Sentences with phrase «other economists do»

Unfortunately, Nordhaus and most other economists don't understand this alternative approach.

Other economists don't agree that you need $ 350,000 to be considered rich, however an amount of money that exceeds $ 200,000 per year is enough for a family to lead a more than comfortable lifestyle; this means having the chance to live in a big house, send the kids to private schools, have enough money to travel internationally, own at least 2 cars, and have no debt except a mortgage which will help them build equity.

Not exact matches

«You do have to see it in the wider context of all the other roles that are on offer,» James Nixon, chief European economist at Oxford Economics told CNBC Tuesday, about the appointment of Luis de Guindos.

Because they aren't responsible for collecting the taxes for these payments, «a provincial government and its voters are incited to always demand more from the centre, shifting a large part of the costs to the taxpayers of other provinces,» argues Université du Québec economist Pierre Lemieux.

I expect that more government officials who «know that they do not know» the answers for unlocking economic development will increasingly partner with the J - PAL and other economists to help them to experiment and learn.

To be a C.E.O. or other top executive, said Guy Berger, an economist at LinkedIn, «you need to understand how the different parts of a company work and how they interact with each other and understand how other people do their job, even if it's something you don't know well enough to do yourself.»

«Research that I and others have done suggests that Mexico has had a nice little income boost overall from NAFTA,» Gordon Hanson, a trade economist at UCLA, told me.

Notice the reason why I do it this way rather than the «normal» way most other economists would.

But on a more basic level, if communities and workers are being left behind, the question is: Why privilege trade over other policy levers — whether that means restricting it, as Trump wants to do, or expanding it, as many economists advocate?

Free - trade economists say these types of moves don't do much to protect workers, and anything that raises the price of steel hurts other American industries.

It has come to my attention that some economists claim that our sovereign federal government is more or less powerless to kickstart the economy because of our great dependence on the United States and therefore should do next to nothing: «Mr. Orr and other economists urged Ottawa to ignore pleas to boost stimulus spending further -LSB-...]

Neva Rockefeller Goodwin, a Tufts University economist and great granddaughter of the oil magnate, said she and other Rockefeller descendants were backing four shareholder resolutions and urging other investors to do the same.

When the central banks of other, and especially poorer, nations do this sort of thing, economists (including some who work for the Fed) refer to their policies, not as examples of enlightened monetary management, but as instances of financial repression.

Other economists say the recent explosion of incomes at the top did hurt everyone else, by concentrating economic and political power among a relatively small group.

In other words, oil price increases that economists and investors do not see coming spell trouble for global markets if left unchecked.

Explaining the relation between the Fed's creation (or destruction) of bank reserves and banks» creation (or destruction) of deposits takes a little effort, not in the least because doing so means confronting the different ways in which economists on one hand and bankers and banking consultants on the other look at the process, and deciding whether the difference is due to substantive disagreement, or mere semantics.

Not until Lawrence H. White's 1984 book Free Banking in Britain and George Selgin's 1988 Theory of Free Banking did economists confront these two powerful currents of thought directly with each other.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-29/give-marx-a-chance-to-save-the-world-economy-commentary-by-george-magnus.html Policy makers struggling to understand the barrage of financial panics, protests and other ills afflicting the world would do well to study the works of a long - dead economist: Karl Marx.

Political scientists, economists and other readers might quibble with these and other aspects of Küng's argument, and if they don't stop at quibbling, this is all to the good.

One university divinity school dean told me that he himself values the writing his faculty does for laypeople in the church, but tenure decisions are made by a universitywide committee, and chemists, economists and other scholars will dismiss more popular writing as «obviously not scholarship.»

Of course, many individual economists do care about how income is distributed on the basis of ideas about human beings derived from sources other than their discipline.

Thus, economist Walter E. Williams argues that «to get along with and serve one another doesn't require caring about each other.»

Really there is nothing I would do should Arsenal fail to win the League Cup other than to wonder WHY and WHY would an impressionable manager and coach and» football brand economist» suddenly takes on the sticker of bywords and gainsayers.

What do other economists and economic institutions have to say on the issue?

Tony Dolphin, chief economist at the Institute for Public Policy Research think - tank, agrees that politically speaking, Osborne will keep going because he doesn't believe he has any other choice.

Another theory is that people do it not merely because of the chance of changing the outcome of an election, but because it's an act of civic duty, although economist Steve Landsburg, in his popular book «The Armchair Economist», counters «But that ignores the fact that voting takes time away from other more productive acts of cieconomist Steve Landsburg, in his popular book «The Armchair Economist», counters «But that ignores the fact that voting takes time away from other more productive acts of ciEconomist», counters «But that ignores the fact that voting takes time away from other more productive acts of civic duty.

For that matter, what have the already hired lawyers and «chief economist» been doing so far... other than twiddling their thumbs and having nice lunches out and about in NYC?

The other half of the $ 1.4 million prize honors Oliver Williamson, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, for his analysis of how a company decides what to do or make for itself and what to buy from others.

Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist at Duke University, says the results fit with research by him and others on the idea that seemingly honest people are dishonest «only because of a kind of «wishful blindness,» when we don't pay attention to our thoughts.»

They have done this by taking advantage of university - based Title VI outreach programs or other teacher support programs, such as «The American Forum for Global Education,» participating in Fulbright seminars abroad programs, reading widely in international journals such as The Economist, and traveling on their own.

The film, which included interviews with Michelle Rhee, Bill Gates, and the economist Eric Hanushek, among others, made the central points that public education was failing, that resources don't matter, and that the best ways to fix the national crisis of low test scores were to expand the number of privately managed charters, fire ineffective teachers, and weaken the unions that protected them.

Flowers: «Long story, short: the CFR research has withstood criticism from Rothstein (a brilliant economist, whom CFR greatly respects), and their findings were backed up by other economists in the field (yes, some of them do have a «pro-VAM» bias, but such is social science).»

Amrein - Beardsley: Long story, short: the CFR research has [not] withstood criticism from Rothstein (a brilliant economist, whom CFR [and many others] greatly respect, and their findings were backed up by other economists [i.e., two to be exact] in the field (yes, some of them [only Chetty's buddy Kane] do have a «pro-VAM» bias, but such is social science).

But of course truth can be stranger than other things, and Neil Gaiman, in Neil Gaiman's Fantasy Painting — here in The Economist's Intelligent Life — doesn't have to embellish a single thing about the painter and writer Richard Dadd's life, 1817 - 1886.

News & Notes is a weekly Saturday post featuring book - and publishing - related news, links to interesting articles and opinion pieces, and other cool stuff Book News Economist Paul Krugman says «Amazon's Monopsony is Not O.K.» (New York Times) For an opposing view, read Matthew Yglesias's «Amazon is doing the world... Read more»

Do you know of any other brokerage that employs a full time economist?

How do economists track the prices of things like milk, produce, furniture and other retail products?

«Some segments of the demographic do tend to hold higher debt levels than others,» said Robert A. Dye, chief economist at Comerica Bank.

As most economists advise, this should be done with revenue neutral carbon taxes (and not cap and trade or other easily corrupted schemes).

Why do I have faith in economics when economists can't agree with each other?

If anyone wants to know what we can do to achieve energy independence without breaking the bank or harming our way of life, I and thousands of other scientists, engineers, and economists who have studied the issues will be glad to help.

Other business publications, like The Economist also get a lot of energy industry advertisements, as to general publications like Time, but do not have the same ideological filter on interpreting scientific results.

Neva Rockefeller Goodwin, a Tufts University economist and great granddaughter of the oil magnate, said she and other Rockefeller descendants were backing four shareholder resolutions and urging other investors to do the same.

A sixth, if you are still counting, is that governments don't like uncertainty: they search for the one - handed economist and adviser, the one who ignores the other possibilities and plumps for action.

* Economists do not know very much * Other people, including the politicians who make economic policy, know even less about economics than economists Economists do not know very much * Other people, including the politicians who make economic policy, know even less about economics than economists economists do.»

Hundreds of scientists, economists, and public policy experts are set to meet in Manhattan next month to discuss the other side of the climate change debate that the establishment media prefers to pretend does not exist.

The two have never debated directly — Ehrlich has always refused, saying that Simon is a «fringe character» — but they have lambasted each other in scholarly journal articles with titles like «An Economist in Wonderland» and «Paul Ehrlich Saying It Is So Doesn't Make It So.»

The other bureaucrats, engineers and economists do not know about equilibrium.

Economists and others have also done important work questioning whether climate risks justify extreme mitigation measures.

All of this is naturally unsatisfying and not what economists are used to doing, but in rare situations like climate change where DT [Dismal Theorem: price of future consumption, E [M λ] for λ, the lower bound on consumption, large] applies we may be deluding ourselves and others with misplaced concreteness if we think that we are able to deliver anything much more precise than this with even the biggest and most detailed climate - change IAMs as currently constructed and deployed.