Sentences with phrase «other critiques of»

There are other critiques of the CAPE ratio in circulation.

This also includes the other critiques of Chetty's work, not mentioned whatsoever in this piece albeit very important to understanding it (see, for example, here, here, here, and here).

Andy readily admits that he's still stuck on denial, and from there he raises a big question that we've heard in other critiques of the report: Can we really trust the measures of teacher performance we used to reach our conclusions about professional development?

Not exact matches

Coursera and other MOOC providers have been widely critiqued for their low completion rates and the caliber of the education they offer.

However, other witnesses at the hearing critiqued certain aspects of how the law has been implemented.

Rather than fearing feedback and defending any critiques, try to be curious of how others view your performance.

According to Buffer Social, these symbols aren't just silly, they can do everything from soften the blow of a critique to make the person on the other end seem more human.

Also, the critique deals only with the specific promotion you have hired me to review; it does not include discussion or analysis of other promotions for the same product or service.

JULY 11, 2011: Twenty - something CTV Quebec City bureau chief Kai Nagata's public note of resignation, critiquing the limitations of television news to facilitate change, goes super viral, reprinted on The Tyee among other places.

Copy Critiques: In these one - hour sessions, we go over a sales letter, or a video sales letter script, or a webinar script, or a magazine or newspaper ad... or just about any other kind of copy you'd like to get the best sales results from.

Neither gentleman is a «yes man», and both seem totally comfortable critiquing and questioning the assumptions of the other.

I am familiar with critiques of the «ideology of competitiveness» but have little knowledge of the questions currently being raised by CLASSE or others.

Yet the statement drew some swift critiques given that, in recent days, a number of accounts — including the support team for cryptocurrency exchange Kraken — reported that they had seen their accounts restricted despite trying to warn others about copycat accounts that mimic well - known industry members.

The other candidates either tried to co-opt the tone though not the substance of Paul's Fed bashing (Gingrich and Perry did this) or just stayed out of Paul's way as much as possible on the issue without affirming Paul's critique (Romney.)

Whether the critiques provided are correct or wrong, religious TV and media gives us the opportunity to reflect on our way of life and talk with others about religion.

I ask this for three reasons: 1) Warfield begins the chapter with Edward Gibbon's conversion to Catholicism, which was related to Gibbon's belief in the continuation of the miraculous; 2) he spends several pages in the same chapter critiquing another famous convert to Catholicism, John Henry Newman, noting what he sees as Newman's shift toward the miraculous; 3) even though he knows that Gregory of Nyssa, Athanasius, and Jerome all wrote about saints in which the miraculous was prominent, he still makes the claim that these «saints» lives» follow other Christian romances and thus represent an infusion of Heathenism into the church.

In these moments, as we are faced with the choice of whether to release the narratives we have built to others or to simply forget them, there is one question that we must ask ourselves: Am I complaining or am I critiquing?

The general idea is that some elements in the hierarchical field are abstract enough to be included in a formal category of relationships that applies to other events in other durations and that such applications may be formally derived and analyzed without prejudice to the critique of narrative elements described previously.

The critique by a young freshman in the back row of the class can hold its own against the views of Richard Rorty, for the one no less than the other provides a fresh reading of the text.

Here's an excellent critique of what's wrong with Tony Jones» and others response from Wenatchee the Hatchet, a name given to an anonymous blogger who is without a doubt the # 1 source for insider dirt re MHC.

We must remember to do more than critique the work of others; we must help cultivate a kingdom counterculture where we live.

I have drawn plenty of cartoons critiquing Mark Driscoll's view of women, his theology, his abuses, his lame apologies, and other issues.

The socialist critique has been based on other grounds — specifically, the use of the productive resources which capitalism generates.

We can critique problems in the church without making martyrs out of those those who choose to use dysfunctional churches to victimize others.

Many parts of Finkelstein's critique of the contemporary Jewish world have been made before by other leftist Jews, for instance by Lenni Brenner in Jews in America Today (1986), while venomous anti «Zionism has been a stock «in «trade of the extreme left since the 1960s.

(c) Because these interests are socioculturally situated they are diversely concrete, threatening to fragment «understandings» of God, and they are open to the suspicion of ideological bias; but because they are interests in God the capacities they guide also require cultivation of capacities for conversation with other concrete understandings and capacities for critique of ideological self - deceptions.

I think that white feminist theology that seeks to examine class and race privilege well addresses critiques of womanists and other women - of - color feminists.

My critique of Disney is not so much concerned with the content of its films and other media, though the content is certainly open to criticism.

In two separate sections, Drs. Capek and Stearns agree and critique each other on their views of determinism as held by contemporary process philosophy.

When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?

If an epistemology of the cross were about no other task, its contribution to the critique of power - as - domination would justify its existence.

Barth's critique of the church here is more like that of Luther than that of Wycliff, Hus, Savanarola and other pre-reformers who protested vigorously against the abuses of the late medieval church.

These two critiques of development — the third World liberation perspective and the First World ecological perspective — soon appeared to be in considerable conflict with each other.

Feminism challenges the legitimacy of sex roles Along with other social movements, feminism is rooted in the critique that a society so constructed that certain people and groups profit from inequalities — between men and women, rich and poor, black and white, etc. — is a society in which money is more highly valued than love, justice, and human life itself.

I have changed it slightly to indicate that our goal is to critique both the primal and modern visions of human being and society in the light of each other and in the light of the theological vision of God's purpose for the future of humankind.

Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.

An eloquent critique of secular rationality as the only basis for a discussion of a republic's virtues is Kent Greenawalt's Religious Convictions and Political Choice (Oxford University Press, 1987), an appraisal of Bruce Ackerman, John Rawls and other philosophers.

Conversely, those who are «open and affirming» will characteristically maintain a critique of consumer capitalism, and consensus on a whole cluster of other issues.

Christians have the opportunity and the duty to critique these assumptions and offer others that seem more suitable in light of Christian faith.

Bishop Paulose concludes this discussion, «In this way we respond to Marx's critique of religion that Christianity is not the opium of the people but a way of life in which the Christian participates in Jesus» «being there for others», for the total humanization of humanity.»

Jürgen Moltmann, on the other hand, emphasized the difference between the new and the old meanings of political theology depicting what had earlier been called political theology as the ideology of political religion, which is the symbolic integration of the beliefs of a people through which they sanction and sanctify their traditions and their ambitions.12 Moltmann strongly supports Peterson in his critique of political theology in this sense.13 It is the task of what is properly called political theology — in Metz's sense — to unmask the pretenses of political religions.

In separate essays, Charles Hartshorne77 and Lewis Ford78 point out the serious misunderstandings of Whitehead at work in this critique, and Ford and others explain the Whiteheadian solution to the problem of evil as follows: 79 God does not wholly determine the course of the temporal process.

I appreciate Richard Bushman's attention to my article, but I'm afraid he leaves me with the most banal of author's responses: His critique seems to refer to some article other than the one I wrote.

This is similar to some of the other critiques I had.

Others, like myself, will decide to learn from his critique of the world view of modern science without wishing to become Whiteheadian organismic philosophers.

The result of this is that the «thinker» occupies an altogether unassailable position, from which he is able to discern and pronounce upon the limits of every other discourse (scientific, metaphysical, religious, cultural, or what have you), without himself being subject to critique from any other quarter.

By juxtaposing the concerns of Dawson and Eliot to the cultural criticism of the Frankfurt School and other social critics like Neil Postman, one can begin to see an emerging critique of the forms of modernity during the first half of the twentieth century.

That this postulated freedom is indeed freedom according to hope is, to my mind, what the other two postulates which frame it signify (following the order of the three parts of the Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason, which runs from rational psychology to rational cosmology and to rational theology).

Otherwise when individual black women try to seek healing and try to move away from the Strong Black Woman, they're very much critiqued by other black women who are still in the throes of that identity.

By resisting the colonization of theology by philosophy or any other discourse, Barth prefigured the postmodern critique of all universalizing or «totalizing» discourses.