Sentences with phrase «other false teachings»

Not exact matches

we have to be careful about false teaching for that's the way the devil works Today is Sunday, Others called it Palm Sunday.
In all the religions I've visited, I find Jehovah's witnesses to be more truthfull... The other ones are either money obsessed or teach false things.
jwt, yeahright, tom tom on the pipe, and others YHWH made this law of life for all the people of this earth, so to say your god is redundant, and at a lost for as He states in Isaiah 56, and in Exodus 33 vs. 16 this is for all nations, and people of this earth those who were mislead, and not taught properly by these priest, popes, false prophets, elders, and shepherds, as YHWH taught us of them all misleading the flocks, in Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23 vs.1 - 8, Ezekiel 20, and Ezekiel 34, yet YHWH will save them all when His day comes, as said in Isaiah 51 vs. 5, that His righteousness is near.
We must recognize that if someone comes into our group who teaches differently than we do, one of us is a false teacher — and it might not be the other guy.
Still others stray from the faith (1 Tim 1:5 - 6), shipwreck their faith (1 Tim 1:18 - 20), fall away from the faith (1 Tim 4:1 - 3), deny the faith (1 Tim 5:8), cast off initial faith to follow Satan (1 Tim 5:12 - 15), stray from the faith by loving money (1 Tim 6:9 - 10), teach false doctrine (1 Tim 6:20 - 21), and deny Christ and live faithless lives (2 Tim 2:11 - 13).
My favorite part of the post is «that if someone comes into our group who teaches differently than we do, one of us is a false teacher — and it might not be the other guy».
Any leadership provided is not to be honorific but rather for the service to others and to protect the flock from false teachings as when the need arises.
As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.
False doctrine is what all religions claim other religions teach.
False religion teaches everything else other than what true religion teaches.
This verse reveals that there is such a thing as false teaching, and we do have a responsibility to warn them and others about their teachings.
More problematically, when we defend these false descriptions of man, we go against the clear teachings of the Church and lead others to embrace one of the great confusions of our age.
Jesus did not teach hate and intolerance he did not reject health care he healed the sick he did not preach for profit and he did not deny anyone there rights he did not look down on others and he did not bear false witness the right wing conservatives have hijacked the word of god to fit their political agenda.
The Catholic Church is a false Christian church who by its teachings and practices contradict the Bible more than any other.
Witneses charge zero and always remember they use Gods name and you do nt you just call him God or lord their are many Gods and Many lords but their is only 1 Jehovah and I'm am 100 % sure he doesn't appreciate you calling his servants those who teach others about who God is and what his plans are all you guys seem to do is say God hates people but the bible says differently we will see though how much of a cult they are when false religion is done away with.
The fact that neither you nor the church has yet identified ANY SORT of «false doctrine» that Kate was supposedly teaching, leads one to believe that her question must be the REAL reason she was ex-communicated as no other viable reason has been presented or even hinted at!
I am merely responding scripturally and publically to false teachings that have been set forth publically by others.
First of all I would like to point out that in another comment you appealed to the teachings of Christ to counter other false views.
If one believes the Bible to be inspired or a guide for Christian living but doesn't necessarily believe it is inerrant or the literal word of God, that doesn't have to mean we just throw it all out... it doesn't have to shatter your worldview (i.e. it's either all true or all false — fundamentalists love to think this way and teach others to do the same) Use the Episcopal 3 - legged stool model (Scripture, reason, tradition) or the Wesleyan Quadrilateral (Scripture, tradition, reason, experience).
This is a teaching that false religion has advocated and has twisted the bible so that others would be forced into a certain course of action.
After trying to teach evolution and learning the truth about that and other false science (see piltdown man, etc) I have looked more at all offerings and just believe what I have found to be the truth.
Now certainly, the concept of false teaching and unsound doctrine is found elsewhere in Scripture, and the term «false prophets» which is also found in 2 Peter 2:1 is also found in other passages, but the disparaging label of «false teacher» which is so frequently tossed about these days, is not a common term in Scripture.
Nervously, I reminded him (Professor Albritton also taught Aristotle) that, based upon a rudimentary (and now recognized to be false) empirical observation, Aristotle and Aquinas thought that the stars in the firmament were unchangeable, permanent, and, thus in a special sense, «necessary beings,» different from all other changeable substances they had observed.
We are taught NOT to listen to any other doctrine... there are false teachers out there... don't compromise your faith... don't ask questions... God has appointed us to teach you... WE have the truth... we're not like those OTHER churother doctrine... there are false teachers out there... don't compromise your faith... don't ask questions... God has appointed us to teach you... WE have the truth... we're not like those OTHER churOTHER churches.
In case you didn't know it is the same God different covenants.The people who God was dealing with like now were the ones that had false teachings and were actually teaching others to worship other gods.
He will teach a false doctrine that appears to be righteous truth, so much so that I think that he will be able to convince atheists of his evil teachings, but that doesn't matter, he already has them in his «basket», but they would be extra «tools» to use to convince others of his wicket ways.
But wouldn't you agree that Jesus was trying to stop the spead of «free - thinkers» perpetrating false teaching --- from the Pharisees to the teachings of Balaam, the Nicolaitans, and the Jezebel's, and other false religions?
This is no different than some young people going to college and leaving their brains at the door and swallowing evolutionary theory and purposely rejecting the obvious of what creation clearly shows except this is leaving your brain at the door of theology school and accepting man's opinion over what is clearly stated in the holy scriptures, and then teaching others false doctrine.
There is no reason to doubt that many genuine sayings of Jesus are embedded in this chapter, and that they include a prophecy of the destruction of the Temple, prophecies of persecution, of false Christs, and of the suddenness of the return of the Son of man; but the genuine sayings of Jesus have been so transformed and robbed of their original contexts in the process of forming a long and confused series of prophecies of the End, many of whose elements are derived from other sources, that the final result is very different in spirit from the original teaching of Jesus.
Sadly schools and other education establishments like Colleges and Universities are particularly vulnerable to false fire alarms — disrupting vital teaching time and interrupting crucial exams.
Another author in the book, [Rutgers Graduate School of Education Assistant Professor] Beth Rubin, discusses how racially patterned tracking «teaches» students the same false lesson: that some «race groups» are smarter than others.
Is it generally taught in law schools that if no person other than one who utters a false statement can be deceived by it, then there is no dishonesty?
Basically, what I'm saying is, the assumption in your second paragraph — that civil rights law is something you can teach yourself by reading other people's pleadings and filings — is false.
Other problems include some false accusations from faculty although they are only trying to make the school a better more safe environment for both themselves and the students that they watch over and teach.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z