I think Athanaius and
some other early church fathers viewed sin as corporate thing, as opposed to the individualistic understanding which has now developed.
This is how St. Atbanasius of Alexandra and some of
the other early church fathers explained the meaning of incarnation.
Like
other early church fathers, the author warns Christians against overemphasis on dress or cosmetics.
Not exact matches
the reminder that Orthodox theology continually refreshes its thinking by reference to the
early Church Fathers, who were much concerned with the question of God's activity in the
other sects and traditions and in the wisdom of humankind.
Just as St. Paul's letters gave
early Christian commentators examples of how to interpret the Old Testament in light of Christ, so the
Church Fathers stretch our exegetical imagination by showing how
other passages can be read in that way.
You are chasing a myth created by
early church fathers who constructed this story to attain some power and control of
others chief.
Ratzinger and
other like - minded scholars believed that aggiornamento needed to be combined with ressourcement - a «return to the sources» of Catholic theology in the Scriptures and in the
early Fathers of the
Church.
Nevertheless, the first and even the subsequent
early councils were not called at random but because there were people ---- like Arius, Sabellius, the Nestorians (though not Nestorius), and
others ---- who were teaching things about Jesus, the
Father, or the Holy Spirit that, so far as our evidence can tell us, were not being taught by the majority of the
Church.
I know that sometimes the sacraments are confusing but I do ask you to read the
other scriptures that support confession and writing of the
early church fathers.