The United Church of Canada, one third of it Presbyterian at its inauguration in 1925, at its 32nd General Council in l988, after much study and years of hot debate, made the kind of decision in the face of this issue that ought at least to be considered by
other ecclesial communities facing it.
Those who come from
other ecclesial communities and enter into full communion with the Catholic Church encounter great joy among some Catholics that they have, not to put too fine a point on it, «come over to our side.»
program, students can continue their contextual education through a variety of internships, including clinical pastoral education, campus ministry and Christian education, as well as in
other ecclesial settings in the U.S. and abroad.
Not exact matches
I thought according to what I have seen you say many times, the
other «
ecclesial communities» aren't true and do not follow god.
Patriarch Bartholomew's first move could be to normalize the canonical standing of the
ecclesial bodies that are presently not in communion with
other Orthodox Churches.
The subtlety of the Second Vatican Council's statement in Nostra Aetate that the «Catholic Church rejects nothing of what is true and holy in [
other] religions» has often been missed by Catholics on both sides of the
ecclesial aisle.
The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «
ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to
others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over
others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on
others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»
Many are in traditional parishes, though our definition of
ecclesial includes campus ministry and
other forms of ministry.
Some hold that numerous bishops have failed because of their complicity in corrupt
ecclesial structures, while
others believe that these leaders lacked the courage to teach unpopular truths and to govern their own dioceses.
The statement, published in the New York Times and several
other newspapers, was intended as «a thoughtful Jewish response» to the «dramatic and unprecedented shift» that has occurred in Jewish - Christian relations, not only through reformulation of Christian teachings but through explicit
ecclesial statements of remorse on the part of both Catholics and Protestants.
Preventing the former defect would require, among
other things, that we think more ecclesiologically and less politically and that we regard the
ecclesial order as more comprehensive than the political.
Now it takes little reflection to see that most major problems of
ecclesial and political controversy have always been and will continue to be divergent and not convergent ones; accordingly, there is an especially vexing irony in the fact that those who want to find a «mainstream» position on the Big Issues are almost always those who are committed on
other grounds to a pluralist or relativist stance in matters of public debate.
While conversions between
ecclesial traditions will always occur, the ecumenical movement is best served by those who combine a strong commitment to their own tradition with an openness toward
others.
Yet his vision for the church compels him to help
others with specifically
ecclesial gifts to raise up patches of nonviolent resistance to the war - making power of the state and to the tendency of churches to bless that power.
Not only did it recognize the
ecclesial reality of
other Christian churches, but it stated explicitly that «whatever is wrought by the grace of the Holy Spirit in the hearts of our separated brethren can contribute to our own edification.»
As for saying that these
other associations are
ecclesial communities rather than churches in the full sense — as, for instance, the «particular churches» of Orthodoxy are churches — this should cause no hard feelings.
Each of these
ecclesial traditions, among
others, has enriched my life and calling to serve the Body of Christ.
The St. John's Bible does much to bring together the Protestant's zeal in printing the text on one hand, and the Catholic care for
ecclesial art on the
other.
The Directory describes
other communities as «Churches and
Ecclesial Communities that are not in fall communion with the Catholic Church.»
She can not settle for understanding herself as one church among the churches in the way that
other churches and
ecclesial communities can and do understand themselves.
While I recall reading about the post-Schleiermacher tendency to understand practical theology as made up of numerous dimensions — the liturgical, moral, pastoral, spiritual,
ecclesial and catechetical — within a clerical paradigm, I experienced it as a number of nonintegrated, specific disciplines of ministerial studies separated from
other isolated disciplines dispersed throughout a confused theological curriculum.
By an opaque concept of revelation, 1 mean that familiar amalgamation of three levels of language in one form of traditional teaching about revelation: first, the level of the confession of faith where the lex credendi is not separated from the lex orandi; second, the level of
ecclesial dogma where a historic community interprets for itself and for
others the understanding of faith specific to its tradition; and third, the body of doctrines imposed by the magisterium as the rule of orthodoxy.
The grace of God has impelled members of many Churches and
ecclesial Communities, especially in the course of the present century, to strive to overcome the divisions inherited from the past and to build anew a communion of love by prayer, by repentance and by asking pardon of each
other for sins of disunity past and present, by meeting in practical forms of cooperation and in theological dialogue.
In the context of the life and work of
other religious traditions it is incumbent on the Church in India to evolve more open
ecclesial structures that do justice to its experience of an interrelatedness and mutual inclusiveness with
other religious traditions and their adherents.
It is very hard to see, however, how an
ecclesial tradition could provide «authoritative parameters» for Scripture exposition, if the Church's interpretative authority has no
other basis than the actual correctness of its interpretative decisions.
The Church in India is in a privileged position, because of its situation in the midst of
other religious traditions, to work out new
ecclesial structures which translate the vision of the Kingdom.
In
other words, contextual theology requires revision of the dominant understanding of the universal which is still very much marked by the
ecclesial praxis and attitudes of 19th century Europe.
This highly ambiguous notion has done a great deal of harm, and has all too often been used to pour scorn on anything that can be labelled simplistic, overly dependent on authority, or — that
other great bogey of today's Church — «fundamentalist,» which is usually a code word for anyone who believes the Gospel might actually be worth believing and acting on, especially if they belong to one of the new
ecclesial movements.
For some, that bridge led back to new chapters of old liberal theology, but for
others it led to the repair of
ecclesial division, and the renewal of theology in the university.
It is clear that the congregation's main fear with Boff is not Marxism (as it is with many
other liberation theologians) but his central emphasis on the Holy Spirit, which could challenge the validity of present
ecclesial structures.