Sentences with phrase «other end of the argument»

At the other end of the argument, many natural

Not exact matches

And then there was his argument with the other believers who were «of the Pharisees» that ended up in the council of Jerusalem.

At the end of the day I want us, no matter which way the argument may go, to be able to consider each other family still.

Indeed, in G. M. A. Grube's classic commentary, Plato» s Thought» as in a number of other accounts» a detailed summary of the Symposium ends with Socrates» argument; one would never learn from Grube that Alcibiades had entered at all.

The death of the Prophet [may God grant him Peace] hailed a new era in which Muslims would have to develop an open - ended system of interpretation for issues and precedents for which the Qur «an and Sunnah did not have explicit experience with!The other aspect of your argument is that you compact all unbelievers [kafiruwn] into the same box.

Today, an emerging grassroots preterist movement is finally taking notice of the correspondence between the New Testament's picture of «the end» and the events of the latter part of the first century, giving renewed weight to the arguments of Origen, Chrysostom, and other ancient fathers.

We might even grant, if only for the sake of argument, the pro-choicers» point that pro-lifers are not sufficiently attending to other legitimate issues, including those that might prompt a mother to end her pregnancy.

Whilst Max Verstappen's success makes a huge argument for youth, drivers like Alonso make a significant point from the other end of the F1 driver age spectrum.

The main stumbling block in the argument for Wilshere is his perceived lack of contribution at the other end of the pitch; assisting only twice and not scoring once during his 29 league appearances.

The ability to believe in the light at the end of the tunnel, even if you can't necessarily see it, will be so beneficial: You'll forever know that sleepless nights will pass, arguments will pass, and any other conceivably difficult parenting moment will, eventually, pass.

The other side of the argument is almost certainly doing the same thing, and at the end of the day the winner will be the one most successful at building trust in themselves and their argument.

The assemblyman did admit there's some merit to the argument from the other side that the $ 200,000 income threshold is inconsistent with the old $ 200,000 (for individuals) threshold of the millionaire's tax, which will remain in place through the end of the year.

One of the main arguments against a new law on assisted dying is that it would lead to vulnerable people being forced to end their lives against their will, by relatives or others who might have an ulterior motive.

As Steven Weinberg points out here, the argument made against extremists ends up invoking a moral sense to argue that the religious ideas of the extremists are wrong, when the whole point of religion is that it should be the other way around.

Although the Copenhagen conference could have been criticized on many fronts, it is hard to imagine that Palin's remarkable statement represents anything other than a misplaced religious end - of - days argument of the type that asserts confidence in human dominion over the earth — and that God will ensure the planet remains fine in the face of human progress, until God decides to end it all and the worthy ascend to heaven.

In other words, if climate sensitivity is toward the low end, 2 K is more dangerous than we currently give it credit for, and arguments for low risk because of low sensitivity are less valid because that means that more ecological changes occur for a given temperature change than currently thought.

The entire play takes place at the house of one of the couples, and throughout the evening they end up bickering with each other and getting into ridiculous arguments.

We'd be foolish not to give some sort of shout out to other terrific scenes throughout the year, like the hilarious funeral sequence in Li» l Quinquin, which had us doubled over from laughter; both the border crossing and night vision sequences in Sicario; the ending of Carol, which should get an emotional response out of even the coldest souls; the opening long take in Buzzard, a painfully funny experience much like Entertainment; the bonkers final act of Jauja; a scorching scene from The Fool where the town mayor lays into her corrupt staff; everything that happens at Mamie Claire's house in Mistress America; the intense argument between Gerard Depardieu and Jacqueline Bissett in Welcome to New York; the tightrope sequence in The Walk, and much, much more.

By the early 1960s, others on the opposite end of the political spectrum also were making the argument that vouchers were a viable alternative for getting around the bureaucracy and ineffectiveness of many public schools.

These tasks can include anything from: group work / conflict resolution sessions; having students undertake learning style and personal learning activities so that they understand their strengths / weaknesses in a group; using ICT tools to support collaboration (e.g. Google Drive or edmodo); explicit teaching of problem solving and critical thinking (argument mapping, pro / con activities, logic and reasoning tasks), peer and self - evaluation in group work; small group dynamic activities that require students to solve small problems collaboratively (and mirror the types of open ended questions and problems encountered in other subjects e.g. maths, humanities, English, science).

But in his announcement yesterday, Christie ended up sticking to his support of the Common Core and paying little heed to the polarizing arguments in other states over whether to drop out of Common Core and the PARCC entirely.

So begins the high school melodrama of Strawberry 100 %; Junpei and his friends begin the hunt for the mystery girl and her strawberry panties, and everyone gets mixed up in a strange, all to familiar love circle where everyone is sure that two people are perfect for each other, but intervening relationships, arguments, and other such tomfoolery end up keeping them away from each other.

Large advocacy groups with access to considerable resources and large followings tell others that we should be asking people to reduce — rather than end — their exploitation, diluting our collective vegan message of social justice and undermining the ethical argument.

The other experience I had was a rescue organization was so desperate to get the dogs into homes they did not listen to me (in my city) when I told them what I wanted to adopt and they kept sending me emails of dogs that were not what I was looking for, big argument there and unfortunately in the end I blocked her on gmail.

008.010 Introduction to the End of an Argument, Intifada (speaking for oneself... speaking for others...; Jayce Salloum, Elia Suleiman, VHS, 45 min.

I hear echoes of «Wilson's Law» above, and also some resonance with articles I've written focusing on how environmental and animal - welfare groups, while often working toward shared goals (an end to whaling, for instance) rarely use the same arguments, with one focused on population statistics and the other on ethics.

In other words, if climate sensitivity is toward the low end, 2 K is more dangerous than we currently give it credit for, and arguments for low risk because of low sensitivity are less valid because that means that more ecological changes occur for a given temperature change than currently thought.

Hence I said that the more interesting characteristic of lukewarmism is its accommodation to arguments from either other end of the continuum (notwithstanding its naivety)-- I don't think the middle ground has eschewed «ideology», though it is likely where there is more reflection on it.

Two economists made a similar argument in Issues, adding that other useful tax - related policies include an end to energy supply subsidies, a green tax swap, a tightening of the gas guzzler tax, and conservation incentive programs.

And through conversations with others in the growing climate justice movement, I began to see all kinds of ways that climate change could become a catalyzing force for positive change — how it could be the best argument progressives have ever had to demand the rebuilding and reviving of local economies; to reclaim our democracies from corrosive corporate influence; to block harmful new free trade deals and rewrite old ones; to invest in starving public infrastructure like mass transit and affordable housing; to take back ownership of essential services like energy and water; to remake our sick agricultural system into something much healthier; to open borders to migrants whose displacement is linked to climate impacts; to finally respect Indigenous land rights — all of which would help to end grotesque levels of inequality within our nations and between them.

It was observed that finally such discussions end in religion being recognized as pure faith as Paul of Tarsus insisted; he maintained strongly that it is a mistake to try to base it on any other argument; he said it actually weakens the essence of religion to attempt to base it on anything other than absolute faith.

If you point out that there is a spectrum of arguments in play, from the morally neutral science at one end to the doom - mongering at the other, you are accused of conspiracy theorising.

We have all heard the arguments surrounding climate change, from impending doom and draconian GHG reduction measures at one end of the spectrum to the destruction of the global economy and the characterization of global warming as fiction, at the other end.

They cover the spectrum of life (and strife) as an attorney, «including but not limited to» ridiculous hours and the other sacrifices lawyers (and their families) make, headhunters and lateral movement, client relations, the adversarial system, the art of negotiating, time records and bills, meeting deadlines, document reviews, legal reasoning and argument, cross-examination, business travel, and year - end bonuses.

There are arguments on both sides of the aisle: for some, even Fiverr's open pricing plan (where members can price services higher than five dollars, which calls its whole naming convention into question, but that's a different story) sets a floor too low to take the creative work of artists and writers seriously; for others, it's a great way to jumpstart your career or take on small odd jobs to make ends meet.

This did not end here: as can be seen in a video uploaded by other attendees, Buterin stood up and addressed some of these problematic claims, and dropped the ball by saying, «Given that [Wright] makes so many non-sequiturs [an invalid argument] at this stage, why is this fraud allowed to speak at this conference?»

If you fail to sit down and discuss finances, religion, sex, housing, your future, and other topics in great detail, you could end up with nothing but argument after argument for the rest of your days.

Most of them feel that, no matter what they do, they end up engaging in the same arguments over and over again, and each member of the partnership usually feels like his or her needs are not understood or met by the other.

And, it's important for a couple to not just count their conflicts or how often they quarrel, but to understand how they manage to reach a resolution at the end of an argument and recall their attachment to each other and the importance of their relationship.

During one of these arguments, both partners end up simply reacting to each other, often not hearing or understanding what the other is really trying to say.