple of faults.

Other critics seem to contradict themselves by pointing out a lot of good points about Aliens vs Predator, only to give it a really low score based on a couple of

Most other critics seem to strongly prefer the Audrey half (which features some of the most quietly impressive F / X work I've ever seen) to the Gary half, but to my mind, they complement each other perfectly — so perfectly, in fact, that the denouement that formally brings them together is unnecessary.

Other critics seem to contradict themselves by pointing out a lot of good points about Aliens vs Predator, only to give it a really low score based on a couple of

Not exact matches

Asked by Maclean's about other speculation published over the years regarding his orientation, Kenney replied: «My life is a lot more boring than some of my critics seem to imagine.»

, 47, and passim).7 In short, it seems to me that Hall, like Ellul and a number of other modern philosophers of technology, has accepted an image of technology not as it is but as certain of its practitioners would like it to be (and as many of its critics fear it is): as an embodiment of pure abstract rationality.

To such critics, no answer we give, no verse we quote, no explanation we provide can ever do away with the fact that Christianity seems to worship a bloodthirsty deity who required the death of others in order to forgive sins and cleanse people of their iniquity.

And existing blogs such as Political Gastronomica and Blog P.I. have been weighing in ever since the first ’08 exploratory committee sites were launched, with the folks at the Bivings Report seeming to build a second career as online campaign critics (they're very good at aggregating the reviews of others as well).

The strange, self - interested, hermetically - sealed national debate we have been having - one in which the interests of other countries are treated as meaningless and the concerns of critics are treated like blasphemy - seems to extend to the formal economic documents the government is publishing.

What critics like English linguist Geoffrey Sampson, author of Educating Eve: The «Language Instinct» Debate, seem to find most irksome is Pinker's wholehearted promotion of a linguistic model that views the human capacity for learning language as distinct from other abilities, such as building bridges or writing symphonies.

The White House's abrupt move seems to be a response to renewed lobbying by gain - of - function critics who wanted such work suspended and others who sought to evaluate its risks and benefits without disrupting existing research.

While the study can't prove that one is related to the other, the findings would seem to support what critics have long said: Smoking by glamorous (or even not - so - glamorous) people on the silver screen is like free advertising for cigarettes.

The critics seem to have badly misjudged this great story, they're clearly idiots or lacking passion and a sense of adventure - maybe a result of watching too many crappy Hollywood action movies or bias towards Bay who has his name «over the door» even though its run and written by others.

I was once a very harsh critic of Mr. Tarantino, the video store clerk turned auteur, who seemed to be preoccupied with the inventiveness of his in - jokes and visual quotations of scene compositions from other films.

Another admirable trait that seems to be forgotten with other critics is that he knew out to review a movie in context.

Or maybe it's because she's married to Lou that she can't stop thinking of Daniel... Following up «Away from Her,» Polley's second film is sharply dividing critics and audience in Toronto: Many find it simultaneously exhilarating and depressing; others find it ugly and hateful; a third faction seems to be kicking against the film not for how it says what it says, but, instead, for what it says in the first place.

However, I've yet to hear much personal discussion on it from anyone other than the critics and it would seem that Farhadi has still some way to go before he gets the recognition he deserves among your average film enthusiast.

The good old days when audiences, critics and filmmakers were divided by spirited debates and stood their ground openly attacking each other seem to be confined to a bygone era of economic prosperity.

Lacking the usual filter between his brain and his mouth, Montana lets fly with stream - of - consciousness invective and profane one - liners that might seem de rigueur in an era where every other screen thug takes charm lessons from Quentin Tarantino, but were derided as scandalous by establishment critics on the film's release.

Ultimately, I'm scoring Arthur fairly low compared to other critics, as the one - joke nature of it, and some all - too obvious contrivances, does make it seem like a more ordinary comedy than many critics give it credit for.

Critics seemed pretty divided on it as Roger Ebert gave it two out of fours stars, while others ranked it among the ten best of the year.

For a long while, the genre — whether Marvel - or DC - derived — seemed to have ossified into a matter of, as critic Matt Zoller Seitz concisely put it, «things crashing into other things (and) people smashing each other into buildings.»

I have to believe you had all your family members write concuring your terrible review, as everyone I seen in a very Large theatre seem to love it, I am sure movies like YA YA Sister hood and other slower paced films will still be made for folks like you, its just a shame that someone so out of touch with what the «public» likes is getting paid to review movies.Your like the George bush of Movie critics.

Also, I don't fully agree with the remarks that a critics group is being lazy for awarding the film that seems to be winning the top award from most of the other groups.

The Chrysler Sebring, adorned with a ribbed hood and other cues from the Crossfire, had better specs on paper than the older Sebrings; but buyers and critics didn't seem to think as much of the actual car as its predecessor.

Playful in tone and less reliant upon the exploitative construct of the case - study scenario in such large scale video projects as Them, 2007, and Repetition, 2005, Artur Zmijewski's earlier videos stand in contrast to these somewhat over-determined provocations; while recent Zmijewski productions have adopted a nearly formulaic approach to positioning cultural difference and conflict, and thereby seem to codify the subject as «other» a priori — a risk that critic and art historian Hal Foster has insightfully called the «self - othering» of «the artist as ethnographer» — three earlier Zmijewski works engage a simpler, more agile approach.

She exposes it as being as manipulative as any other artistic medium, as the critic Roberta Smith pointed out when the Centerfolds made their debut in 1981: «The psychological weight of the work is so direct that at times it seems to free the viewer to see very clearly the formal manipulations which are at its source.

It seems to me that many have predicted what we are now seeing: As the position of the warmistas begins to become ever more untenable, there will be a variety of reactions, with some increasing the drumbeat of doom and becoming ever more shrill, attempts were made to completely silence critics of the True Faith by Any Means Necessary, some others backtracking and staking out a position on the fence, while still others fled like rats from a sinking ship.

Christie's critics, on the other hand, seem to accept that once it can be shown that human activity may be having potentially negative environmental effects, this alone justifies government intervention.

The authors of these papers are vocal in public (and private emails) as are critics outside the domain of climate science, but other observers from within climate science seem to be mostly silent.

If the Anon is the same here as in other threads, I'll note that I'm not particularly one of the «scam bloggers» you seem to imagine in your head to be the only critics of legal academia.

Besides critics of these statutory interpretation concepts, there are other rules of interpretation, which seem contrary to these «closed book» rules, such as the ability of a court to «read - in» words or phrases to a statute to ensure its constitutional integrity.

Among other things, I argue, it is not at all apparent that changing the terms on which we permit the use of lethal force will achieve the goals IHL's current critics seem to seek.