Our lost faith in public education has led us to
other false conclusions, including the conviction that teachers unions protect «bad apples.»
Not exact matches
My only
other conclusion is
false faith to make it seem that cursing is acceptable to the faith?
The
conclusion from this examination of the texts is that the analogy between molecules and electrons on the one hand and God and actual occasions on the
other is without foundation and very misleading, since it lulls the unwary reader into feeling that since Whitehead at least implicitly acknowledges overlapping regional standpoints in the first instance (which we have seen to be
false) then to say that God is omnipresent, meaning that the standpoint of God includes the regions which constitute the standpoints of all actual occasions, is merely an extension of a general principle which Whitehead at least implicitly endorses.
There're things witnessed that can not be explained away, at least not in a way that neatly tucks everything in, folds it up and demonstrates that there's nothing behind it
other than
false conclusions derived from brain functions.
You assume that one may be wrong or
false, and therefore this
other one which is similar (a faith) is also
false, and that your
conclusion is right.
Ryan and Roverts believe that some or many of the
other American scientists must have: (1) foresaken their search for the truth, (2) knowingly espoused
false conclusions, or (3) remained silent about the scientific and engineering evidence supporting demolition as the true cause for the collapse of the 3 buildings on 9/11.
Using a series of
false flashbacks (a little like Rashomon, but mostly not) and a bunch of misleading information, Basic makes it impossible to decipher its central mystery by any means logical or intuitive (
other than by that reliable big - budget thriller dictum that if it's the stupidest
conclusion it must be right).
«It mischaracterizes how special education is funded, it ignores millions of dollars that charters pay to the district for facilities, and it guesstimates the staff time of hundreds of district employees, among many
other distortions and
false conclusions.
I analyzed the entire GHCN data set to prove that this claim was
false — and a half dozen or so
other bloggers reproduced my analysis, all confirming my
conclusion.
Your website, calculations and articles takes no account of things like this, among several
others, so your
conclusions are
false.
They construct their arguments so no
other conclusion is possible but based on assumptions which are blatantly
false or clearly unknown.
The most explosive revelation involves a 1996 Delhi High Court ruling in which a judge said he had «no hesitation in coming to the
conclusion» that Pachauri and two
others had «sworn to
false affidavits.»