This objection is closely related to
the other flawed assumption that «it takes money to make money».
This objection is closely related to
the other flawed assumption that «it takes money to make money».
Not exact matches
But years of data from long - term studies by Doak and
other scientists examining plants, birds, mammals and fungi in the field are showing the
flaws in these
assumptions.
Backed by research and
other evidence, he points out the
flaws in each
assumption, and then proposes alternative
assumptions as the basis for new, innovative schools that would emphasize such elements as
Peter (11:57:58) said: The fatal
flaw here is the
assumption that it takes the warming from CO2, or any
other greenhouse gas with the exception of water vapor to trigger the warming but, once this is done, the temperature increase from water vapor keeps the» spiral» going.
The fatal
flaw here is the
assumption that it takes the warming from CO2, or any
other greenhouse gas with the exception of water vapor to trigger the warming but, once this is done, the temperature increase from water vapor keeps the «spiral» going.
Various
other scientific groups pointed out several
flaws in the methods and
assumptions in each of their publications, and in fact one editor resigned because he felt his journal had failed its task of conducting rigorous peer - review in publishing a fundamentally
flawed 2011 Spencer and Braswell paper (black in the first graphic).
But
other researchers quickly published work saying that the methods he had used to analyze the data were
flawed and that his theory made
assumptions that were inconsistent with known facts.
Finding: «The presence of opposing expert testimony caused jurors to be skeptical of all expert testimony rather than sensitizing them to
flaws in the
other expert's testimony... Thus, contrary to the
assumptions in the Supreme Court's decision in Daubert, opposing expert testimony may not be an effective safeguard against junk science in the courtroom.»
(Again, for a discussion of the
flawed assumptions, conclusions and
other problems inherent in some of these early studies, see those-jointcustody-studies.html)